Each question below is answered on the map type that fits it — Score, Amount, Fair share, Missing, Clusters or Variety — hex by hex. A hex is one hexagon on the map, about 350 m across (roughly 0.1 km²). Each answer leads with what the map found, lists its Standouts — the ranked groups of nearby hexes that come out on top — with the numbers behind them, and states what the data cannot tell you. The link at the end opens that exact map of Munich (München) on the same map type, so you can change the measure, the division or the comparison and get a different answer.
None of these is the only “right” way to ask. They are starting points chosen to show which measures exist for Munich (München) and how the map type you pick changes what you can honestly say.
Where should you open a new café in Munich (München)?
café demand-and-competition score — resident counts and walkable streets against existing café presence
In Munich (München), Laim, Pasing, and Neuperlach are the highest-ranking Standouts. Laim leads with a score of 82.2/100 across 44 hexes, showing ≈3 cafés nearby, ≈0.15 km of walkable streets, and ≈46,341 residents. On the Missing map, Moosach and Oberföhring are short of cafés for residents within a 10-minute walk (about 2 and 1 short).
A shortlist by 3 factors, not a site recommendation.
How this answer was built
Three factors: how many people are around, how walkable the streets are, and how many of this business type are already mapped there. The last is scored inverted, so a hex ranks high when demand factors are strong and existing presence is thin.
Measure
Direction
Importance
Why it’s here
café competition
Less is better
45%
Count of mapped cafés already trading in the hex.
pedestrian length m
More is better
25%
Meters of walkable street — a proxy for how much passing footfall a frontage can see.
Residents
More is better
30%
Published resident count — the local demand base.
What this can’t tell you
This is a shortlist, not a site recommendation. It has no rent, no footfall, no unit availability, no licensing and no catchment modeling, and a thin mapped presence is not proof that a hex is unserved.
Try changing it
· Raise the importance of the competition factor to prioritize hexes with the least existing presence.
· Swap the demand factor for the age band or household type your customers actually fall into.
· Draw your own catchment on the map to score just that area.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
The same question for other kinds of place
Same factors and importance, only the kind swapped. The Standouts are the Score map’s; the last column is where that kind is short for the people who live there, on the Missing map.
This answer ranks every hex in Munich (München) based on café competition (less is better, importance 45%), pedestrian length m (more is better, importance 25%), and Residents (more is better, importance 30%). The top-scoring hexes are grouped into the Standouts below.
Laim ranks #1 with a score of 82.2/100 across 44 hexes, showing ≈3 cafés nearby, ≈0.15 km of walkable streets, and ≈46,341 residents. Pasing (Pasing-Obermenzing) ranks #2 with a score of 76/100 across 47 hexes, showing ≈10 cafés nearby, ≈0.17 km of walkable streets, and ≈30,986 residents. Neuperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #3 with a score of 80.8/100 across 44 hexes, showing ≈3 cafés nearby, ≈0.15 km of walkable streets, and ≈35,287 residents. Moosach ranks #4 with a score of 78.9/100 across 44 hexes, showing ≈5 cafés nearby, ≈0.18 km of walkable streets, and ≈27,847 residents. Freiham (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #5 with a score of 79.1/100 across 43 hexes, showing ≈1 café nearby, ≈0.14 km of walkable streets, and ≈28,513 residents.
Each Standout is a group of high-scoring hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Factors: café competition, pedestrian length m and Residents (2022). 2,735 of 2,999 hexes in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Which neighborhoods of Munich (München) are the most walkable?
Pedestrian street length blended with transit stop count — a walkability score (Overture Maps)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking Standouts are Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt), Schwabing (Schwabing-West) and Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) leads with a score of 55.6/100 across 46 hexes, where the data shows ≈0.19 km of walkable streets and ≈26 transit stops. Each Standout is a group of high-scoring hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
A shortlist by 2 factors, not a site recommendation.
How this answer was built
Both measures describe the street and transit network, so they sit in the same universe and combine cleanly. Pedestrian length is meters of walkable way; transit stop count is mapped stops.
Measure
Direction
Importance
Why it’s here
pedestrian length m
More is better
60%
Meters of pedestrian-accessible way mapped in the hex.
transit stop count
More is better
40%
Count of mapped public transport stops.
What this can’t tell you
Network density is not pedestrian experience. It says nothing about pavement width, traffic, lighting, gradient, or how often the transit stops are actually served.
Try changing it
· Weight transit stops alone to find interchange-heavy hexes.
· Add resident counts to see where walkable network and population overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer ranks every hex in Munich (München) on pedestrian length m (more is better, importance 60%) and transit stop count (more is better, importance 40%), then groups the top-scoring hexes into the Standouts below.
Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #1 with a score of 55.6/100 across 46 hexes: ≈0.19 km of walkable streets and ≈26 transit stops. It spans Lehel. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #2 with a score of 53.7/100 across 45 hexes: ≈0.18 km of walkable streets and ≈10 transit stops. It spans Am Hart. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 55.7/100 across 43 hexes: ≈0.14 km of walkable streets and ≈30 transit stops. It spans 8.2. Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #4 with a score of 52.8/100 across 44 hexes: ≈0.16 km of walkable streets and ≈16 transit stops. It spans Giesing. Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #5 with a score of 52.9/100 across 43 hexes: ≈0.16 km of walkable streets and ≈23 transit stops. It spans Au.
Each Standout is a group of high-scoring hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Factors: pedestrian length m and transit stop count. 2,889 of 2,999 hexes in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Where is public transit densest in Munich (München)?
Mapped transit stops per km², with a Clusters map check — Overture Maps
Transit stops peak around Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt): 11 per km² (48 transit stops across 4.4 km²), against a Munich (München) figure of 1 per km². Au-Haidhausen and Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) follow at 5.3 per km² and 4.6 per km². On the Clusters map, the transit stops around Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) and Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) form a cluster the test confirms.
Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt as a whole has 36 transit stops across 4.3 km², 8.4 per km², 8.4× Munich (München)'s figure.
Au-Haidhausen as a whole has 19 transit stops across 4.5 km², 4.2 per km², 4.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Neuhausen-Nymphenburg as a whole has 19 transit stops across 12.9 km², 1.5 per km², 1.5× Munich (München)'s figure.
Schwabing-West as a whole has 10 transit stops across 4.5 km², 2.2 per km², 2.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Obergiesing-Fasangarten as a whole has 7 transit stops across 5.7 km², 1.2 per km², 1.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
A place record means it is mapped, not that it is open, licensed or of any size.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows transit stops in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #1: 11 per km² across 43 hexes (48 transit stops across 4.4 km²). Au-Haidhausen ranks #2: 5.3 per km² across 43 hexes (23 transit stops across 4.4 km²). It spans Bogenhausen. Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) ranks #3: 4.6 per km² across 43 hexes (20 transit stops across 4.4 km²). It spans 8.2. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #4: 3.4 per km² across 43 hexes (15 transit stops across 4.4 km²). Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #5: 3.2 per km² across 43 hexes (14 transit stops across 4.4 km²). It spans Sendling.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as transit stops on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Residents peak around Schwabing (Schwabing-West), with 18,296.7 per km² (79,920 residents across 4.4 km²). This compares to a Munich (München) figure of 4,845.6 per km². Isarvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) and Sendling follow, with 15,423.5 per km² and 14,751.2 per km² respectively.
Schwabing-West as a whole has 67,475 residents across 4.5 km², 15,098.1 per km², 3.1× Munich (München)'s figure.
Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt as a whole has 45,179 residents across 4.3 km², 10,584.1 per km², 2.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Sendling as a whole has 39,716 residents across 4 km², 10,018.1 per km², 2.1× Munich (München)'s figure.
Neuhausen-Nymphenburg as a whole has 95,887 residents across 12.9 km², 7,434.5 per km², 1.5× Munich (München)'s figure.
Au-Haidhausen as a whole has 60,721 residents across 4.5 km², 13,575.5 per km², 2.8× Munich (München)'s figure.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows residents in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #1, showing 18,296.7 residents per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 79,920 residents across 4.4 km². Isarvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #2, with 15,423.5 residents per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 67,421 residents across 4.4 km². Sendling ranks #3, with 14,751.2 residents per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 64,472 residents across 4.4 km². Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) ranks #4, with 14,702.3 residents per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 64,211 residents across 4.4 km². Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #5, with 12,217.7 residents per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 53,411 residents across 4.4 km².
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as residents (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Residents aged 20–29 as a share of all residents on the Amount map — the published band, counted on May 15, 2022
The highest concentration of residents aged 20–29 is found around Freimann (north-east), part of Schwabing-Freimann, with 39.2% (288 residents aged 20–29 out of 734 total). Freimann (north-east 2) and Maxvorstadt also show high concentrations, at 30.5% and 27.3% respectively.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows residents aged 20–29 in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Freimann (north-east) (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #1, with 39.2% of its population aged 20–29 across 10 hexes (288 residents aged 20–29 of 734 total). This Standout spans Freimann. Freimann (north-east 2) (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #2, with 30.5% across 16 hexes (1,639 residents aged 20–29 of 5,380 total). It also spans Freimann. Maxvorstadt ranks #3, with 27.3% across 43 hexes (10,435 residents aged 20–29 of 38,224 total), spanning Old Town. Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #4, with 25.1% across 25 hexes (3,423 residents aged 20–29 of 13,631 total). Freimann (east) (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #5, with 21.6% across 27 hexes (2,313 residents aged 20–29 of 10,712 total), spanning Freimann.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as residents aged 20–29 (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Which Munich (München) neighborhoods have the most families with children?
Couples and single parents with children as a share of all private households on the Amount map — Zensus 2022
Households with children peak around Lochhausen (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied): 55.6% (224 households with children of 402). Trudering-Riem and Fasanerie (Feldmoching-Hasenbergl) follow at 47.3% and 47%.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows households with children in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Lochhausen (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #1 with 55.6% across 14 hexes (224 households with children of 402). Trudering-Riem ranks #2 with 47.3% across 12 hexes (1,594 households with children of 3,371). Fasanerie (Feldmoching-Hasenbergl) ranks #3 with 47% across 20 hexes (521 households with children of 1,109). Feldmoching (Feldmoching-Hasenbergl) ranks #4 with 45.5% across 11 hexes (131 households with children of 288). Langwied (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #5 with 41.3% across 8 hexes (102 households with children of 246).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as households with children (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Average net cold rent per m² of housing stock on the Amount map — Zensus 2022
Rent per m² peaks around Maxvorstadt (east) (Maxvorstadt) at €16.29 per m², against a Munich (München) figure of €12.95 per m². Maxvorstadt (east 2) (Maxvorstadt) and Harlaching (Untergiesing-Harlaching) follow at €16.13 per m² and €15.74 per m².
Maxvorstadt as a whole averages €15.95 per m², 1.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Untergiesing-Harlaching as a whole averages €13.36 per m², 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Schwabing-Freimann as a whole averages €13.44 per m², 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Milbertshofen-Am Hart as a whole averages €12.24 per m², 0.9× Munich (München)'s figure.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows rent per m² in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Maxvorstadt (east) (Maxvorstadt) ranks #1 with €16.29 per m² across 41 hexes. It spans Maxvorstadt and Bogenhausen. Maxvorstadt (east 2) (Maxvorstadt) ranks #2 with €16.13 per m² across 43 hexes. It spans Maxvorstadt and Ludwigsvorstadt. Harlaching (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks #3 with €15.74 per m² across 10 hexes. Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #4 with €15.63 per m² across 32 hexes. Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #5 with €15.58 per m² across 24 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as rent per m² (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Maxvorstadt as a whole averages 13.9%, 0.4× Munich (München)'s figure.
Untergiesing-Harlaching as a whole averages 29.9%, 0.9× Munich (München)'s figure.
Altstadt-Lehel as a whole averages 15.5%, 0.5× Munich (München)'s figure.
Sendling-Westpark as a whole averages 28.8%, 0.9× Munich (München)'s figure.
Neuhausen-Nymphenburg as a whole averages 23.7%, 0.8× Munich (München)'s figure.
Compared with the whole-city figure; a per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer compares owner-occupied dwellings in every hex of Munich (München) with the city average on the Fair share map, then groups the hexes with the least into the Standouts below. Maxvorstadt ranks #1, showing 0.5× the average across 43 hexes. It spans Schwabing. Giesing ranks #2, showing 0.5× the average across 42 hexes. It spans Isarvorstadt. Au ranks #3, showing 0.5× the average across 40 hexes. It spans Haidhausen. Sendling-Westpark ranks #4, showing 0.6× the average across 37 hexes. Nymphenburg ranks #5, showing 0.5× the average across 35 hexes. Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as owner-occupied dwellings (2022) on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the least. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Which Munich (München) neighborhoods are the most internationally mixed?
How mixed the citizenships of residents are, on the Variety map — the Zensus 2022 nationality groups, which record citizenship only
The most varied mix of citizenship groups in Munich (München) is around Fasangarten: very mixed, with no single citizenship group above 63%. Milbertshofen-Am Hart and Perlach follow, with no single citizenship group above 59% and 59%.
Standout
Neighborhood
How mixed
Top kinds
Map
#1 Fasangarten
Obergiesing-Fasangarten
very mixed
German citizens 63%, EU citizens 15%, other European citizens 12%
Counts residents in each published class; it says nothing about how long they have lived here.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how mixed the citizenship groups are in every hex of Munich (München) on the Variety map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Fasangarten ranks #1 for variety: very mixed across 36 hexes (German citizens 63%, EU citizens 15%, other European citizens 12%). Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #2: very mixed across 36 hexes (German citizens 59%, EU citizens 19%, other European citizens 11%). Perlach ranks #3: very mixed across 35 hexes (German citizens 59%, other European citizens 16%, EU citizens 15%). Lerchenau ranks #4: very mixed across 34 hexes (German citizens 59%, other European citizens 16%, EU citizens 15%). Ludwigsvorstadt ranks #5: very mixed across 32 hexes (German citizens 62%, EU citizens 17%, citizens of countries outside Europe 12%).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as citizenship groups (2022) on the Variety map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where is Munich (München)'s food scene most varied?
How mixed the restaurant cuisines are, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Variety map — Overture Maps
For the most varied mix of cuisines within a 10-minute walk, explore Sendling-Westpark. It is very mixed, with no single cuisine above 33%. Isarvorstadt and Maxvorstadt also offer a very mixed selection, with no single cuisine above 40% and 44% respectively.
One hex is too small to show a mix: where any are found, only one kind is there in 59 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a mix has room to show. Counts mapped places of each kind; it says nothing about quality or price.
Full breakdown & sources
To see how varied the cuisines are in every hex of Munich (München), look at the Variety map, reading within a 10-minute walk. The Standouts below group the hexes with the most variety.
Sendling-Westpark ranks #1, showing a very mixed selection across 43 hexes (Italian 33%, German 24%, Japanese 13%). Isarvorstadt ranks #2, also very mixed across 43 hexes (Italian 40%, German 26%, Japanese 14%). Maxvorstadt ranks #3, very mixed across 43 hexes (Italian 44%, German 20%, Japanese 13%). Schwabing ranks #4, very mixed across 39 hexes (Italian 38%, German 19%, Vietnamese 17%). Sendling ranks #5, very mixed across 38 hexes (Italian 39%, German 24%, Vietnamese 17%).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as cuisines on the Variety map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Where is nightlife concentrated in Munich (München) — and is it a real cluster?
Bars and nightlife places on the Clusters map — Overture Maps
Around Ludwigsvorstadt and Sendling, bars and nightlife places form a cluster the test confirms as genuinely busy; the pattern is not chance. 262 hexes across Munich (München) test as genuinely busy.
A two-sided test with a false-discovery cut; hexes at the edge of the data are not judged.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer tests every hex of Munich (München) for bars and nightlife places against chance on the Clusters map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Ludwigsvorstadt ranks #1: genuinely busy across 43 hexes. Sendling ranks #2: genuinely busy across 43 hexes. Au ranks #3: genuinely busy across 42 hexes. Nymphenburg ranks #4: genuinely busy across 32 hexes. Schwabing ranks #5: genuinely busy across 28 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as bars and nightlife places on the Clusters map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Where are grocery stores missing for the people who live there in Munich (München)?
Mapped grocery stores within a 10-minute walk against the number Munich (München)'s rate predicts for the residents there, on the Missing map — Overture Maps and Zensus 2022
Within a 10-minute walk of Oberföhring (Bogenhausen), grocery stores fall short of Munich (München)'s rate by about 1 (2 mapped, 3 expected). Am Waldfriedhof (Hadern) and Obermenzing (Pasing-Obermenzing) are short by about 4 and 2.
One hex is too small to show a shortfall: at the Munich (München) rate, less than half of one is expected in 70 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a shortfall has room to show. Expected is modeled from the city rate. A zero means nothing mapped, never nothing there.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how many grocery stores each hex of Munich (München) is short of at the city's rate, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Missing map, then groups the hexes with the least into the Standouts below.
Oberföhring (Bogenhausen) ranks #1: short by about 1 across 43 hexes (2 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Englschalking. Am Waldfriedhof (Hadern) ranks #2: short by about 4 across 43 hexes (0 mapped, 4 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Obermenzing (Pasing-Obermenzing) ranks #3: short by about 2 across 42 hexes (2 mapped, 4 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Untermenzing. Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) ranks #4: short by about 1 across 42 hexes (0 mapped, 1 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #5: short by about 4 across 40 hexes (8 mapped, 12 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Schwabing.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as grocery stores on the Missing map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the least. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Schwabing-Freimann as a whole averages 8.6%, 1.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Allach-Untermenzing as a whole averages 12.2%, 1.7× Munich (München)'s figure.
Feldmoching-Hasenbergl as a whole averages 9.3%, 1.3× Munich (München)'s figure.
Pasing-Obermenzing as a whole averages 11.4%, 1.5× Munich (München)'s figure.
Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied as a whole averages 10.5%, 1.4× Munich (München)'s figure.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows vacant dwellings in every hex of Munich on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Freimann ranks #1: 24.8% across 11 hexes. Allach ranks #2: 21.4% across 12 hexes. Ludwigsfeld ranks #3: 20.3% across 8 hexes. Obermenzing ranks #4: 19.8% across 19 hexes. Lochhausen ranks #5: 19.7% across 7 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as vacant dwellings (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where are seniors-only households concentrated in Munich (München)?
Households where every member is 65 or older, as a share of all private households on the Amount map — Zensus 2022
Seniors-only households peak around Johanneskirchen (Bogenhausen), where 33.1% of households are seniors-only (309 of 933). Harlaching (Untergiesing-Harlaching) and Solln (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln) follow with 31% and 30.9% of households being seniors-only.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows seniors-only households in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map. The hexes with the most seniors-only households are grouped into the Standouts below.
Johanneskirchen (Bogenhausen) ranks #1, with 33.1% across 14 hexes (309 seniors-only households of 933). Harlaching (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks #2, with 31% across 15 hexes (787 seniors-only households of 2,539). Solln (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln) ranks #3, with 30.9% across 13 hexes (546 seniors-only households of 1,765). Pasing (Pasing-Obermenzing) ranks #4, with 29.8% across 33 hexes (2,648 seniors-only households of 8,875). Unterpfaffenhofen (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #5, with 29.3% across 4 hexes (48 seniors-only households of 162).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as seniors-only households (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where do you get the most living space for the rent in Munich (München)?
Living space per resident against net cold rent per m² — a space-per-euro score (Zensus 2022)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking Standouts are Obermenzing (west), Obermenzing (west 2), and Trudering-Riem. Obermenzing (west) leads with a score of 62.9/100 across 43 hexes, where the data shows average living space per resident: 61 m² and average net rent per m²: €13.25. Each Standout is a group of high-scoring hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
A shortlist by 2 factors, not a site recommendation.
How this answer was built
Floor space per resident scored up against rent per m² scored down. Both are published means over the same dwellings, so this stays inside one universe and describes the housing stock: roomy relative to what it costs.
Measure
Direction
Importance
Why it’s here
Average living space per resident
More is better
55%
Published mean dwelling floor space per resident.
Average net rent per m²
Less is better
45%
Average net cold rent per m², scored inverted so cheaper stock ranks higher.
What this can’t tell you
Neither measure describes the people living there, and more space per person is not wealth — low occupancy raises it just as large dwellings do. The rent is an average across the housing stock, not a quoted price.
Try changing it
· Drop the rent term to rank on space alone.
· Switch to living space per apartment to describe dwellings rather than occupancy.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer ranks every hex in Munich (München) on Average living space per resident (more is better, importance 55%) and Average net rent per m² (less is better, importance 45%), then groups the top-scoring hexes into the Standouts below.
Obermenzing (west) ranks #1 with a score of 62.9/100 across 43 hexes: average living space per resident: 61 m² and average net rent per m²: €13.25. Obermenzing (west 2) ranks #2 with a score of 56.2/100 across 45 hexes: average living space per resident: 54 m² and average net rent per m²: €13.2. Trudering-Riem ranks #3 with a score of 58.3/100 across 43 hexes: average living space per resident: 55 m² and average net rent per m²: €13.37. Aubing ranks #4 with a score of 56.2/100 across 44 hexes: average living space per resident: 50 m² and average net rent per m²: €12.11. Allach ranks #5 with a score of 63.2/100 across 39 hexes: average living space per resident: 55 m² and average net rent per m²: €11.89.
Each Standout is a group of high-scoring hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Factors: Average living space per resident (2022) and Average net rent per m² (2022). 2,409 of 2,999 hexes in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where are pharmacies missing for the people who live there in Munich (München)?
Mapped pharmacies within a 10-minute walk against the number Munich (München)'s rate predicts for the residents there, on the Missing map — Overture Maps and Zensus 2022
Within a 10-minute walk of Ramersdorf (Ramersdorf-Perlach), pharmacies fall short of Munich (München)'s rate by about 1 (1 mapped, 2 expected). Thalkirchen (Sendling-Westpark) and Neuperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach) are short by about 3 and 1.
One hex is too small to show a shortfall: at the Munich (München) rate, less than half of one is expected in 92 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a shortfall has room to show. Expected is modeled from the city rate. A zero means nothing mapped, never nothing there.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how many pharmacies each hex of Munich (München) is short of at the city's rate, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Missing map, then groups the hexes with the least into the Standouts below.
Ramersdorf (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #1: short by about 1 across 41 hexes (1 mapped, 2 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Perlach. Thalkirchen (Sendling-Westpark) ranks #2: short by about 3 across 39 hexes (1 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Harlaching. Neuperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #3: short by about 1 across 38 hexes (2 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Trudering-Riem. Moosach ranks #4: short by about 2 across 37 hexes (1 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Fasangarten (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks #5: short by about 1 across 35 hexes (0 mapped, 1 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as pharmacies on the Missing map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the least. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where do children under 10 live in Munich (München)?
Residents under 10 as a share of all residents on the Amount map — the published band, counted on May 15, 2022
Children under 10 are most present around Johanneskirchen: 23.6% (14 children under 10 of 59). Lochhausen follows at 18.7%, and Freiham (west) at 16.6%.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows children under 10 in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Johanneskirchen ranks #1, with 23.6% across 3 hexes (14 children under 10 of 59). Lochhausen ranks #2, with 18.7% across 8 hexes (26 children under 10 of 139). Freiham (west) ranks #3, with 16.6% across 5 hexes (91 children under 10 of 550). Feldmoching ranks #4, with 15.7% across 15 hexes (229 children under 10 of 1,458). Freiham (west 2) ranks #5, with 15.6% across 15 hexes (821 children under 10 of 5,268).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as children under 10 (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where do restaurants cluster in Munich (München), and is it a real cluster?
Mapped restaurants on the Clusters map — Overture Maps
Around Ludwigsvorstadt and Sendling, restaurants form a cluster the test confirms as genuinely busy; the pattern is not chance. 316 hexes test as genuinely busy.
A two-sided test with a false-discovery cut; hexes at the edge of the data are not judged.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer tests every hex for restaurants against chance on the Clusters map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below. Ludwigsvorstadt ranks #1: genuinely busy across 43 hexes. Sendling ranks #2: genuinely busy across 43 hexes. Au ranks #3: genuinely busy across 43 hexes. Nymphenburg ranks #4: genuinely busy across 37 hexes. Haidhausen ranks #5: genuinely busy across 33 hexes. Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as restaurants on the Clusters map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Altstadt-Lehel as a whole has 113 cafés for 19,003 residents, 11.2× Munich (München)'s rate.
Maxvorstadt as a whole has 103 cafés for 45,754 residents, 4.2× Munich (München)'s rate.
8.2 as a whole has 39 cafés for 26,675 residents, 2.8× Munich (München)'s rate.
Au-Haidhausen as a whole has 60 cafés for 60,721 residents, 1.9× Munich (München)'s rate.
Obergiesing-Fasangarten as a whole has 25 cafés for 50,339 residents, 0.9× Munich (München)'s rate.
Compared with the whole-city rate; a place record means it is mapped, not open or licensed.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer uses the Fair share map to compare cafés in every hex of Munich with the city average, then groups the hexes with the most cafés into the Standouts below. Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Isarvorstadt ranks #1 with cafés at 9.3× the average across 36 hexes (188 cafés for 31,318 residents). Maxvorstadt ranks #2 with cafés at 3.7× the average across 17 hexes (66 cafés for 32,008 residents). 8.2 ranks #3 with cafés at 4.1× the average across 20 hexes (59 cafés for 24,466 residents). Haidhausen ranks #4 with cafés at 4.4× the average across 16 hexes (53 cafés for 21,057 residents). Obergiesing ranks #5 with cafés at 2.6× the average across 13 hexes (32 cafés for 20,799 residents).
Measured as cafés on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where is Munich (München)'s nightlife most varied?
How mixed the kinds of nightlife place are, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Variety map — Overture Maps
Within a 10-minute walk, the most varied mix of nightlife kinds in Munich (München) is around Au (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt): very mixed, with no single nightlife kind above 30%. Sendling and Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) follow, with no single nightlife kind above 23% and 41%.
One hex is too small to show a mix: where any are found, only one kind is there in 70 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a mix has room to show. Counts mapped places of each kind; it says nothing about quality or price.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how mixed the nightlife kinds are in every hex of Munich (München), read within a 10-minute walk, on the Variety map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Au (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #1: very mixed across 43 hexes (Cocktail Bar 30%, Dance Club 22%, Pub 21%). It spans Lehel. Sendling ranks #2: very mixed across 43 hexes (Cocktail Bar 23%, Wine Bar 20%, Dance Club 20%). It spans 8.2. Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #3: very mixed across 43 hexes (Dance Club 41%, Lounge 22%, Cocktail Bar 18%). It spans Maxvorstadt. Schwabing (north-east) (Schwabing-West) ranks #4: very mixed across 42 hexes (Pub 38%, Cocktail Bar 25%, Lounge 25%). It spans Schwabing and Freimann. Schwabing (east) (Schwabing-West) ranks #5: very mixed across 36 hexes (Cocktail Bar 33%, Dance Club 23%, Pub 17%). It spans Schwabing.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as nightlife kinds on the Variety map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
One-person households as a share of all private households on the Amount map — Zensus 2022
One-person households are most common around Maxvorstadt, where 73% of households are one-person (16,619 of 22,763). Freimann (Schwabing-Freimann) follows with 71.2% of households being one-person, and Lochhausen (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) has 70.5% one-person households.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows one-person households in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map. It then groups the hexes with the most one-person households into the Standouts below.
Maxvorstadt ranks #1 among Standouts, with 73% of households being one-person across 43 hexes (16,619 one-person households of 22,763). Freimann (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #2, with 71.2% of households being one-person across 10 hexes (328 one-person households of 460). Lochhausen (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #3, with 70.5% of households being one-person across 5 hexes (41 one-person households of 58). Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #4, with 70% of households being one-person across 26 hexes (6,069 one-person households of 8,664). Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #5, with 67.5% of households being one-person across 25 hexes (3,459 one-person households of 5,125).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as one-person households (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where is the share of residents aged 70 and over far above the Munich (München) average?
Residents aged 70 and over as a share of all residents, against the Munich (München) average on the Fair share map — two published bands, Zensus 2022
Around Perlach, residents aged 70 and over are 1.4× the Munich average, with 19.5% of the population. Pasing and Laim also show 1.4× the average for this age group.
Compared with the whole-city figure; a per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer compares residents aged 70 and over in every hex of Munich with the city average on the Fair share map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Perlach ranks #1, showing 1.4× the average across 35 hexes. Pasing ranks #2, with 1.4× the average across 28 hexes. Laim ranks #3, with 1.4× the average across 28 hexes. Englschalking ranks #4, showing 1.6× the average across 30 hexes. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #5, with 1.5× the average across 27 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as residents aged 70 and over (2022) on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where do Munich (München)'s shops cluster, and is it a real cluster?
Mapped shops of every kind on the Clusters map — Overture Maps
Around Ludwigsvorstadt and Isarvorstadt, shops form a cluster the test confirms as genuinely busy; the pattern is not chance. 340 hexes test as genuinely busy.
A two-sided test with a false-discovery cut; hexes at the edge of the data are not judged.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer tests every hex for shops against chance on the Clusters map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Ludwigsvorstadt ranks #1: genuinely busy across 43 hexes. Isarvorstadt ranks #2: genuinely busy across 43 hexes. 8.2 ranks #3: genuinely busy across 40 hexes. Laim ranks #4: genuinely busy across 34 hexes. Schwabing ranks #5: genuinely busy across 27 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as shops on the Clusters map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Where do people have the most living space in Munich (München)?
Average living space per resident in m² on the Amount map — Zensus 2022
Living space per resident peaks around Harlaching: 71 m², against a Munich (München) figure of 48.1 m². Schwabing and Trudering-Riem follow at 66.2 m² and 64.9 m².
Untergiesing-Harlaching as a whole averages 50.4 m², 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Schwabing-Freimann as a whole averages 47.7 m², 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Trudering-Riem as a whole averages 50.7 m², 1.1× Munich (München)'s figure.
Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied as a whole averages 47.5 m², 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln as a whole averages 50.2 m², 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows living space per resident in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Harlaching ranks #1: 71 m² across 14 hexes. Schwabing ranks #2: 66.2 m² across 34 hexes. Trudering-Riem ranks #3: 64.9 m² across 20 hexes. Lochhausen ranks #4: 62.3 m² across 18 hexes. Solln ranks #5: 62.2 m² across 24 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as living space per resident (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Which Munich (München) neighborhoods are the youngest?
Average age against the Munich (München) average on the Fair share map — Zensus 2022
Around Schwabing, the average age is 0.8× the Munich average of 32.1 years. 8.2 and Riem have average ages that are 0.9× and 0.8× the city average, respectively.
Schwabing-Freimann as a whole averages 40.4 years, 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
8.2 as a whole averages 39.4 years, 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Trudering-Riem as a whole averages 40.5 years, 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Allach-Untermenzing as a whole averages 41.6 years, 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Laim as a whole averages 42.2 years, 1.0× Munich (München)'s figure.
Compared with the whole-city figure; a per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer compares the average age in every hex with the city average on the Fair share map, then groups the hexes with the least into the Standouts below.
Schwabing ranks #1, with an average age 0.8× the city average across 22 hexes. 8.2 ranks #2, with an average age 0.9× the city average across 18 hexes. Riem ranks #3, with an average age 0.8× the city average across 18 hexes. Allach ranks #4, with an average age 0.8× the city average across 14 hexes. Laim ranks #5, with an average age 0.8× the city average across 14 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as average age (2022) on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the least. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where in Munich (München) is rent lower and transit dense?
Net cold rent per m² ranked against transit stop density — a lower-rent, high-transit score
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking Standouts are Harthof (Milbertshofen-Am Hart), Neuperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach), and Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten). Harthof (Milbertshofen-Am Hart) leads with a score of 48.5/100 across 44 hexes, where the data shows average net rent per m²: €10.99 and ≈11 transit stops. Each Standout is a group of high-scoring hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
A shortlist by 2 factors, not a site recommendation.
How this answer was built
Rent scored down against transit stops scored up — the trade-off most people actually make when choosing where to live. Both are published directly, so neither side is a proxy for the other.
Measure
Direction
Importance
Why it’s here
Average net rent per m²
Less is better
55%
Average net cold rent per m², scored inverted so cheaper hexes rank higher.
transit stop count
More is better
45%
Count of mapped public transport stops in the hex.
What this can’t tell you
Rent is the average across the housing stock, not what any particular flat costs or what a new tenant would pay. Stop density is not service frequency, and neither measure says anything about journey times to anywhere specific.
Try changing it
· Add pedestrian street length to weigh walkability alongside transit.
· Flip the rent direction to see the high-rent, high-transit hexes instead.
· Swap rent per m² for the post-1990 large-flat rent to hold the housing type constant.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer ranks every hex in Munich (München) based on Average net rent per m² (less is better, importance 55%) and transit stop count (more is better, importance 45%). The top-scoring hexes are then grouped into the Standouts listed below.
Harthof (Milbertshofen-Am Hart) ranks #1 with a score of 48.5/100 across 44 hexes, showing average net rent per m²: €10.99 and ≈11 transit stops. Neuperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #2 with a score of 46.1/100 across 42 hexes, showing average net rent per m²: €10.93 and ≈6 transit stops. Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #3 with a score of 44.9/100 across 43 hexes, showing average net rent per m²: €11.93 and ≈13 transit stops. Ramersdorf (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #4 with a score of 45.4/100 across 42 hexes, showing average net rent per m²: €10.97 and ≈9 transit stops. The Standout named 8.2 ranks #5 with a score of 44.5/100 across 42 hexes, showing average net rent per m²: €12.74 and ≈20 transit stops.
Each Standout is a group of high-scoring hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Factors: Average net rent per m² (2022) and transit stop count. 2,312 of 2,999 hexes in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where are bank branches missing for the people who live there in Munich (München)?
Mapped bank and credit-union branches within a 10-minute walk against the number Munich (München)'s rate predicts for the residents there, on the Missing map — Overture Maps and Zensus 2022
Within a 10-minute walk of Fasangarten, bank branches fall short of Munich (München)'s rate by about 2 (0 mapped, 3 expected). Zamdorf and Ramersdorf are short by about 1 and 2.
One hex is too small to show a shortfall: at the Munich (München) rate, less than half of one is expected in 82 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a shortfall has room to show. Expected is modeled from the city rate. A zero means nothing mapped, never nothing there.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how many bank branches each hex of Munich (München) is short of at the city's rate, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Missing map. The Standouts below group the hexes with the largest shortfalls.
Fasangarten ranks #1, short by about 2 across 43 hexes (0 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Zamdorf ranks #2, short by about 1 across 42 hexes (0 mapped, 1 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Ramersdorf ranks #3, short by about 2 across 42 hexes (1 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Aubing ranks #4, short by about 3 across 41 hexes (0 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Feldmoching ranks #5, short by about 1 across 41 hexes (0 mapped, 1 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as bank branches on the Missing map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the least. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
One-room apartments as a share of all apartments on the Amount map — Zensus 2022
Milbertshofen-Am Hart shows the highest concentration of one-room apartments, with 32% of its total apartments being one-room units (2,125 of 6,642). Moosach follows with 20.3% and Maxvorstadt with 19.7%, indicating where one-room apartments are most common.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows one-room apartments in every hex on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #1, with 32% of its apartments being one-room units across 24 hexes (2,125 one-room apartments of 6,642 total apartments). Moosach ranks #2, showing 20.3% across 6 hexes (96 one-room apartments of 474 total). Maxvorstadt ranks #3, with 19.7% across 39 hexes (4,110 one-room apartments of 20,903 total). Freimann ranks #4, with 19.3% across 11 hexes (640 one-room apartments of 3,311 total). Harthof ranks #5, with 17.8% across 13 hexes (579 one-room apartments of 3,244 total).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as one-room apartments (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Around 8.2 (south-east) and Isarvorstadt, hotels form a cluster the test confirms as genuinely busy; the pattern is not chance. This answer identifies the top Standouts of genuinely busy hexes for hotels. 156 hexes across Munich (München) test as genuinely busy, indicating significant concentrations of hotels beyond random distribution.
A two-sided test with a false-discovery cut; hexes at the edge of the data are not judged.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer identifies Standouts of hotels across Munich (München) where the concentration of hotels is genuinely busy, meaning the pattern is not due to chance. The Standouts are groups of hexes with the highest scores for hotels.
8.2 (south-east) ranks #1, with 43 hexes confirmed as genuinely busy. Isarvorstadt ranks #2, with 39 hexes confirmed as genuinely busy. 8.2 (south) ranks #3, with 17 hexes confirmed as genuinely busy. Lehel ranks #4, with 14 hexes confirmed as genuinely busy. Schwabing ranks #5, with 10 hexes confirmed as genuinely busy.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as hotels on the Clusters map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Which Munich (München) neighborhoods have more than their fair share of restaurants?
Mapped restaurants per resident against the Munich (München) average on the Fair share map — Overture Maps and Zensus 2022
Isarvorstadt (Altstadt-Lehel) has restaurants at 9.0× the Munich (München) average, with 891 restaurants for 33,317 residents. Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) and Au (Altstadt-Lehel) also show high concentrations, at 2.9× and 3.5× the city average, respectively.
Altstadt-Lehel as a whole has 553 restaurants for 19,003 residents, 10.4× Munich (München)'s rate.
Schwabing-Freimann as a whole has 285 restaurants for 71,507 residents, 1.4× Munich (München)'s rate.
Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt as a whole has 502 restaurants for 45,179 residents, 4.0× Munich (München)'s rate.
Neuhausen-Nymphenburg as a whole has 254 restaurants for 95,887 residents, 0.9× Munich (München)'s rate.
Compared with the whole-city rate; a place record means it is mapped, not open or licensed.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows where restaurants are most concentrated by comparing every hex in Munich (München) to the city average on the Fair share map. The Standouts below group the hexes with the most restaurants.
Isarvorstadt (Altstadt-Lehel) ranks #1, showing 9.0× the average across 43 hexes, with 891 restaurants for 33,317 residents. This Standout spans Maxvorstadt. Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #2, with 2.9× the average across 30 hexes, totaling 388 restaurants for 47,642 residents. Au (Altstadt-Lehel) ranks #3, showing 3.5× the average across 20 hexes, with 266 restaurants for 26,749 residents. Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #4, with 2.9× the average across 23 hexes, providing 233 restaurants for 28,616 residents. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #5, with 2.3× the average across 22 hexes, for 212 restaurants for 32,879 residents.
Each Standout groups hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as restaurants on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where are bakeries missing for the people who live there in Munich (München)?
Mapped bakeries within a 10-minute walk against the number Munich (München)'s rate predicts for the residents there, on the Missing map — Overture Maps and Zensus 2022
Within a 10-minute walk of Ramersdorf (Ramersdorf-Perlach), bakeries are about 1 short of Munich (München)'s rate (2 mapped, 4 expected). Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) and Am Waldfriedhof (Hadern) are short by about 2 and 1.
One hex is too small to show a shortfall: at the Munich (München) rate, less than half of one is expected in 81 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a shortfall has room to show. Expected is modeled from the city rate. A zero means nothing mapped, never nothing there.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how many bakeries each hex of Munich (München) is short of at the city's rate, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Missing map, then groups the hexes with the least into the Standouts below.
Ramersdorf (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #1, short by about 1 across 42 hexes (2 mapped, 4 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Berg am Laim. Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #2, short by about 2 across 41 hexes (3 mapped, 5 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Am Waldfriedhof (Hadern) ranks #3, short by about 1 across 41 hexes (2 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Denning (Bogenhausen) ranks #4, short by about 2 across 40 hexes (0 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Oberföhring. Aubing (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #5, short by about 1 across 39 hexes (2 mapped, 2 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). It spans Pasing.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as bakeries on the Missing map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the least. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
How mixed the kinds of shop are, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Variety map — Overture Maps
Within a 10-minute walk, the most varied mix of shop kinds in Munich (München) is around Lehel (Altstadt-Lehel): very mixed, with no single shop kind above 41%. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) and Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt follow, with no single shop kind above 41% and 39%.
Standout
Neighborhood
How mixed
Top kinds
Map
#1 Lehelalso spans Bogenhausen
Altstadt-Lehel
very mixed
Specialty Store 41%, Fashion And Apparel Store 32%, Food And Beverage Store 23%
One hex is too small to show a mix: where any are found, only one kind is there in 50 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a mix has room to show. Counts mapped places of each kind; it says nothing about quality or price.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how mixed the shop kinds are in every hex of Munich (München), read within a 10-minute walk, on the Variety map. It then groups the hexes with the most variety into the Standouts below.
Lehel (Altstadt-Lehel) ranks #1, showing a very mixed variety across 43 hexes, with Specialty Store at 41%, Fashion And Apparel Store at 32%, and Food And Beverage Store at 23%. This Standout spans Bogenhausen. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #2, also very mixed across 43 hexes, with Fashion And Apparel Store at 41%, Specialty Store at 39%, and Food And Beverage Store at 18%. Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt ranks #3, very mixed across 39 hexes, with Specialty Store at 39%, Fashion And Apparel Store at 32%, and Food And Beverage Store at 24%. This Standout spans Maxvorstadt. Untergiesing-Harlaching ranks #4, very mixed across 36 hexes, with Fashion And Apparel Store at 40%, Specialty Store at 40%, and Food And Beverage Store at 16%. This Standout spans Ludwigsvorstadt. Maxvorstadt ranks #5, very mixed across 34 hexes, with Specialty Store at 48%, Fashion And Apparel Store at 28%, and Food And Beverage Store at 17%.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as shop kinds on the Variety map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Where is the share of foreign nationals far above the Munich (München) average?
Residents without German citizenship against the Munich (München) average on the Fair share map — Zensus 2022 records citizenship only
Around Am Hart, foreign nationals are at 2.0× the Munich average, reaching 54.7% in some hexes. Lerchenau and Perlach also show high concentrations, at 1.5× and 1.6× the average.
Milbertshofen-Am Hart as a whole averages 39%, 1.4× Munich (München)'s figure.
Feldmoching-Hasenbergl as a whole averages 33.7%, 1.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Ramersdorf-Perlach as a whole averages 33.3%, 1.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Obergiesing-Fasangarten as a whole averages 30.2%, 1.1× Munich (München)'s figure.
Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt as a whole averages 25.9%, 0.9× Munich (München)'s figure.
Compared with the whole-city figure; a per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer compares foreign nationals in every hex of Munich with the city average on the Fair share map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Am Hart ranks #1, showing 2.0× the average across 35 hexes. Lerchenau ranks #2, with 1.5× the average across 34 hexes. Perlach ranks #3, with 1.6× the average across 34 hexes. Fasangarten ranks #4, with 1.4× the average across 30 hexes. Ludwigsvorstadt ranks #5, with 1.5× the average across 29 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as foreign nationals (2022) on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows single-family houses in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Fasanerie ranks #1: 66.1% across 18 hexes (278 single-family houses of 421). Lochhausen (west) ranks #2: 65.3% across 10 hexes (39 single-family houses of 60). It spans Lochhausen. Lerchenau ranks #3: 60.6% across 3 hexes (14 single-family houses of 23). Lochhausen (west 2) ranks #4: 58.8% across 7 hexes (172 single-family houses of 293). It spans Lochhausen. Feldmoching ranks #5: 58.6% across 12 hexes (251 single-family houses of 429).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as single-family houses (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Which Munich (München) neighborhoods have far more single-parent households than average?
Single-parent households as a share of all private households against the Munich (München) average on the Fair share map — Zensus 2022
In Ramersdorf, single-parent households are at 1.6× the Munich average, with 9.8% of households here. Freimann shows 1.7× the average, and 8.2 shows 1.5× the average.
Compared with the whole-city figure; a per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer compares single-parent households in every hex with the city average on the Fair share map. The Standouts below group the hexes with the most single-parent households.
Ramersdorf ranks #1, showing 1.6× the average across 18 hexes. Freimann ranks #2, with 1.7× the average across 27 hexes. 8.2 ranks #3, with 1.5× the average across 16 hexes. Neuperlach ranks #4, with 1.5× the average across 26 hexes. Hasenbergl ranks #5, with 1.6× the average across 15 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as single-parent households (2022) on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Apartments with five or more rooms as a share of all apartments on the Amount map — Zensus 2022
Johanneskirchen (Bogenhausen) shows the highest concentration of apartments with five or more rooms, at 75.6% (19 of 25 total apartments). Fasanerie (Feldmoching-Hasenbergl) and Lochhausen (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) also have high concentrations, with 61% and 60.8% respectively.
A per-hex census figure is an estimate for that hex; the source is Zensus 2022.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows apartments with five or more rooms in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map. The hexes with the most apartments with five or more rooms are grouped into the Standouts below.
The Standout in Johanneskirchen (Bogenhausen) ranks #1, with 75.6% of apartments having five or more rooms across 4 hexes (19 of 25 total apartments). Fasanerie (Feldmoching-Hasenbergl) ranks #2, with 61% across 18 hexes (721 of 1,183 total apartments). Lochhausen (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #3, with 60.8% across 7 hexes (165 of 272 total apartments). Langwied (Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied) ranks #4, with 57.4% across 5 hexes (31 of 54 total apartments). Waldperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #5, with 52.1% across 21 hexes (2,142 of 4,114 total apartments).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as apartments with five or more rooms (2022) on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Where are EV charging points densest in Munich (München)?
Mapped EV charging points per km² on the Amount map — Overture Maps
EV charging points are most concentrated around Schwabing (east), with 7.8 per km² (34 EV charging points across 4.4 km²), compared to 1.3 per km² for Munich (München) overall. Lehel and Maxvorstadt show the next highest concentrations, with 6.4 per km² and 6 per km² respectively.
Schwabing-Freimann as a whole has 37 EV charging points across 25 km², 1.5 per km², 1.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Altstadt-Lehel as a whole has 18 EV charging points across 3.3 km², 5.5 per km², 4.2× Munich (München)'s figure.
Maxvorstadt as a whole has 21 EV charging points across 4.2 km², 5 per km², 3.8× Munich (München)'s figure.
Untergiesing-Harlaching as a whole has 15 EV charging points across 8 km², 1.9 per km², 1.5× Munich (München)'s figure.
A place record means it is mapped, not that it is open, licensed or of any size.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows EV charging points in every hex of Munich (München) on the Amount map. It then groups the hexes with the most EV charging points into the Standouts below.
Schwabing (east) ranks #1, showing 7.8 EV charging points per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 34 EV charging points across 4.4 km². This Standout spans Schwabing. Lehel ranks #2, with 6.4 EV charging points per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 28 EV charging points across 4.4 km². This Standout spans Au. Maxvorstadt ranks #3, with 6 EV charging points per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 26 EV charging points across 4.4 km². This Standout spans Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Giesing ranks #4, with 4.1 EV charging points per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 18 EV charging points across 4.4 km². This Standout spans Isarvorstadt. Schwabing (north-east) ranks #5, with 3.7 EV charging points per km² across 43 hexes, totaling 16 EV charging points across 4.4 km². This Standout spans Schwabing.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 meter radius.
Measured as EV charging points on the Amount map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Where is Munich (München)'s cultural scene densest against the city average?
Mapped arts and entertainment places per km² against the Munich (München) average on the Fair share map — Overture Maps
Around Old Town (Altstadt-Lehel), arts and entertainment places run at 15.3× the Munich (München) average (561 arts and entertainment places across 4.3 km²). Berg am Laim and Maxvorstadt sit at 6.8× and 6.4×.
Altstadt-Lehel as a whole has 294 arts and entertainment places across 3.3 km², 90.4 per km², 11.6× Munich (München)'s figure.
Berg am Laim as a whole has 94 arts and entertainment places across 6.4 km², 14.7 per km², 1.9× Munich (München)'s figure.
Maxvorstadt as a whole has 273 arts and entertainment places across 4.2 km², 65.5 per km², 8.4× Munich (München)'s figure.
Neuhausen-Nymphenburg as a whole has 140 arts and entertainment places across 12.9 km², 10.9 per km², 1.4× Munich (München)'s figure.
Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt as a whole has 257 arts and entertainment places across 4.3 km², 60.2 per km², 7.7× Munich (München)'s figure.
Compared with the whole-city rate; a place record means it is mapped, not open or licensed.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer compares arts and entertainment places in every hex of Munich (München) with the city average on the Fair share map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below. Old Town (Altstadt-Lehel) ranks #1, showing 15.3× the average across 42 hexes, with 561 arts and entertainment places across 4.3 km². Berg am Laim ranks #2, showing 6.8× the average across 38 hexes, with 224 arts and entertainment places across 3.9 km². Maxvorstadt ranks #3, showing 6.4× the average across 23 hexes, with 128 arts and entertainment places across 2.3 km². Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #4, showing 3.5× the average across 37 hexes, with 114 arts and entertainment places across 3.8 km². Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #5, showing 5.3× the average across 21 hexes, with 97 arts and entertainment places across 2.1 km². Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as arts and entertainment places on the Fair share map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Where do Munich (München)'s large apartment buildings cluster?
Apartments in buildings of 13 or more units on the Clusters map — Zensus 2022
Around Ludwigsvorstadt and Maxvorstadt, apartments in large buildings form a cluster the test confirms as genuinely busy; the pattern is not chance. This answer identifies 242 hexes across Munich (München) that test as genuinely busy for this measure.
A two-sided test with a false-discovery cut; hexes at the edge of the data are not judged.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer tests every hex of Munich (München) for apartments in large buildings against chance on the Clusters map, then groups the hexes with the most into the Standouts below.
Ludwigsvorstadt ranks #1: genuinely busy across 40 hexes. It spans Haidhausen. Maxvorstadt ranks #2: genuinely busy across 38 hexes. It spans Schwabing. Nymphenburg ranks #3: genuinely busy across 30 hexes. Am Waldfriedhof ranks #4: genuinely busy across 30 hexes. Giesing ranks #5: genuinely busy across 28 hexes.
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as apartments in large buildings (2022) on the Clusters map; the Standouts are the hexes with the most. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Multi-family house (13+ apartments) (count) source
Where are parks missing for the people who live there in Munich (München)?
Mapped parks within a 10-minute walk against the number Munich (München)'s rate predicts for the residents there, on the Missing map — Overture Maps and Zensus 2022
Within a 10-minute walk of Moosach, parks fall short of Munich (München)'s rate by about 1 (0 mapped, 2 expected). Ramersdorf and Milbertshofen-Am Hart are each short by about 1.
One hex is too small to show a shortfall: at the Munich (München) rate, less than half of one is expected in 98 of every 100 hexes. Within a 10-minute walk 19 hexes are read together, so a shortfall has room to show. Expected is modeled from the city rate. A zero means nothing mapped, never nothing there.
Full breakdown & sources
This answer shows how many parks each hex of Munich (München) is short of at the city's rate, read within a 10-minute walk, on the Missing map, then groups the hexes with the least into the Standouts below.
Moosach ranks #1: short by about 1 across 39 hexes (0 mapped, 2 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Ramersdorf ranks #2: short by about 1 across 38 hexes (0 mapped, 1 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #3: short by about 1 across 36 hexes (2 mapped, 3 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Aubing ranks #4: short by about 1 across 33 hexes (0 mapped, 1 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex). Solln ranks #5: short by about 1 across 33 hexes (0 mapped, 1 expected within a 10-minute walk of its top hex).
Each Standout is a group of hexes within a 1,200 m radius.
Measured as parks on the Missing map, read within a 10-minute walk; the Standouts are the hexes with the least. Last computed September 30, 2026.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of May 15, 2022
Every answer reads Munich (München) hex by hex on one of the map types below, then groups the hexes at the end it asks about into Standouts. Sources: Zensus 2022.
Score — Each factor ranks every hex from 0 to 100 against the rest of the city; the Score adds them by importance, and a hex with no data for a factor is scored on the factors it has.
Amount — The Amount map shows one measure in every hex, as a total, per 1 000 residents, per km² or as a share of its category; a Standout pools the hexes inside its circle.
Variety — The Variety map scores how mixed a set of kinds is in each hex, from one kind only to an even mix; a Standout groups the most mixed third.
Fair share — The Fair share map divides each hex's rate by the whole city's rate, so 1× is exactly average; a Standout groups the hexes furthest from it on one side.
Missing — The Missing map applies the whole city's rate to each hex's residents to say how many there would be at that rate, and shows the difference in whole places.
Clusters — The Clusters map tests whether a hex and its neighbors hold more, or less, of a measure than chance would explain, with a correction for testing every hex at once.
Each hex is an H3 resolution 9 hexagon. Each Standout gathers hexes within 1.2 km of its center, and the 5 strongest are kept. Change the size on the map to widen or tighten them.
Hexes are only ranked where the thing being measured could actually exist, so a Less is better factor cannot present empty parkland as an opportunity. Shops, homes and offices need a building; transit stops, EV chargers and bike docks only need a street or path. A hex that already has some of the measure is always ranked.
Dating the numbers
Zensus 2022 is a single-day count published on a 100 m grid; it is not updated between census rounds.
Places, buildings and transportation come from a dated Overture Maps release. A place record means the place is mapped, not that it is licensed, open, or of any particular size.
Zensus 2022 is a single vintage, so nothing here describes growth, decline or any change over time.
How far each answer can be pushed
Each question is labeled with a tier. The tier caps what the answer may claim, whatever the numbers say.
T4 — This is a ranking of hexes, not a measurement of people. The factors it combines are counted in different universes — the data contains no table crossing them — so a high rank means both factors rank high in the same hex, not that they describe the same residents.
Builds MapBees's location-intelligence pipeline end to end — census and Overture Maps ingestion, H3 hex scoring, and the map interface — and writes the methodology behind every number on the site.