Each entry below is one question turned into a map query. It names the fields it weighs and why, shows the areas that come out on top with their real measured values, and states what the data cannot tell you. The link at the end opens that exact query on the San Antonio map with the weights already set, so you can change a weight, swap a field, or draw your own area and get a different answer.
None of these are the “right” query. They are starting points chosen to show which fields exist for San Antonio and how combining them changes what you can honestly say.
Which San Antonio areas have many residents but few bank branches?
Coverage gap index — 2020 Census resident counts ranked against mapped bank branches
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are North San Antonio Hills, Lackland Terrace, and North Central. North San Antonio Hills leads with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈14,416 total residents. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Residents ranked high against mapped bank and credit-union branches ranked low. It is called a coverage gap rather than an absence because the scorer blends percentile ranks: an area can top this index while still having several branches in it.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
bank or credit union competition
lower
50%
Count of mapped bank and credit-union branches, scored inverted so thinner presence ranks higher.
Total
higher
50%
The 2020 Census resident count — the demand side of the blend.
What this can’t tell you
It is not residents per branch. Two areas with very different true ratios can rank identically, and a high rank never means there is no branch nearby — only that mapped branch presence is thin relative to population.
Try changing it
· Raise the branch weight to lean the index toward supply rather than demand.
· Swap residents for the 65-and-over count to target a specific customer profile.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on bank or credit union competition (weighted 0.5, lower ranks higher) and total residents (weighted 0.5, higher ranks higher). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
North San Antonio Hills ranks #1 with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈14,416 total residents. Lackland Terrace ranks #2 with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈14,925 total residents. North Central (Bexar County) ranks #3 with a score of 92.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈12,978 total residents. El Charro (Bexar County) ranks #4 with a score of 90.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈13,189 total residents. Alta Vista ranks #5 with a score of 90.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈13,120 total residents.
Fields scored: bank or credit union competition and Total (2020). 8,863 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which San Antonio areas have strong attractions but limited hotel supply?
Gap index — mapped attractions and transit ranked against existing hotel presence
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Midtown, Monte Vista Historical District, and Southtown. Midtown leads with a score of 52.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2 hotels nearby, ≈29 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈0 transit stops. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Citizens on Alertin the Bexar County districtScore 50
≈0 hotels nearby
≈11 arts & entertainment venues nearby
≈1 transit stops
Westover Hillsin the Bexar County districtScore 46
≈0 hotels nearby
≈22 arts & entertainment venues nearby
≈0 transit stops
How this query was built
Arts and entertainment venue density and transit access ranked high against existing hotel presence ranked low — the three things that decide whether a location can draw and hold overnight visitors.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
hotel competition
lower
40%
Count of mapped hotels, scored inverted so thinner presence ranks higher.
arts and entertainment
higher
35%
Count of all mapped arts, entertainment and attraction venues — the visitor draw.
transit stop count
higher
25%
Count of transit stops reachable from the hex.
What this can’t tell you
It has no room counts, no occupancy, no rates, no planning constraints and no site availability. Thin mapped hotel presence is not proof there is room in the market.
Try changing it
· Raise the hotel weight to prioritise areas with the least existing supply.
· Swap attractions for eat-and-drink venues to test a dining-led location instead.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on hotel competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.4), arts and entertainment (higher ranks higher, weight 0.35), and transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.25). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Midtown ranks #1 with a score of 52.7/100 across 37 blocks, featuring ≈2 hotels nearby, ≈29 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈0 transit stops. Monte Vista Historical District ranks #2 with a score of 48.1/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈1 hotel nearby, ≈14 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈0 transit stops. Southtown ranks #3 with a score of 48/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2 hotels nearby, ≈31 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈0 transit stops. Citizens on Alert ranks #4 with a score of 50.3/100 across 35 blocks, with ≈0 hotels nearby, ≈11 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈1 transit stops. Westover Hills ranks #5 with a score of 46.4/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈0 hotels nearby, ≈22 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈0 transit stops.
Fields scored: hotel competition, arts and entertainment and transit stop count. 8,667 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which lower-income parts of San Antonio have the fewest grocery stores?
Gap index — ACS 2018-2022 residents below the poverty level ranked against mapped grocery stores
In San Antonio, the top-ranking areas are North Central, Pasadena Heights (Bexar County), and Southwest (Bexar County). North Central leads with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 2 grocery stores nearby and approximately 5,008 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level.
≈4,658 residents (income in the past 12 months below poverty level)
How this query was built
Residents below the poverty level ranked high against mapped grocery stores ranked low. It is the food-access question posed as a relative ranking rather than a claim that any area has no food retail.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
grocery store competition
lower
45%
Count of mapped grocery stores, scored inverted so thinner presence ranks higher.
Income in the past 12 months below poverty level
higher
55%
The "income below poverty level" cell of the ACS 2018-2022 poverty table.
What this can’t tell you
Mapped grocery presence is not food access: it carries no store size, no price level, no fresh-produce range and no opening hours, and a large supermarket just outside a hex serves it perfectly well. This ranks places; it does not identify anywhere as being without food.
Try changing it
· Add transit stops to weigh how easily residents can reach stores further out.
· Swap the poverty count for household income brackets to change the hardship measure.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on grocery store competition (lower ranks higher, weighted 0.45) and income in the past 12 months below poverty level (higher ranks higher, weighted 0.55). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
North Central ranks #1 with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 2 grocery stores nearby and approximately 5,008 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. Pasadena Heights (Bexar County) ranks #2 with a score of 93.8/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 0 grocery stores nearby and approximately 3,239 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. Southwest (Bexar County) ranks #3 with a score of 93.6/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 0 grocery stores nearby and approximately 3,698 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. West Side (west) ranks #4 with a score of 93.1/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 0 grocery stores nearby and approximately 2,862 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. West Side (south) ranks #5 with a score of 92.8/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 1 grocery store nearby and approximately 4,658 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level.
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: grocery store competition and Income in the past 12 months below poverty level (2022). 8,857 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which parts of San Antonio have the fewest Italian restaurants for their population?
Italian restaurant demand-and-competition index — resident counts and walkable streets ranked against existing Italian presence
For San Antonio, the top-ranked areas are North San Antonio Hills, Lackland Terrace, and North Central. North San Antonio Hills scores 71.5/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈0 Italian restaurants nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈14,416 residents. These areas represent clusters of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
San Juan Gardensin the Bexar County districtScore 69
≈0 Italian restaurants nearby
≈0 km of walkable streets
≈12,557 residents (total)
How this query was built
Resident counts and walkable street length ranked against the number of restaurants of this type already mapped in the area, the last inverted so thin presence ranks high.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
italian restaurant competition
lower
45%
Count of mapped Italian restaurants already trading in the area.
pedestrian length m
higher
25%
Metres of walkable street — a proxy for how much passing footfall a frontage can see.
Total
higher
30%
The 2020 Census resident count — the local demand base.
What this can’t tell you
Cuisine labels come from how a venue describes itself in the map data, so coverage is uneven and a restaurant serving this food may be recorded under a different label. Thin mapped presence is not proof of demand, and this is not a claim about what residents want to eat.
Try changing it
· Raise the competition weight to prioritise areas with the fewest existing restaurants.
· Swap the demand pillar for a specific age band or household type.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
The same query, retargeted
Which parts of San Antonio have the fewest Chinese restaurants for their population?
Top areas: North San Antonio Hills, Lackland Terrace and Alta Vista — ≈0 Chinese restaurants nearby.
Same fields and weights, only the category swapped — adjust any of them on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on Italian restaurant competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.45), pedestrian length m (higher ranks higher, weight 0.25), and Total residents (higher ranks higher, weight 0.3). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
North San Antonio Hills ranks #1 with a score of 71.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 Italian restaurants nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈14,416 residents. Lackland Terrace ranks #2 with a score of 71.3/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈0 Italian restaurants nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈13,963 residents. North Central ranks #3 with a score of 70.9/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈0 Italian restaurants nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈13,172 residents. Alta Vista ranks #4 with a score of 69.8/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈1 Italian restaurant nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈13,520 residents. San Juan Gardens ranks #5 with a score of 69.3/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈0 Italian restaurants nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈12,557 residents.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: italian restaurant competition, pedestrian length m and Total (2020). 8,669 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where should you open a new bookstore in San Antonio?
bookstore demand-and-competition index — resident counts and walkable streets ranked against existing bookstore presence
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest scores are Lackland Terrace, Leon Valley, and Northwest Crossing. Lackland Terrace has the highest score of 71.7/100 across 37 blocks, with data showing ≈0 bookstores nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈3,647 young adults. These areas are clusters of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Three signals: how many people are around, how walkable the streets are, and how many of this business type are already mapped there. The last is scored inverted, so an area ranks high when demand signals are strong and existing presence is thin.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
bookstore competition
lower
45%
Count of mapped bookstores already trading in the area.
pedestrian length m
higher
25%
Metres of walkable street — a proxy for how much passing footfall a frontage can see.
young adults
higher
30%
The 2020 Census resident count — the local demand base.
What this can’t tell you
This is a shortlist, not a site recommendation. It has no rent, no footfall, no unit availability, no licensing and no catchment modelling, and thin mapped presence is not proof that an area lacks provision.
Try changing it
· Raise the competition weight to prioritise areas with the least existing presence.
· Swap the demand pillar for the age band or household type your customers actually fall into.
· Draw your own catchment on the map to score just that area.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
The same query, retargeted
Where should you open a new gym in San Antonio?
Top areas: Lackland Terrace, Northwest Crossing and Leon Valley — ≈0 gyms nearby.
Same fields and weights, only the category swapped — adjust any of them on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on bookstore competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.45), pedestrian length in meters (higher ranks higher, weight 0.25), and young adults (higher ranks higher, weight 0.3). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Lackland Terrace ranks #1 with a score of 71.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bookstores nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈3,647 young adults. Leon Valley ranks #2 with a score of 71.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bookstores nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈5,049 young adults. Northwest Crossing ranks #3 with a score of 71/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bookstores nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈3,204 young adults. Northeast ranks #4 with a score of 70.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bookstores nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈4,353 young adults. Northwest ranks #5 with a score of 70.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 bookstores nearby, ≈0 km of walkable streets, and ≈5,790 young adults.
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: bookstore competition, pedestrian length m and young adults. 8,669 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which San Antonio areas have high household incomes but little retail?
Index — ACS 2018-2022 income levels ranked against mapped retail density
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Sonterra, Castle Hills Forest and Northwest (north-west). Sonterra leads with a score of 95.3/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈6 retail & shopping venues nearby and median income: 186,955. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Household income ranked high against mapped retail presence ranked low. It points at spending power that currently has little to spend it on locally, which is the classic catchment argument for a new store.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
retail competition
lower
45%
Count of all mapped retail venues, scored inverted so thinner presence ranks higher.
Median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
higher
55%
The ACS 2018-2022 household income figure per block group, population-weighted onto the hex grid.
What this can’t tell you
Thin mapped retail is not proof an area lacks shops, and high income does not mean residents shop locally — they may simply shop elsewhere. It has no rent, no footfall and no catchment modelling.
Try changing it
· Switch to the $1M-plus home value count for a countable affluence signal.
· Swap total retail for a specific category to test one vertical.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on retail competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.45) and Median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars) (higher ranks higher, weight 0.55), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Sonterra ranks #1 with a score of 95.3/100 across 37 blocks: ≈6 retail & shopping venues nearby and median income: 186,955. Castle Hills Forest ranks #2 with a score of 92.9/100 across 37 blocks: ≈3 retail & shopping venues nearby and median income: 118,250. Northwest (north-west) ranks #3 with a score of 95.4/100 across 36 blocks: ≈2 retail & shopping venues nearby and median income: 152,882. It spans Northwest. Northwest (north-west 2) ranks #4 with a score of 92.7/100 across 37 blocks: ≈3 retail & shopping venues nearby and median income: 115,663. It spans Northwest. Stone Oak ranks #5 with a score of 92.5/100 across 37 blocks: ≈13 retail & shopping venues nearby and median income: 146,344.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: retail competition and Median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars) (2022). 8,648 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which San Antonio areas combine high household incomes with residents aged 25 to 39?
Overlap index — ACS 2018-2022 income levels ranked with 2020 Census age counts
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest scores are Great Northwest, Northwest, and Mt. Arrowhead. Great Northwest has a score of 79.2/100 across 37 blocks, with a median income of 95,726 and approximately 2,408 residents aged 25-39. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
North San Antonio Hillsin the Spring Vistas districtScore 77
median income: 92,639
≈2,585 residents aged 25-39
How this query was built
Household income and the 25-39 age band are ranked together, high on both. They come from different censuses — income is an ACS 2018-2022 block-group estimate, the age count a 2020 Census 100% enumeration — and from different universes, households and people.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
higher
50%
The ACS 2018-2022 household income figure per block group, population-weighted onto the hex grid.
residents aged 25-39
higher
50%
The 25-29, 30-34 and 35-39 male and female cells of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It cannot say that the residents aged 25-39 are the ones with the high incomes. No table crosses age with income, so this is two separate distributions ranking high in the same place: an overlap of areas, not a description of anybody.
Try changing it
· Switch to household income brackets for a countable income figure instead of a level.
· Swap the age band for 18-24 or 65-and-over to move the profile.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars), giving higher ranks to higher incomes (weight 0.5), and residents aged 25-39, giving higher ranks to higher counts (weight 0.5). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Great Northwest ranks #1 with a score of 79.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing a median income of 95,726 and approximately 2,408 residents aged 25-39. Northwest ranks #2 with a score of 79/100 across 37 blocks, with a median income of 105,451 and approximately 2,218 residents aged 25-39. Mt. Arrowhead ranks #3 with a score of 77.6/100 across 37 blocks, with a median income of 116,730 and approximately 1,758 residents aged 25-39. Lackland Terrace ranks #4 with a score of 76.5/100 across 37 blocks, with a median income of 90,404 and approximately 2,660 residents aged 25-39. North San Antonio Hills (Spring Vistas) ranks #5 with a score of 76.5/100 across 37 blocks, with a median income of 92,639 and approximately 2,585 residents aged 25-39.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars) (2022) and residents aged 25-39. 8,872 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where does high rent burden meet strong transit access in San Antonio?
Overlap index — ACS 2018-2022 rent-burdened households ranked with transit stop density
The highest-ranking areas are Northwest (north-west), Northwest (north), and Leon Valley. Northwest (north-west) leads with a score of 57.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3,380 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent and ≈0 transit stops. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
≈1,849 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent
≈0 transit stops
How this query was built
Renter households paying 30% or more of income in rent, ranked alongside transit stop density. Housing and transport costs trade off against each other, so where both cost pressure and transit access are high is a distinct policy picture from cost pressure in car-dependent areas.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
transit stop count
higher
40%
Count of transit stops reachable from the hex.
renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent
higher
60%
The 30%-and-over bands of the ACS 2018-2022 rent-as-a-share-of-income table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It cannot say that the rent-burdened households are the ones using the transit — no table crosses the two. Stop count is not service quality.
Try changing it
· Invert the transit weight to find cost pressure in poorly connected areas instead.
· Swap rent burden for residents below the poverty level to change the hardship measure.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block on transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.4) and renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Northwest (north-west) ranks #1 with a score of 57.1/100 across 37 blocks: ≈3,380 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent and ≈0 transit stops. Northwest (north) ranks #2 with a score of 53.6/100 across 37 blocks: ≈2,488 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent and ≈0 transit stops. Leon Valley ranks #3 with a score of 53.4/100 across 37 blocks: ≈2,445 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent and ≈0 transit stops. Bexar County ranks #4 with a score of 53/100 across 37 blocks: ≈3,641 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent and ≈0 transit stops. Monte Vista Historical District ranks #5 with a score of 52.4/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,849 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent and ≈0 transit stops.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: transit stop count and renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent. 8,838 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where are homes valued over $1 million in San Antonio?
Owner-occupied homes valued at $1,000,000 or more — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are The Dominion (north), The Vineyard, and The Dominion (north 2). The Dominion (north) leads with a score of 96.4/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈160 homes valued $1M or more. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The Dominion (north)in the The Dominion districtalso spans The DominionScore 96
The ACS publishes home value in 28 brackets, so the three top brackets sum to a countable "over $1 million" figure. Brackets are counts and sum correctly, which the published value figure does not.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
homes valued $1M or more
higher
100%
The $1,000,000-1,499,999, $1,500,000-1,999,999 and $2,000,000-or-more brackets of the ACS 2018-2022 home value table, summed.
What this can’t tell you
Value is the owner's own estimate, covers owner-occupied units only, and is a five-year sample figure in 2022 dollars — not a current market price and not a measure of the occupants' income.
Try changing it
· Add household income brackets to see where high-value housing and high incomes coincide, as an overlap.
· Swap in units owned free and clear to find high-value, mortgage-free housing.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on homes valued $1M or more (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
The Dominion (north) ranks #1 with a score of 96.4/100 across 37 blocks: ≈160 homes valued $1M or more. The Vineyard ranks #2 with a score of 94.7/100 across 37 blocks: ≈80 homes valued $1M or more. The Dominion (north 2) ranks #3 with a score of 90.9/100 across 37 blocks: ≈46 homes valued $1M or more. Midtown ranks #4 with a score of 88.9/100 across 36 blocks: ≈224 homes valued $1M or more. Woods of Alon ranks #5 with a score of 85.1/100 across 37 blocks: ≈73 homes valued $1M or more.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: homes valued $1M or more. 8,720 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where are household income levels highest in San Antonio?
Block-group household income estimates, ACS 2018-2022, averaged onto the map grid
The highest-ranking areas are Sonterra, Stone Oak, and Northwest. Sonterra leads with a score of 98.4/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows a median income of 186,955. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The ACS publishes a household income figure per block group. The map grid is finer than a block group, so each hex carries a population-weighted average of the block-group figures covering it — which is why this page says "income level" rather than quoting a median for a neighbourhood.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
higher
100%
The ACS 2018-2022 household income figure per block group, population-weighted onto the hex grid.
What this can’t tell you
No hex here holds a median: averaging medians does not produce one. It is a five-year sample estimate with a wide margin of error in small areas, and it describes households, not individual earnings or wealth.
Try changing it
· Switch to the household income brackets for a countable figure instead of a level.
· Add retail venues to see where income levels and commercial density diverge, as an index.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block on median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars), with higher ranks indicating higher income (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
Sonterra ranks #1 with a score of 98.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing a median income of 186,955. Stone Oak ranks #2 with a score of 95.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing a median income of 146,344. Northwest ranks #3 with a score of 95.1/100 across 36 blocks, showing a median income of 152,882. Greystone ranks #4 with a score of 92.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing a median income of 138,530. Forest Crest ranks #5 with a score of 91.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing a median income of 124,673.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Median household income in the past 12 months (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars) (2022). 8,648 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do households earning $50,000 to $74,999 live in San Antonio?
Households in the $50,000 to $74,999 bracket — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Leon Valley, Northwest, and North Central. Leon Valley leads with a score of 89.3/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈1,575 households earning $50,000-$74,999. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The ACS publishes household income in 17 brackets. A bracket is a count, so unlike the income figure it sums correctly and survives being placed on the map grid intact — which is why these pages can state a number rather than describe a level.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
households earning $50,000-$74,999
higher
100%
The $50,000-59,999 and $60,000-74,999 brackets of the ACS 2018-2022 household income table, summed.
What this can’t tell you
Household income is not individual earnings and not wealth, and it is a five-year sample estimate in 2022 dollars with a wide margin of error in small areas. A bracket count says nothing about who is in those households.
Try changing it
· Switch to a neighbouring bracket to widen or narrow the income range.
· Add home value brackets to see where income and housing value coincide, as an overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
The same query, retargeted
Where do households earning under $25,000 live in San Antonio?
Top areas: Alta Vista, West Side (south) and San Juan Gardens — ≈2,147 households earning under $25,000.
Same fields and weights, only the category swapped — adjust any of them on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on households earning $50,000-$74,999 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Leon Valley ranks #1 with a score of 89.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,575 households earning $50,000-$74,999. Northwest ranks #2 with a score of 88.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,446 households earning $50,000-$74,999. North Central ranks #3 with a score of 87.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,099 households earning $50,000-$74,999. Palm Heights ranks #4 with a score of 86.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,206 households earning $50,000-$74,999. Bexar County ranks #5 with a score of 86/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,455 households earning $50,000-$74,999.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: households earning $50,000-$74,999. 8,858 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do renters spend 30% or more of their income on rent in San Antonio?
Renter households paying 30% or more of household income in rent — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas for renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent include Northwest (north-west), Northwest (north), and Leon Valley. Northwest (north-west) leads with a score of 95.1/100 across 37 blocks, representing ≈3,380 renter households. Each area consists of high-scoring blocks clustered within a 1,200 m radius.
≈1,849 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent
How this query was built
Rent burden is the one place the US census crosses rent with income directly: the table reports rent as a percentage of household income, so the 30%-and-over bands sum to a published count. Everywhere else, rent and income are separate tables that can only be laid over each other.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent
higher
100%
The 30-34.9%, 35-39.9%, 40-49.9% and 50%-or-more bands of the ACS 2018-2022 rent-as-a-share-of-income table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
Its universe is renter-occupied units with cash rent, so it excludes owners and no-cash-rent units, and a "not computed" category is left out of the count rather than assumed. It is a sample estimate.
Try changing it
· Compare against residents below the poverty level, which measures hardship differently.
· Add transit stops to see where cost pressure and transit access coincide, as an index.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent, with higher ranks indicating more households (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Northwest (north-west) ranks #1 with a score of 95.1/100 across 37 blocks, representing ≈3,380 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent. Northwest (north) ranks #2 with a score of 89.3/100 across 37 blocks, representing ≈2,488 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent. Leon Valley ranks #3 with a score of 88.9/100 across 37 blocks, representing ≈2,445 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent. Bexar County ranks #4 with a score of 88.4/100 across 37 blocks, representing ≈3,641 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent. Monte Vista Historical District ranks #5 with a score of 87.4/100 across 37 blocks, representing ≈1,849 renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: renter households paying 30%+ of income in rent. 8,838 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where are residents below the poverty level concentrated in San Antonio?
Residents with income below the federal poverty level — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, West Side (south), North Central, and Alta Vista are the highest-ranking areas. West Side (south) leads with a score of 93.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈7,033 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
≈4,309 residents (income in the past 12 months below poverty level)
Los Angeles Heightsin the Bexar County districtScore 93
≈4,000 residents (income in the past 12 months below poverty level)
West Side (south-west)also spans West SideScore 90
≈3,891 residents (income in the past 12 months below poverty level)
How this query was built
The ACS poverty table crosses poverty status with household and family type, so the below-poverty count is a published cell. The federal poverty threshold varies by household size and composition, which is what makes this a better hardship measure than a flat income cut-off.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Income in the past 12 months below poverty level
higher
100%
The "income in the past 12 months below poverty level" cell of the ACS 2018-2022 poverty table.
What this can’t tell you
It is a five-year sample estimate at block-group scale with a wide margin of error in small areas. The federal threshold is national and is not adjusted for local housing costs, so it understates hardship in expensive cities.
Try changing it
· Add grocery stores to weigh this population against everyday food retail, as an overlap.
· Compare against the rent-burden count, which measures cost pressure directly.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on income in the past 12 months below poverty level, with higher ranks indicating higher values (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
West Side (south) ranks #1 with a score of 93.6/100 across 37 blocks, encompassing ≈7,033 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. North Central ranks #2 with a score of 93.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈5,008 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. Alta Vista ranks #3 with a score of 92.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈4,309 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. Los Angeles Heights ranks #4 with a score of 92.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈4,000 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level. West Side (south-west) ranks #5 with a score of 90.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3,891 residents with income in the past 12 months below poverty level.
Each area is defined as a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Income in the past 12 months below poverty level (2022). 8,857 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Housing units with seven or more rooms — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest rankings are Stone Oak (Bexar County), Stonefield, and Great Northwest. Stone Oak (Bexar County) has the top score of 94.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,153 homes with 7 or more rooms. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The seven-, eight- and nine-or-more-room cells of the ACS rooms table, summed. Rooms are how the US census measures home size; there is no floor area figure anywhere in the extract.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
homes with 7 or more rooms
higher
100%
The 7-room, 8-room and 9-or-more-room cells of the ACS 2018-2022 rooms-per-unit table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
A room count is not floor area and not space per person — the census publishes no per-resident figure, so a large home with many occupants is indistinguishable here from a large home with few.
Try changing it
· Add households of seven or more people to see where large homes and large households coincide.
· Add home value brackets to separate large homes from high-value ones.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on homes with 7 or more rooms, with higher ranks indicating more of these homes (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Stone Oak (Bexar County) ranks #1 with a score of 94.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,153 homes with 7 or more rooms. Stonefield ranks #2 with a score of 92.3/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,843 homes with 7 or more rooms. Great Northwest ranks #3 with a score of 91.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,820 homes with 7 or more rooms. Robards ranks #4 with a score of 91.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,788 homes with 7 or more rooms. Northeast ranks #5 with a score of 91.3/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,814 homes with 7 or more rooms.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: homes with 7 or more rooms. 8,858 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which San Antonio areas have many young adults but few bars?
Gap index — 2020 Census residents aged 18-24 ranked against mapped nightlife venues
In San Antonio, Lackland Terrace, Northwest, and Northwest Crossing are the highest-ranking areas. Lackland Terrace leads with a score of 93.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 1 bars & nightlife venue nearby and approximately 2,069 residents aged 18-24. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Northwest Los Angeles Heightsin the Bexar County districtScore 90
≈0 bars & nightlife venues nearby
≈1,354 residents aged 18-24
North San Antonio Hillsin the Magnolia Heights districtScore 90
≈0 bars & nightlife venues nearby
≈1,470 residents aged 18-24
How this query was built
The 18-24 count ranked high against mapped bar and nightlife venues ranked low. It points at a young resident base with thin evening provision.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
bar and nightlife competition
lower
45%
Count of all mapped bar and nightlife venues, scored inverted so thinner presence ranks higher.
residents aged 18-24
higher
55%
The 18-19, 20, 21 and 22-24 male and female cells of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
Residents are not customers — nightlife draws people from across a city, so a residential area with few bars may simply be where people sleep rather than where they go out. Licensing and zoning are not in the data.
Try changing it
· Add pedestrian street length to favour areas that can carry evening footfall.
· Swap the age band for 25-39 to move the customer profile older.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks each block in San Antonio based on two factors: bar and nightlife competition (lower ranks higher, weighted 0.45) and the number of residents aged 18-24 (higher ranks higher, weighted 0.55). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Lackland Terrace is ranked #1 with a score of 93.5/100, encompassing 37 blocks. This area has approximately 1 bars & nightlife venue nearby and approximately 2,069 residents aged 18-24. Northwest ranks #2 with a score of 93.1/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 2 bars & nightlife venues nearby and approximately 6,020 residents aged 18-24. Northwest Crossing ranks #3 with a score of 90.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 0 bars & nightlife venues nearby and approximately 1,294 residents aged 18-24. Northwest Los Angeles Heights (Bexar County) ranks #4 with a score of 90/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 0 bars & nightlife venues nearby and approximately 1,354 residents aged 18-24. North San Antonio Hills (Magnolia Heights) ranks #5 with a score of 89.7/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 0 bars & nightlife venues nearby and approximately 1,470 residents aged 18-24.
Fields scored: bar and nightlife competition and residents aged 18-24. 8,855 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do older residents and pharmacies coincide in San Antonio?
Overlap index — 2020 Census residents aged 65+ ranked with mapped pharmacy presence
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Phoenix, King Williams District, and South Side. Phoenix leads with a score of 62.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,225 residents aged 65 and over and ≈5 pharmacies nearby. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 65-and-over count ranked alongside mapped pharmacies, both high. It shows where an older population already has pharmacy provision nearby — useful for services that want to co-locate rather than fill a gap.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
pharmacy
higher
35%
Count of mapped pharmacies in the hex.
residents aged 65 and over
higher
65%
Every 65-and-over male and female cell of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It says nothing about health status, prescription volume or whether those pharmacies are accessible to the people counted. Invert the pharmacy term to look for thin provision instead.
Try changing it
· Invert the pharmacy weight to search for thin provision instead of co-location.
· Swap the 65-plus count for the group-quarters count to find care facilities.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on the presence of pharmacies (weighted 0.35) and residents aged 65 and over (weighted 0.65). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Phoenix ranks #1 with a score of 62.3/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈2,225 residents aged 65 and over and ≈5 pharmacies nearby. King Williams District ranks #2 with a score of 60.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,073 residents aged 65 and over and ≈10 pharmacies nearby. South Side ranks #3 with a score of 59.2/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈2,075 residents aged 65 and over and ≈3 pharmacies nearby. Leon Valley ranks #4 with a score of 58.6/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈2,231 residents aged 65 and over and ≈2 pharmacies nearby. Monte Vista Historical District ranks #5 with a score of 57.8/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈2,156 residents aged 65 and over and ≈2 pharmacies nearby.
Fields scored: pharmacy and residents aged 65 and over. 8,834 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do residents aged 18 to 24 live in San Antonio?
Residents aged 18-24 on 1 April 2020 — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Northwest (north-west), Lackland Terrace and Uptown Central. Northwest (north-west) leads with a score of 91.7/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈6,020 residents aged 18-24. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Four short-span cells per sex from the 2020 Census sex-by-age table, summed. This is the university and early-career band, stated as the band the census actually counted.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
residents aged 18-24
higher
100%
The 18-19, 20, 21 and 22-24 male and female cells of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It does not identify students — the census extract carries no school enrolment table, and a hex with a large dormitory shows up here through the group-quarters population without being labelled as such.
Try changing it
· Add education venues to see which of these areas already have campuses and schools nearby.
· Add the group-quarters count to separate dormitory concentrations from private households.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on residents aged 18-24 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below. Northwest (north-west) ranks #1 with a score of 91.7/100 across 37 blocks: ≈6,020 residents aged 18-24. Lackland Terrace ranks #2 with a score of 90.3/100 across 37 blocks: ≈2,069 residents aged 18-24. Uptown Central ranks #3 with a score of 84.4/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,346 residents aged 18-24. Alta Vista ranks #4 with a score of 82.9/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,374 residents aged 18-24. Northwest (north-west 2) ranks #5 with a score of 82.9/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,983 residents aged 18-24. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: residents aged 18-24. 8,855 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do residents aged 25 to 39 live in San Antonio?
Residents aged 25-39 on 1 April 2020 — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Lackland Terrace, Leon Valley, and Northwest. Lackland Terrace leads with a score of 89/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈3,647 residents aged 25-39. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 2020 Census publishes sex crossed with 23 age bands as a 100% count, so this is a sum of six published cells rather than an estimate. The band is stated literally instead of as a generation label: cohort names do not line up with census bands, and the band is what was actually counted.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
residents aged 25-39
higher
100%
The 25-29, 30-34 and 35-39 male and female cells of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about income, occupation, tenure or how long these residents have lived here. It is a single snapshot from April 2020 and says nothing about how the area has changed.
Try changing it
· Swap in the 18-24 band to compare where the two age groups sit.
· Add household income brackets to see where the two overlap, as an overlap rather than a statement about these residents.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on residents aged 25-39 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Lackland Terrace ranks #1 with a score of 89/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3,647 residents aged 25-39. Leon Valley ranks #2 with a score of 87.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈5,049 residents aged 25-39. Northwest ranks #3 with a score of 86.9/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈5,627 residents aged 25-39. Northwest Crossing ranks #4 with a score of 86.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3,204 residents aged 25-39. Northeast ranks #5 with a score of 84.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈4,353 residents aged 25-39.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: residents aged 25-39. 8,857 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do residents aged 65 and over live in San Antonio?
Residents aged 65+ on 1 April 2020 — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, areas with the most residents aged 65 and over include Palm Heights (Bexar County), Lavaca, and King Williams District. Palm Heights (Bexar County) has a score of 90.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,225 residents aged 65 and over. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Twelve published cells — six age spans per sex from 65-66 up to 85 and over — summed into one count. A 100% enumeration, not an estimate.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
residents aged 65 and over
higher
100%
Every 65-and-over male and female cell of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table, from 65-66 through 85 and over, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about health, mobility, care needs or income, and it does not separate people living independently from those in nursing facilities: the group-quarters population is part of this count.
Try changing it
· Add pharmacies to weigh this population against existing health-service presence.
· Add the group-quarters count to see where institutional populations drive the total.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on residents aged 65 and over, with higher ranks indicating more residents (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Palm Heights (Bexar County) ranks #1 with a score of 90.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,225 residents aged 65 and over. Lavaca ranks #2 with a score of 88.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,075 residents aged 65 and over. King Williams District ranks #3 with a score of 88/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,082 residents aged 65 and over. Monte Vista Historical District ranks #4 with a score of 87.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,156 residents aged 65 and over. West Side ranks #5 with a score of 87.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,231 residents aged 65 and over.
Fields scored: residents aged 65 and over. 8,834 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Female residents aged 25-39 on 1 April 2020 — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest scores for women aged 25-39 are Lackland Terrace, Leon Valley, and North San Antonio Hills. Lackland Terrace leads with a score of 88.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 1,833 women aged 25-39. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 2020 Census crosses sex with age directly, so "women aged 25-39" is a sum of three published cells rather than an inference from two separate distributions. Most national censuses do not publish this crossing at all.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
women aged 25-39
higher
100%
The female 25-29, 30-34 and 35-39 cells of the 2020 Census sex-by-age cross-tabulation, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about income, parenthood, employment or household composition — those live in separate tables that are not crossed with sex and age.
Try changing it
· Compare against families with young children to see where the two coincide, as an overlap.
· Swap the age band to move the profile older or younger.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on the presence of women aged 25-39, with higher ranks indicating a greater presence (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Lackland Terrace ranks #1 with a score of 88.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 1,833 women aged 25-39. Leon Valley ranks #2 with a score of 88/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 2,588 women aged 25-39. North San Antonio Hills ranks #3 with a score of 86.9/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 1,636 women aged 25-39. Northwest ranks #4 with a score of 86.1/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 2,629 women aged 25-39. Robards ranks #5 with a score of 83.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 2,147 women aged 25-39.
Fields scored: women aged 25-39. 8,850 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do families with children and family amenities coincide in San Antonio?
Overlap index — ACS 2018-2022 families with children under 18 ranked with parks and fitness venues
In San Antonio, Stone Oak, Northwest, and Robards are the highest-ranking areas. Stone Oak leads with a score of 59/100 across 37 blocks. This area shows ≈933 residents aged 0–17 and ≈8 active life & fitness venues nearby. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Families with own children under 18 ranked alongside mapped active-life venues — parks, playgrounds, pools, gyms — both high, so the index favours areas where family households already have somewhere to go.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
active life
higher
40%
Count of all mapped parks, playgrounds, gyms and other active-life venues in the hex.
Married-couple family: With own children of the householder under 18 years
higher
60%
The "married-couple family: with own children under 18" cell of the ACS 2018-2022 family table.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about school quality, safety or park condition, none of which is in the data. Venue counts carry no size: one large park counts as one.
Try changing it
· Invert the venue weight to search for family areas with thin provision instead.
· Swap in children under six to focus on early-years households.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on active life (higher ranks higher, weight 0.4) and Married-couple family: With own children of the householder under 18 years (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Stone Oak ranks #1 with a score of 59/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈933 residents aged 0–17 and ≈8 active life & fitness venues nearby. Northwest ranks #2 with a score of 56.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈934 residents aged 0–17 and ≈7 active life & fitness venues nearby. Robards ranks #3 with a score of 56.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈877 residents aged 0–17 and ≈11 active life & fitness venues nearby. North San Antonio Hills ranks #4 with a score of 56.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,196 residents aged 0–17 and ≈3 active life & fitness venues nearby. High Country ranks #5 with a score of 55.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈857 residents aged 0–17 and ≈5 active life & fitness venues nearby.
Fields scored: active life and Married-couple family: With own children of the householder under 18 years (2022). 8,856 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Residents under 5 years old on 1 April 2020 — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Lackland Terrace, Alta Vista and North San Antonio Hills. Lackland Terrace leads with a score of 89.4/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈1,077 children under 5. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The under-5 male and female cells of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table. A 100% count of the youngest residents, which is the demand base for childcare, pediatric services and family retail.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
children under 5
higher
100%
The male and female under-5 cells of the 2020 Census sex-by-age table.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about whether those children are in paid childcare, nothing about their household's income, and nothing about the supply of childcare places nearby.
Try changing it
· Add education venues to weigh this demand against existing provision.
· Swap in families with own children under 18 to widen the age range.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on children under 5 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Lackland Terrace ranks #1 with a score of 89.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,077 children under 5. Alta Vista ranks #2 with a score of 86.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈962 children under 5. North San Antonio Hills ranks #3 with a score of 85.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈872 children under 5. North Central ranks #4 with a score of 84/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈866 children under 5. El Charro ranks #5 with a score of 82.9/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,177 children under 5.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: children under 5. 8,846 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do families with children under six live in San Antonio?
Children under 6 living in families — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are North Central, Lackland Terrace and Northwest. North Central leads with a score of 89.9/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈1,395 children under 6 in families. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The ACS children-in-households table crosses family type with the child's age band, so the under-3, 3-4 and 5-year-old cells can be summed across married-couple and single-householder families into one pre-school count.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
children under 6 in families
higher
100%
The under-3, 3-4 and 5-year-old cells across married-couple, male-householder and female-householder families in the ACS 2018-2022 children-in-households table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It counts children, not families, so an area with fewer larger families can outrank one with more small ones. It says nothing about childcare enrolment or supply.
Try changing it
· Add education venues to weigh this demand against existing provision.
· Compare against the 2020 Census under-5 count, which is a 100% enumeration.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
The areas below are formed by ranking every block in San Antonio based on children under 6 in families (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then grouping the top-scoring blocks.
North Central ranks #1, with a score of 89.9/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,395 children under 6 in families. Lackland Terrace ranks #2, with a score of 89.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,248 children under 6 in families. Northwest ranks #3, with a score of 88/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,354 children under 6 in families. Great Northwest ranks #4, with a score of 87.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈983 children under 6 in families. El Charro ranks #5, with a score of 87.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,630 children under 6 in families.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: children under 6 in families. 8,855 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do grandchildren under 18 live with their grandparents in San Antonio?
Grandchildren under 18 in the householder's home — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Bexar County, West Side, and San Juan Gardens (Bexar County). Bexar County leads with a score of 93.1/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈770 residents aged 0–17. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
A published cell of the 2020 Census relationship table: people under 18 living in a household headed by their grandparent. It is the clearest multigenerational-household signal the US extract carries.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
In households: Grandchild: Under 18 years
higher
100%
The "grandchild, under 18 years" cell of the 2020 Census relationship table — a 100% count.
What this can’t tell you
It does not say whether a parent is also present, nor anything about guardianship, income or the reason for the arrangement.
Try changing it
· Add residents aged 65 and over to see where older householders concentrate.
· Compare against single-parent families for a fuller picture of caregiving arrangements.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This map ranks every block in San Antonio based on the presence of grandchildren under 18 years old in households, with higher ranks indicating more such households (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Bexar County ranks #1 with a score of 93.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈770 residents aged 0–17. West Side ranks #2 with a score of 92.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈699 residents aged 0–17. San Juan Gardens (Bexar County) ranks #3 with a score of 92.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈694 residents aged 0–17. Northwest Los Angeles Heights (Bexar County) ranks #4 with a score of 91.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈653 residents aged 0–17. Thelka (Bexar County) ranks #5 with a score of 91.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈685 residents aged 0–17.
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: In households: Grandchild: Under 18 years (2020). 8,795 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do married couples with children under 18 live in San Antonio?
Married-couple families with own children under 18 — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest scores are Lakeview, Great Northwest, and North Central. Lakeview leads with a score of 90.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 1,171 residents aged 0–17. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The ACS family table crosses family type with the presence and age of own children, so "married couple with own children under 18" is a published cell rather than two counts laid over each other.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Married-couple family: With own children of the householder under 18 years
higher
100%
The "married-couple family: with own children of the householder under 18 years" cell of the ACS 2018-2022 family table.
What this can’t tell you
"Own children" means the householder's own children, so it excludes stepchildren and other children in the home. It says nothing about income, schooling or how many children each family has.
Try changing it
· Swap in single-parent families to compare the two family forms.
· Add education venues to weigh family presence against schooling and childcare supply.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query identifies areas in San Antonio by ranking blocks based on the presence of married-couple families with their own children under 18 years, giving this factor a weight of 0.9. The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Lakeview ranks #1 with a score of 90.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 1,171 residents aged 0–17. Great Northwest ranks #2 with a score of 90.2/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 1,015 residents aged 0–17. North Central (Bexar County) ranks #3 with a score of 88.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 1,151 residents aged 0–17. Stone Oak (Bexar County) ranks #4 with a score of 88/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 933 residents aged 0–17. Timber Ridge (Bexar County) ranks #5 with a score of 87.6/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 1,004 residents aged 0–17.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped when they are within a 1,200 m radius of each other.
Fields scored: Married-couple family: With own children of the householder under 18 years (2022). 8,856 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where are never-married residents concentrated in San Antonio?
Residents 15 and over who have never married — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest scores for never-married residents are Monte Vista Historical District, Lackland Terrace, and Northwest (north). Monte Vista Historical District leads with a score of 90.6/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈5,322 never-married residents. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The ACS marital-status table crosses sex with marital status, so the male and female never-married cells sum to a single published count. Its universe is residents aged 15 and over.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
never-married residents
higher
100%
The male and female "never married" cells of the ACS 2018-2022 marital-status table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It is a five-year sample estimate at block-group scale, so small areas carry a wide margin of error. Never-married is not the same as single or living alone — cohabiting partners are counted here too.
Try changing it
· Compare against householders living alone, which is a 100% count from a different table.
· Add nightlife venues to see where this population and social venues coincide.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on never-married residents, with higher numbers receiving higher ranks (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into distinct areas.
Monte Vista Historical District ranks #1 with a score of 90.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈5,322 never-married residents. Lackland Terrace ranks #2 with a score of 88.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈4,875 never-married residents. Northwest (north) ranks #3 with a score of 87.9/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈6,616 never-married residents. North Central ranks #4 with a score of 87.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈4,646 never-married residents. Northwest (north-west) ranks #5 with a score of 86/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈6,656 never-married residents.
Fields scored: never-married residents. 8,858 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Northwest, Leon Valley, and Midtown. Northwest leads with a score of 93.4/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈3,306 residents (nonfamily households: 1-person household). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The ACS household-size table crosses family status with size, and a one-person household is non-family by definition, so this is a single published cell.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Nonfamily households: 1-person household
higher
100%
The "non-family households: 1-person household" cell of the ACS 2018-2022 household-size table.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about the age or income of the occupant, and nothing about whether the arrangement is by choice. It is a sample estimate, so small areas carry a wide margin of error.
Try changing it
· Compare against householders living alone, a 100% count of the same idea from the 2020 Census.
· Add the smallest homes to see where small households and small homes coincide.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on Nonfamily households: 1-person household (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Northwest ranks #1 with a score of 93.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3,306 residents (nonfamily households: 1-person household). Leon Valley ranks #2 with a score of 91.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3,079 residents (nonfamily households: 1-person household). Midtown ranks #3 with a score of 90.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,150 residents (nonfamily households: 1-person household). Bexar County ranks #4 with a score of 89.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3,402 residents (nonfamily households: 1-person household). Vance Jackson ranks #5 with a score of 88/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,633 residents (nonfamily households: 1-person household).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Nonfamily households: 1-person household (2022). 8,858 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where are people living alone concentrated in San Antonio?
Householders living alone on 1 April 2020 — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest scores are Bexar County, Northwest (north-west), and Robards. Bexar County leads with a score of 92.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 3,123 householders living alone. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 2020 Census relationship table crosses householder status with sex and with living alone, so this is a published cell rather than something inferred by overlaying household size onto a population count.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
householders living alone
higher
100%
The male and female "householder living alone" cells of the 2020 Census relationship table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about age, income or whether living alone is by choice. It counts householders, so it excludes anyone living alone in group quarters.
Try changing it
· Add eat-and-drink venues to see where solo living and everyday amenities coincide.
· Compare against residents aged 65 and over to see where the two overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on the number of householders living alone (higher ranks indicate more householders living alone, with a weight of 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Bexar County ranks #1 with a score of 92.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 3,123 householders living alone. Northwest (north-west) ranks #2 with a score of 90.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 3,232 householders living alone. Robards ranks #3 with a score of 88.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 2,855 householders living alone. Monte Vista Historical District ranks #4 with a score of 88.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 1,958 householders living alone. Northwest (north) ranks #5 with a score of 86.7/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 2,191 householders living alone.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: householders living alone. 8,839 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Same-sex spouses and unmarried partners on 1 April 2020 — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Monte Vista, Bexar County (north), and Bexar County (north-west). Monte Vista leads with a score of 89.6/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈122 same-sex spouses and unmarried partners. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 2020 Census was the first to publish same-sex spouses and same-sex unmarried partners as their own cells rather than folding them into an unmarried-partner total. Both are summed here, so the count covers married and cohabiting couples alike.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
same-sex spouses and unmarried partners
higher
100%
The same-sex spouse and same-sex unmarried-partner cells of the 2020 Census relationship table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It counts partners in couple households only, so it is not a measure of the wider LGBTQ+ population, which the census does not enumerate. It says nothing about income, age or how long anyone has lived here.
Try changing it
· Add eat-and-drink or nightlife venues to see where these households and social venues coincide.
· Compare against householders living alone to contrast household forms.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on same-sex spouses and unmarried partners (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Monte Vista ranks #1 with a score of 89.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈122 same-sex spouses and unmarried partners. Bexar County (north) ranks #2 with a score of 89.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈116 same-sex spouses and unmarried partners. Bexar County (north-west) ranks #3 with a score of 87.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈133 same-sex spouses and unmarried partners. Leon Valley ranks #4 with a score of 84.9/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈121 same-sex spouses and unmarried partners. Uptown Central ranks #5 with a score of 84.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈93 same-sex spouses and unmarried partners.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: same-sex spouses and unmarried partners. 8,791 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do single-parent families live in San Antonio?
Families with one householder, no spouse present, and own children under 18 — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest concentration of single-parent families are West Side (south), West Side (west), and West Side (west 2). West Side (south) ranks highest with a score of 92.1/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 1,383 single-parent families. Each identified area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Male-householder and female-householder families with no spouse present and own children under 18 are published as separate cells; both are summed here so the count covers single fathers and single mothers alike.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
single-parent families
higher
100%
The male- and female-householder "no spouse present, with own children under 18" cells of the ACS 2018-2022 family table, summed.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about income, working hours or support networks, and it does not capture a single parent living in someone else's household — the table counts families by their householder.
Try changing it
· Add education venues to see which of these areas already have childcare and schooling nearby.
· Compare against grandchildren living with grandparents for a fuller caregiving picture.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on the presence of single-parent families, with higher ranks indicating a greater presence (weighted at 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
West Side (south) ranks #1 with a score of 92.1/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 1,383 single-parent families. West Side (west) ranks #2 with a score of 86.3/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 702 single-parent families. West Side (west 2) ranks #3 with a score of 86.3/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 781 single-parent families. Following these, Lackland Terrace ranks #4 with a score of 86.1/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 771 single-parent families, and Northmoor ranks #5 with a score of 85.7/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 766 single-parent families.
Fields scored: single-parent families. 8,854 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which parts of San Antonio have the largest households?
Households of seven or more people — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, Monte Vista Historical District, El Charro (Bexar County), and Valley Hi are the highest-ranking areas. Monte Vista Historical District leads with a score of 94.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 253 households of 7 or more people. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Seven-or-more is the top band of the ACS household-size table. Family and non-family households are published separately at that size and are summed here, so the count covers both.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
households of 7 or more people
higher
100%
The family and non-family "7-or-more person household" cells of the ACS 2018-2022 household-size table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It does not distinguish a large family from a shared house, and it says nothing about crowding — the number of rooms is a separate table that is not crossed with household size.
Try changing it
· Add homes with seven or more rooms to compare household size against home size, as an overlap.
· Compare against families with own children under 18.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on the presence of households with 7 or more people, where a higher rank indicates more such households (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Monte Vista Historical District ranks #1 with a score of 94.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 253 households of 7 or more people. El Charro (Bexar County) ranks #2 with a score of 93.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 250 households of 7 or more people. Valley Hi ranks #3 with a score of 90.9/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 175 households of 7 or more people. Phoenix ranks #4 with a score of 88.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 211 households of 7 or more people. North Central ranks #5 with a score of 87.8/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 221 households of 7 or more people.
Fields scored: households of 7 or more people. 8,810 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which San Antonio areas have many young children but few childcare and school venues?
Gap index — ACS 2018-2022 children under 6 ranked against mapped education venues
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Great Northwest (north-west), Lackland Terrace and Great Northwest (north-west 2). Great Northwest (north-west) leads with a score of 91/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈2 education venues nearby and ≈983 children under 6 in families. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Great Northwest (north-west)also spans Great NorthwestScore 91
Children under six ranked high against mapped education and childcare venues ranked low. It is the demand-versus-provision view for early-years services.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
education competition
lower
45%
Count of all mapped education and childcare venues, scored inverted so thinner presence ranks higher.
children under 6 in families
higher
55%
The under-3, 3-4 and 5-year-old cells across all family types in the ACS 2018-2022 children-in-households table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
Mapped venue counts carry no capacity, no waiting lists and no licensing, so a single large nursery counts the same as a small one. Thin mapped presence is not proof that provision is missing.
Try changing it
· Swap in single-parent families to focus on households likelier to need full-day care.
· Raise the venue weight to prioritise areas with the thinnest existing provision.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on education competition (lower ranks higher, with a weight of 0.45) and the number of children under 6 in families (higher ranks higher, with a weight of 0.55). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Great Northwest (north-west) ranks #1 with a score of 91/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2 education venues nearby and ≈983 children under 6 in families. Lackland Terrace ranks #2 with a score of 88.9/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈4 education venues nearby and ≈1,111 children under 6 in families. Great Northwest (north-west 2) ranks #3 with a score of 88.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈3 education venues nearby and ≈844 children under 6 in families. North Central ranks #4 with a score of 88.1/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈5 education venues nearby and ≈1,063 children under 6 in families. El Charro ranks #5 with a score of 87.9/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈6 education venues nearby and ≈1,265 children under 6 in families.
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: education competition and children under 6 in families. 8,855 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do rental housing and transit access coincide in San Antonio?
Overlap index — 2020 Census renter-occupied units ranked with transit stop density
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Bexar County (north-west), Bexar County (north-west 2), and Robards. Bexar County (north-west) leads with a score of 54.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈6,178 residents (renter occupied) and ≈0 transit stops. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Bexar County (north-west)in the Bexar County districtalso spans Bexar CountyScore 55
≈6,178 residents (renter occupied)
≈0 transit stops
Bexar County (north-west 2)in the Bexar County districtalso spans Bexar CountyScore 54
Avenida Guadalupein the Bexar County districtScore 50
≈2,492 residents (renter occupied)
≈0 transit stops
How this query was built
Renter-occupied units ranked alongside transit stop density, both high. Renters are more transit-dependent than owners on average, so this is the combination a rental platform or build-to-rent operator cares about.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
transit stop count
higher
40%
Count of transit stops reachable from the hex.
Renter occupied
higher
60%
The "renter occupied" cell of the 2020 Census tenure table — a 100% count of occupied units.
What this can’t tell you
It cannot say the renters use the transit — the US extract carries no commute-mode table. Stop count is not frequency, and tenure counts units rather than households.
Try changing it
· Add pedestrian street length to weigh walkability alongside transit.
· Swap renter-occupied units for large apartment buildings to focus on dense stock.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.4) and Renter occupied (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
Bexar County (north-west) ranks #1 with a score of 54.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈6,178 residents (renter occupied) and ≈0 transit stops. Bexar County (north-west 2) ranks #2 with a score of 54.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈5,313 residents (renter occupied) and ≈0 transit stops. Robards ranks #3 with a score of 52.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈5,488 residents (renter occupied) and ≈0 transit stops. Northwest ranks #4 with a score of 51.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈5,061 residents (renter occupied) and ≈0 transit stops. Avenida Guadalupe ranks #5 with a score of 50.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,492 residents (renter occupied) and ≈0 transit stops.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: transit stop count and Renter occupied (2020). 8,825 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Housing units owned free and clear, with no mortgage — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest scores for residents who own their homes free and clear are Palm Heights (Bexar County), West Side (south-east), and West Side (south-west). Palm Heights (Bexar County) has the highest score at 91.9/100 across 37 blocks, representing approximately 1,542 residents. Each area consists of a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
A published cell of the 2020 Census tenure table: occupied units whose owner carries no mortgage or loan. It is a 100% count and a distinct signal from ownership generally.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Owned free and clear
higher
100%
The "owned free and clear" cell of the 2020 Census tenure table — occupied units with no mortgage.
What this can’t tell you
Mortgage-free does not mean high income or high value — it tracks longer tenure and older owners, and the census carries no owner age, so that reading is not available here.
Try changing it
· Compare against residents aged 65 and over, as an overlap rather than a claim about owners.
· Add home value brackets to separate high-value outright ownership from the rest.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on the number of residents who own their homes free and clear (with a weight of 0.9 for higher scores), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas listed below.
Palm Heights (Bexar County) ranks #1 with a score of 91.9/100 across 37 blocks, representing approximately 1,542 residents who own their homes free and clear. West Side (south-east) ranks #2 with a score of 91.4/100 across 37 blocks, representing approximately 1,571 residents. West Side (south-west) ranks #3 with a score of 88.7/100 across 37 blocks, representing approximately 1,644 residents. Columbia Heights ranks #4 with a score of 87.5/100 across 37 blocks, representing approximately 1,224 residents. Third World (Bexar County) ranks #5 with a score of 86.8/100 across 37 blocks, representing approximately 1,214 residents.
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Owned free and clear (2020). 8,803 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where are San Antonio's large apartment buildings?
Housing units in structures of 50 or more units — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Downtown, Bexar County, and Leon Valley. Downtown leads with a score of 97.5/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈2,461 residents (50 or more). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The top band of the ACS units-in-structure table: homes in buildings with 50 or more units. It is the closest thing the extract has to a high-rise measure.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
50 or more
higher
100%
The "50 or more units" cell of the ACS 2018-2022 units-in-structure table.
What this can’t tell you
Unit count is not height — a 50-unit walk-up complex and a tower both land here. It says nothing about tenure, rent or building age.
Try changing it
· Add transit stops to see where dense housing and transit access coincide, as an index.
· Add renter-occupied units to see how much of this stock is rented.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on 50 or more (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Downtown ranks #1 with a score of 97.5/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈2,461 residents (50 or more). Bexar County ranks #2, scoring 95.2/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈1,225 residents (50 or more). Leon Valley ranks #3, scoring 94.2/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈1,541 residents (50 or more). Southtown ranks #4, scoring 92.8/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈1,155 residents (50 or more). Lackland Terrace ranks #5, scoring 92.2/100 across 36 blocks, with ≈824 residents (50 or more).
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: 50 or more (2022). 8,776 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where is owner-occupied housing concentrated in San Antonio?
Owner-occupied housing units, mortgaged and owned outright — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, Northwest Crossing, Braun's Farm, and Bexar County are top-ranked areas. Northwest Crossing leads with a score of 93.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 3,848 owner-occupied units. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 2020 Census splits ownership into units held with a mortgage and units owned free and clear. Both are summed here, because owner-occupied means both — taking only the mortgaged cell would miss outright owners entirely.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
owner-occupied units
higher
100%
The "owned with a mortgage or a loan" and "owned free and clear" cells of the 2020 Census tenure table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
It counts units, not owners, and says nothing about home value, equity or how long the owner has been there.
Try changing it
· Swap in units owned free and clear to isolate mortgage-free ownership.
· Add home value brackets to see where ownership and high-value housing coincide.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on owner-occupied units, with higher numbers receiving higher ranks (weighted 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Northwest Crossing ranks #1 with a score of 93.8/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 3,848 owner-occupied units. Braun's Farm ranks #2 with a score of 89.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 3,216 owner-occupied units. Bexar County ranks #3 with a score of 88.4/100 across 37 blocks, with approximately 3,161 owner-occupied units. Heritage ranks #4 with a score of 87.9/100 across 37 blocks, containing approximately 3,069 owner-occupied units. North Central ranks #5 with a score of 86.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing approximately 2,903 owner-occupied units.
Each area is identified as a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped together if they fall within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: owner-occupied units. 8,836 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Housing units built in 1939 or earlier — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Monte Vista Historical District, Lavaca and Keystone Park. Monte Vista Historical District leads with a score of 98.9/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈2,766 residents (built 1939 or earlier). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The oldest band of the ACS year-built table. It is the standard US shorthand for pre-war stock and a strong signal for renovation, insulation and heritage-related demand.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Built 1939 or earlier
higher
100%
The 1939-or-earlier cell of the ACS 2018-2022 year-built table.
What this can’t tell you
Build year says nothing about condition, renovation history or whether a building is protected. Year built is reported for the structure, not for individual units.
Try changing it
· Add home value brackets to find older housing in high-value areas.
· Swap in housing built 2010 or later for the newest stock.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on Built 1939 or earlier (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Monte Vista Historical District ranks #1 with a score of 98.9/100 across 37 blocks: ≈2,766 residents (built 1939 or earlier). Lavaca ranks #2 with a score of 97.9/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,879 residents (built 1939 or earlier). Keystone Park ranks #3 with a score of 97.6/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,786 residents (built 1939 or earlier). Prospect Hill (Bexar County) ranks #4 with a score of 97.2/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,631 residents (built 1939 or earlier). Southtown ranks #5 with a score of 97.2/100 across 37 blocks: ≈1,699 residents (built 1939 or earlier).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Built 1939 or earlier (2022). 8,719 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where is renter-occupied housing concentrated in San Antonio?
Renter-occupied housing units — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas for renter-occupied residents are Bexar County (north-west), Bexar County (north-west 2), and Robards. Bexar County (north-west) leads with a score of 90.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈6,178 residents (renter occupied). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Bexar County (north-west)in the Bexar County districtalso spans Bexar CountyScore 91
≈6,178 residents (renter occupied)
Bexar County (north-west 2)in the Bexar County districtalso spans Bexar CountyScore 90
Avenida Guadalupein the Bexar County districtScore 84
≈2,492 residents (renter occupied)
How this query was built
A single cell of the 2020 Census tenure table, counted for every occupied housing unit rather than estimated from a sample. Tenure is one of the few housing questions asked of everyone.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Renter occupied
higher
100%
The "renter occupied" cell of the 2020 Census tenure table — a 100% count of occupied housing units.
What this can’t tell you
It counts units, not people, and says nothing about rent levels, lease type or whether a unit is rent-stabilised.
Try changing it
· Swap in owner-occupied units to see the opposite pattern.
· Add transit stops to see where rental housing and transit access coincide, as an index.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on renter-occupied residents, with higher ranks indicating more renter-occupied residents (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Bexar County (north-west) ranks #1 with a score of 90.8/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈6,178 residents (renter occupied). Bexar County (north-west 2) ranks #2 with a score of 90.1/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈5,313 residents (renter occupied). Robards ranks #3 with a score of 87.8/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈5,488 residents (renter occupied). Northwest ranks #4 with a score of 86.1/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈5,061 residents (renter occupied). Avenida Guadalupe ranks #5 with a score of 83.9/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈2,492 residents (renter occupied).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Renter occupied (2020). 8,825 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
In San Antonio, Stone Oak, Northwest, and Salado Junction are the highest-ranking areas. Stone Oak leads with a score of 98.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing a median gross rent of €2,393. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Great Northwestin the Northwest Crossing districtScore 86
median gross rent: €1,714
How this query was built
The ACS publishes a gross rent figure per block group, covering rent plus tenant-paid utilities. As with income, the hex value is a population-weighted average of the block-group figures, so this page describes a rent level rather than quoting a neighbourhood median.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Median gross rent
higher
100%
The ACS 2018-2022 gross rent figure per block group, population-weighted onto the hex grid.
What this can’t tell you
No hex holds a median. It covers units with cash rent only, so rent-stabilised and no-cash-rent units distort the picture, and it is a five-year sample figure in 2022 dollars rather than an asking rent today.
Try changing it
· Switch to the rent-burden count to see cost pressure relative to income.
· Add transit stops to compare rent levels against transit access, as an index.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on Median gross rent, with higher rent receiving a higher rank (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Stone Oak ranks #1 with a score of 98.1/100 across 37 blocks, where the median gross rent is €2,393. Northwest ranks #2 with a score of 97.1/100 across 37 blocks, with a median gross rent of €2,140. Salado Junction ranks #3 with a score of 93.1/100 across 36 blocks, showing a median gross rent of €2,044. Bexar County ranks #4 with a score of 87/100 across 37 blocks, with a median gross rent of €1,704. Great Northwest ranks #5 with a score of 86.2/100 across 37 blocks, where the median gross rent is €1,714.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Median gross rent (2022). 8,100 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Housing units built in 2010 or later — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
Lackland Terrace, North River District, and Valley Hi are the highest-ranking areas. Lackland Terrace leads with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,224 housing units built 2010 or later. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 2020-or-later and 2010-2019 cells of the ACS year-built table, summed into a count of housing completed in the decade or so before the survey period.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
housing units built 2010 or later
higher
100%
The "built 2020 or later" and "built 2010 to 2019" cells of the ACS 2018-2022 year-built table, summed and ranked once.
What this can’t tell you
This is the age of the stock as recorded up to 2022, not construction activity and not a trend: the extract holds one survey period, so nothing here describes how an area has changed or where building is happening now.
Try changing it
· Swap in pre-1940 housing for the opposite end of the stock.
· Add home value brackets to see where new housing and high values coincide.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block on housing units built 2010 or later, with higher ranks indicating more units (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
Lackland Terrace ranks #1 with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,224 housing units built 2010 or later. North River District ranks #2 with a score of 92.9/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈2,011 housing units built 2010 or later. Valley Hi ranks #3 with a score of 89.7/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,320 housing units built 2010 or later. Bexar County ranks #4 with a score of 88.6/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,226 housing units built 2010 or later. Lakeside (Bexar County) ranks #5 with a score of 86.9/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,288 housing units built 2010 or later.
Fields scored: housing units built 2010 or later. 8,856 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Housing units with a single room — ACS 2018-2022 estimate
For San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Downtown, Midtown (Tobin Hill), and Northwest. Downtown has a score of 95.8/100 across 37 blocks, with data showing ≈656 residents (1 room). Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The ACS rooms table counts units by number of rooms; the one-room cell is the studio and single-room-occupancy stock. The US census measures home size in rooms rather than floor area.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
1 room
higher
100%
The single-room cell of the ACS 2018-2022 rooms-per-unit table.
What this can’t tell you
A room count is not floor area, and the table says nothing about who lives in these units, what they cost, or whether they are occupied.
Try changing it
· Compare against one-person households to see where small homes and small households coincide.
· Swap in homes with seven or more rooms for the opposite end of the stock.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on 1 room (higher ranks higher, with a weight of 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas listed below.
Downtown ranks #1 with a score of 95.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈656 residents (1 room). Midtown (Tobin Hill) ranks #2 with a score of 95.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈582 residents (1 room). Northwest ranks #3 with a score of 95.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈774 residents (1 room). Southtown ranks #4 with a score of 91.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈476 residents (1 room). Leon Valley ranks #5 with a score of 94.1/100 across 36 blocks, showing ≈612 residents (1 room).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: 1 room (2022). 8,791 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do residents who identified as Asian alone live in San Antonio?
Residents recorded as Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Stone Oak (Bexar County), Northwest (north-west), and Northwest (north-west 2). Stone Oak (Bexar County) leads with a score of 93.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈872 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
≈1,087 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone)
How this query was built
A published cell of the 2020 Census Hispanic-origin-by-race table, used under its own category name. "Alone" means respondents who selected a single race; people selecting two or more races are counted separately.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone
higher
100%
The "not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone" cell of the 2020 Census Hispanic-origin-by-race table.
What this can’t tell you
This is self-identified race, not nativity, citizenship, language or national origin — the US extract has no place-of-birth table — and it is not a proxy for income or cuisine preference. It also collapses very different communities into one category.
Try changing it
· Compare against the Hispanic or Latino count to see how the two categories are distributed.
· Add retail venues to compare commercial density against resident composition, as an overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on the presence of residents identified as Not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone (higher ranks indicate more presence, with a weight of 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Stone Oak (Bexar County) ranks #1 with a score of 93.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈872 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone). Northwest (north-west) ranks #2 with a score of 92.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈3,021 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone). Northwest (north-west 2) ranks #3 with a score of 91.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,177 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone). Northwest (north-west 3) ranks #4 with a score of 91.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈968 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone). Northwest (north-west 4) ranks #5 with a score of 90.4/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈1,087 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone).
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Not Hispanic or Latino: Asian alone (2020). 8,796 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do residents who identified as Black or African American alone live in San Antonio?
Residents recorded as Black or African American alone, not Hispanic or Latino — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Bexar County, Lavaca, and Northeast Crossing (Bexar County). Bexar County leads with a score of 93.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,055 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
≈1,548 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone)
How this query was built
A published cell of the 2020 Census Hispanic-origin-by-race table, used under its own category name. "Alone" means respondents who selected a single race.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone
higher
100%
The "not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone" cell of the 2020 Census Hispanic-origin-by-race table.
What this can’t tell you
This is self-identified race and nothing more. It is not a measure of nativity, income, tenure or any social outcome, and pairing it with such a measure would produce an overlap of places, never a statement about people.
Try changing it
· Compare against the Hispanic or Latino count to see how the two categories are distributed.
· View household income brackets separately rather than as a combined score.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on Not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Bexar County ranks #1 with a score of 93.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,055 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone). Lavaca ranks #2 with a score of 91.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,347 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone). Northeast Crossing (Bexar County) ranks #3 with a score of 91/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,680 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone). Huntleigh Park (Bexar County) ranks #4 with a score of 90.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈2,734 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone). Lackland Terrace ranks #5 with a score of 90.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1,548 residents (not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Not Hispanic or Latino: Black or African American alone (2020). 8,823 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where do Hispanic or Latino residents live in San Antonio?
Residents who identified as Hispanic or Latino in the 2020 Census
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Alta Vista, Phoenix, and North Central. Alta Vista leads with a score of 93.7/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈12,555 residents (hispanic or Latino). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
The 2020 Census asks Hispanic or Latino origin separately from race and publishes the two crossed, so this is a direct 100% count of everyone who identified as Hispanic or Latino, of any race.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Hispanic or Latino
higher
100%
The "Hispanic or Latino" cell of the 2020 Census Hispanic-origin-by-race table — a self-identified 100% count, of any race.
What this can’t tell you
Hispanic or Latino origin is a self-identified census category. It is not a measure of nativity, citizenship, language spoken or country of origin — the US extract carries no place-of-birth table at all — and it must not be read as a proxy for any of them, or for income.
Try changing it
· Compare against the race categories to see how origin and race intersect in each area.
· Add eat-and-drink venues to compare the local food scene against resident composition, as an overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on the presence of Hispanic or Latino residents (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Alta Vista ranks #1 with a score of 93.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈12,555 residents (hispanic or Latino). Phoenix ranks #2 with a score of 92.6/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈11,475 residents (hispanic or Latino). North Central ranks #3 with a score of 91/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈10,941 residents (hispanic or Latino).
Monte Vista Historical District ranks #4 with a score of 89.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈10,981 residents (hispanic or Latino). El Charro ranks #5 with a score of 89.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈12,986 residents (hispanic or Latino). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Hispanic or Latino (2020). 8,862 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where is it easiest to live without a car in San Antonio?
Car-light access index — transit stops, bike-share docks and car-share pickup points
In San Antonio, the University District, The Dominion, and Citizens on Alert (Bexar County) are the highest-ranking areas. The University District leads with a score of 2.7/100 across 37 blocks, featuring ≈4 transit stops, ≈0 bike-share points, and ≈0 car rental points. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Three mobility signals that substitute for car ownership: transit stops, bike-share docks, and car rental or car-share pickup points. All three are network infrastructure, so the index stays inside one universe.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
transit stop count
higher
50%
Count of transit stops reachable from the hex.
bike share count
higher
25%
Bike rental and bike parking points in the hex.
car rental count
higher
25%
Car rental and car-sharing pickup points in the hex.
What this can’t tell you
It counts infrastructure, not service — nothing about frequency, reliability, operating hours or cost. The US extract carries no vehicle-availability or commute-mode table, so this cannot be checked against how people actually travel.
Try changing it
· Add grocery stores to weigh everyday errands against mobility options.
· Raise the transit weight if fixed-route service matters more than shared vehicles.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on the count of transit stops (weighted 0.5), bike-share points (weighted 0.25), and car rental points (weighted 0.25). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
The University District ranks #1 with a score of 2.7/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈4 transit stops, ≈0 bike-share points, and ≈0 car rental points. The Dominion ranks #2 with a score of 1.4/100 across 36 blocks, with ≈0 transit stops, ≈0 bike-share points, and ≈2 car rental points. Citizens on Alert (Bexar County) ranks #3 with a score of 2.6/100 across 19 blocks, featuring ≈1 transit stops, ≈0 bike-share points, and ≈0 car rental points. Longhorn ranks #4 with a score of 1.9/100 across 26 blocks, with ≈1 transit stops, ≈0 bike-share points, and ≈0 car rental points. Phoenix ranks #5 with a score of 1.4/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈1 transit stops, ≈0 bike-share points, and ≈0 car rental points.
Fields scored: transit stop count, bike share count and car rental count. 8,669 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Walkability index — pedestrian street length ranked with transit stop density
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are University District, Citizens on Alert (Bexar County), and Longhorn. University District leads with a score of 2.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈0 km of walkable streets and ≈4 transit stops. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Two network measures from the same universe: metres of pedestrian-friendly street, and how many transit stops are within reach. Together they describe how far you can get on foot and what you can reach from there.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
pedestrian length m
higher
60%
Metres of pedestrian-friendly street in the hex.
transit stop count
higher
40%
Count of transit stops reachable from the hex.
What this can’t tell you
It measures network form, not experience — nothing about crossing safety, pavement quality, gradient, lighting or traffic. It is an index over places, not a score anyone has walked.
Try changing it
· Add eat-and-drink venues to weigh what is actually within walking distance.
· Raise the transit weight to lean the index toward public-transport access.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on pedestrian length m (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6) and transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.4). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
University District ranks #1 with a score of 2.2/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈0 km of walkable streets and ≈4 transit stops. Citizens on Alert (Bexar County) ranks #2 with a score of 2.1/100 across 19 blocks, with ≈0 km of walkable streets and ≈1 transit stops. Longhorn ranks #3 with a score of 1.5/100 across 26 blocks, with ≈0 km of walkable streets and ≈1 transit stops. Phoenix ranks #4 with a score of 1.1/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈0 km of walkable streets and ≈1 transit stops. Bexar County ranks #5 with a score of 2.5/100 across 16 blocks, with ≈0 km of walkable streets and ≈1 transit stops.
Fields scored: pedestrian length m and transit stop count. 8,669 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where are San Antonio's nightlife areas with the best transit access?
Overlap index — mapped nightlife venues ranked with transit stop density
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Alamodome District, North of Downtown, and Southtown. Alamodome District leads with a score of 34.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈68 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈4 transit stops. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Bar and nightlife venue density ranked alongside transit stop density, both high. Getting home is part of a night out, so venue clusters with strong transit are a different proposition from isolated ones.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
bar and nightlife
higher
60%
Count of all mapped bar and nightlife venues in the hex.
transit stop count
higher
40%
Count of transit stops reachable from the hex.
What this can’t tell you
Stop presence is not late-night service — the data carries no operating hours for either the venues or the transit, so a cluster served only by a daytime route ranks the same as one on a night line.
Try changing it
· Add pedestrian street length to favour walkable venue clusters.
· Swap nightlife for eat-and-drink venues to widen it to the whole evening economy.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in San Antonio based on bar and nightlife (with a weight of 0.6) and transit stop count (with a weight of 0.4). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Alamodome District ranks #1 with a score of 34.1/100 across 37 blocks, featuring ≈68 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈4 transit stops. North of Downtown ranks #2 with a score of 26.3/100 across 36 blocks, showing ≈31 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈0 transit stops. Southtown ranks #3 with a score of 19.6/100 across 24 blocks, with ≈14 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈0 transit stops. South Texas Medical Center ranks #4 with a score of 12.7/100 across 37 blocks, featuring ≈11 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈0 transit stops. Sonterra ranks #5 with a score of 9.8/100 across 36 blocks, with ≈7 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈0 transit stops.
Fields scored: bar and nightlife and transit stop count. 8,667 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Which populated parts of San Antonio have the fewest transit stops?
Coverage gap index — 2020 Census resident counts ranked against transit stop density
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are Lackland Terrace, North San Antonio Hills and Alta Vista. Lackland Terrace leads with a score of 94.4/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈0 transit stops and ≈15,528 residents (total). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Population ranked high against transit stop count ranked low, so areas with many residents and thin stop coverage rise to the top.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
transit stop count
lower
50%
Count of transit stops reachable from the hex, scored inverted so thinner coverage ranks higher.
Total
higher
50%
The 2020 Census resident count — the demand side of the blend.
What this can’t tell you
Stop count is not service: a hex with one frequent subway entrance can rank worse than one with four infrequent bus stops while being far better connected. It says nothing about frequency, span or reliability.
Try changing it
· Add pedestrian street length to weigh walk access to the stops that do exist.
· Swap residents for renter-occupied units to focus on a specific housing profile.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio on transit stop count (lower ranks higher, weight 0.5) and Total (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Lackland Terrace ranks #1 with a score of 94.4/100 across 37 blocks: ≈0 transit stops and ≈15,528 residents (total). North San Antonio Hills ranks #2 with a score of 94.1/100 across 37 blocks: ≈0 transit stops and ≈14,416 residents (total). Alta Vista ranks #3 with a score of 93.4/100 across 37 blocks: ≈0 transit stops and ≈13,610 residents (total). North Central ranks #4 with a score of 93.1/100 across 37 blocks: ≈0 transit stops and ≈13,172 residents (total). Columbia Heights ranks #5 with a score of 92.2/100 across 37 blocks: ≈0 transit stops and ≈12,535 residents (total).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: transit stop count and Total (2020). 8,862 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
In San Antonio, the areas with the highest building volume scores are University District, South Texas Medical Center, and Uptown Central. University District leads with a score of 95.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈19.5 million m³ of building volume. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
All fourteen mapped building types summed into one figure, so the answer is total built mass rather than any single use. The members are added before ranking, which is why this reads as a measurement and not as an index of separate signals.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
building volume
higher
100%
Every mapped building subtype, summed — the area's total built volume in m3.
What this can’t tell you
Volume is not population, floor area or occupancy: a warehouse and an apartment block of the same size count the same. It also says nothing about height — a wide low building can out-measure a narrow tall one — and heights are partly modelled where Overture lacks a measurement.
Try changing it
· Drop everything but residential to see where people are housed rather than where mass is.
· Swap in commercial and retail only for a view of the working city.
· Add resident counts to compare built mass against how many people it holds.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on building volume, where a higher volume results in a higher rank (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped to form the areas listed below.
University District ranks #1 with a score of 95.2/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈19.5 million m³ of building volume. South Texas Medical Center ranks #2 with a score of 89.4/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈6.9 million m³ of building volume. Uptown Central ranks #3 with a score of 87.2/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈7.9 million m³ of building volume. Bexar County ranks #4 with a score of 83.4/100 across 37 blocks, with ≈5.5 million m³ of building volume. Great Northwest ranks #5 with a score of 82.5/100 across 37 blocks, containing ≈4.9 million m³ of building volume.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: building volume. 8,667 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Where is the group-quarters population concentrated in San Antonio?
Residents in dormitories, care facilities and other group quarters — US Census 2020
In San Antonio, the highest-ranking areas are South Texas Medical Center, Stone Oak (Bexar County), and Northeast. South Texas Medical Center leads with a score of 84.1/100 across 37 blocks, where the data shows ≈292 residents (in group quarters). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Group quarters — university dormitories, nursing facilities, correctional facilities, military barracks — are counted in the population total but excluded from every household and family table. Mapping them explains why some areas carry a large population with very few households.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
In group quarters
higher
100%
The "in group quarters" cell of the 2020 Census relationship table — residents not living in private households.
What this can’t tell you
This count does not distinguish a dormitory from a care home or a correctional facility; the institutional and non-institutional split is a separate pair of cells and is not broken out here.
Try changing it
· Compare against residents aged 18-24 to find dormitory-driven concentrations.
· Compare against residents aged 65 and over to find care-facility concentrations.
All of these are adjustable on the San Antonio map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in San Antonio based on residents in group quarters (higher ranks higher, with a weight of 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
South Texas Medical Center ranks #1 with a score of 84.1/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈292 residents (in group quarters). Stone Oak (Bexar County) ranks #2 with a score of 83.3/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈268 residents (in group quarters). Northeast ranks #3 with a score of 82.8/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈140 residents (in group quarters). South Southwest (Bexar County) ranks #4 with a score of 80.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈218 residents (in group quarters). Bexar County ranks #5 with a score of 78.5/100 across 37 blocks, showing ≈269 residents (in group quarters).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: In group quarters (2020). 8,678 of 9,807 blocks in San Antonio were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-14.
Every query ranks San Antonio block by block on the fields it names, combines those ranks into a 0–100 score using the weights shown, then groups the highest-scoring blocks into areas. Sources: US Census 2020 (NHGIS). Because the score is a blend of ranks rather than a ratio, it tells you how areas compare with each other — not how many of anything there are per resident.
Each block is scored as a weighted percentile rank over available signals, renormalised by data coverage, rescaled to 0-100; blocks are H3 resolution 9 hexagons. Areas were formed with the score cluster engine at a 1.2 km radius, keeping the 5 strongest. Change the radius on the map to widen or tighten them.
Areas are only ranked where the thing being measured could actually exist, so a gap search cannot present empty parkland as an opportunity. Shops, homes and offices need a building; transit stops, EV chargers and bike docks only need a street or path. Anywhere the measure is already present counts as a candidate by definition.
Dating the numbers
The decennial census is a single-day count. Block-level age detail exists only for the census year; no official product updates it annually.
Places, buildings and transportation come from a dated Overture release. A place record means the venue is mapped, not that it is licensed, open, or of any particular size.
US Census 2020 (NHGIS) is a single vintage, so nothing here describes growth, decline or any change over time.
Counted as residents aged 25–39 on 1 April 2020, the US Census 2020 (NHGIS) reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
Counted as residents aged 18–24 on 1 April 2020, the US Census 2020 (NHGIS) reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
Counted as residents aged 65–120 on 1 April 2020, the US Census 2020 (NHGIS) reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
Counted as residents aged 0–17 on 1 April 2020, the US Census 2020 (NHGIS) reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
Counted as residents aged 0–4 on 1 April 2020, the US Census 2020 (NHGIS) reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
Counted as residents aged 0–5 on 1 April 2020, the US Census 2020 (NHGIS) reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
How far each answer can be pushed
Each question is labelled with a tier. The tier caps what the answer may claim, whatever the numbers say.
T4 — This is a ranking of places, not a measurement of people. The signals it combines are counted in different universes — the data contains no table crossing them — so a high rank means both signals rank high in the same area, not that they describe the same residents.
Builds MapBees's location-intelligence pipeline end to end — census and Overture Maps ingestion, H3 hex scoring, and the map interface — and writes the methodology behind every number on the site.
