Each entry below is one question turned into a map query. It names the fields it weighs and why, shows the areas that come out on top with their real measured values, and states what the data cannot tell you. The link at the end opens that exact query on the Munich (München) map with the weights already set, so you can change a weight, swap a field, or draw your own area and get a different answer.
None of these are the “right” query. They are starting points chosen to show which fields exist for Munich (München) and how combining them changes what you can honestly say.
Which Munich (München) areas have many residents but few bank branches?
Resident counts ranked against mapped bank branches — a coverage gap index
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Au (Au-Haidhausen), Sendling-Westpark, and Milbertshofen-Am Hart. Au (Au-Haidhausen) leads with a score of 85.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈14 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈64,784 residents. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Auin the Au-Haidhausen districtalso spans FasangartenScore 86
Nymphenburg Palacein the Moosach districtalso spans MoosachScore 79
≈9 bank or credit unions nearby
≈33,334 residents
How this query was built
Residents ranked high against mapped bank branches ranked low. It is described as a coverage gap rather than an absence, because the scorer blends percentile ranks: an area can top this index while still having two dozen branches in it.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
bank or credit union competition
lower
50%
Count of mapped bank and credit-union branches, scored inverted so thinner presence ranks higher.
Residents
higher
50%
Published resident count — the demand side of the blend.
What this can’t tell you
It is not residents per branch. Two areas with very different true ratios can rank identically, and a high rank never means there is no branch nearby.
Try changing it
· Raise the branch weight to lean the index toward supply rather than demand.
· Swap residents for the 65+ share to target a specific customer profile.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on bank or credit union competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.5) and residents (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Au (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #1 with a score of 85.8/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈14 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈64,784 residents. Sendling-Westpark ranks #2 with a score of 83.8/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈13 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈54,094 residents. Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #3 with a score of 81.9/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈5 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈44,495 residents. Hadern ranks #4 with a score of 81.4/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈5 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈36,996 residents. Nymphenburg Palace ranks #5 with a score of 79.2/100 across 44 blocks, with ≈9 bank or credit unions nearby and ≈33,334 residents.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: bank or credit union competition and Residents (2022). 2,742 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where does Munich (München) have attractions and transit but few hotels?
Attraction and transit density ranked against mapped hotels — a supply gap index
In Munich (München), Old Town (Altstadt-Lehel), Milbertshofen-Am Hart, and Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) are the highest-ranking areas. Old Town (Altstadt-Lehel) leads with a score of 61/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈25 hotels nearby, ≈167 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈12 transit stops. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Old Townin the Altstadt-Lehel districtalso spans SchwabingScore 61
Arts and entertainment venues plus transit stops on the demand side, mapped hotels inverted on the supply side. A rank blend across venues and network, so it is reported as an index.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
hotel competition
lower
40%
Count of mapped hotels and guest houses, scored inverted so thinner supply ranks higher.
arts and entertainment
higher
35%
Rollup count of mapped arts and entertainment venues — the visitor-demand signal.
transit stop count
higher
25%
Count of mapped transit stops — reachability for arriving guests.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about room counts, occupancy or nightly rates. One mapped hotel is one record whether it has eight rooms or eight hundred.
Try changing it
· Raise the hotel weight to lean harder on thin existing supply.
· Add resident counts if you are targeting domestic rather than visitor demand.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on hotel competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.4), arts and entertainment (higher ranks higher, weight 0.35), and transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.25). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
Old Town (Altstadt-Lehel) ranks #1 with a score of 61/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈25 hotels nearby, ≈167 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈12 transit stops. Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #2 with a score of 55.7/100 across 45 blocks, showing ≈4 hotels nearby, ≈29 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈11 transit stops. Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #3 with a score of 55.8/100 across 44 blocks, showing ≈19 hotels nearby, ≈68 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈10 transit stops. Giesing (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks #4 with a score of 58.2/100 across 42 blocks, showing ≈12 hotels nearby, ≈50 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈12 transit stops. Sendling-Westpark ranks #5 with a score of 54/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈10 hotels nearby, ≈32 arts & entertainment venues nearby, and ≈19 transit stops.
Fields scored: hotel competition, arts and entertainment and transit stop count. 2,720 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Which Munich (München) areas have many EU citizens but few Italian restaurants?
EU citizenship counts ranked against mapped Italian restaurants — a gap index
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Nymphenburg Palace, Pasing, and Sendling-Westpark. Nymphenburg Palace ranks #1 with a score of 80.9/100 across 44 blocks, showing ≈7 Italian restaurants nearby and ≈29,229 residents with EU citizenship. Each area groups high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Nymphenburg Palacein the Moosach districtalso spans MoosachScore 81
≈7 Italian restaurants nearby
≈29,229 residents with EU citizenship
Pasingin the Pasing-Obermenzing districtalso spans HadernScore 82
Ramersdorfin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtalso spans PerlachScore 80
≈4 Italian restaurants nearby
≈29,098 residents with EU citizenship
Englschalkingin the Bogenhausen districtalso spans OberföhringScore 79
≈3 Italian restaurants nearby
≈24,542 residents with EU citizenship
How this query was built
Italian restaurants scored down against a summed count of residents holding German or other EU-27 citizenship scored up. The citizenship group is the union of two classes of one published partition, so summing them is exact rather than estimated.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
italian restaurant competition
lower
50%
Count of mapped Italian restaurants, scored inverted so thin presence ranks higher.
residents with EU citizenship
higher
50%
German and other EU-27 citizenship counts summed — two classes of one published nationality partition.
What this can’t tell you
Citizenship is not taste: nothing here says EU citizens want Italian food, and Italians specifically are not separable — Germany publishes nationality by group, not by country. A thin restaurant count also reflects what is mapped, not what trades.
Try changing it
· Swap the cuisine for any other on the map — the recipe is identical.
· Narrow the citizenship group to other-EU only by dropping the German member.
· Flip the restaurant direction to find the established Italian-dining areas.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis identifies areas in Munich (München) by ranking blocks based on Italian restaurant competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.5) and residents with EU citizenship (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Nymphenburg Palace ranks #1 with a score of 80.9/100 across 44 blocks, featuring ≈7 Italian restaurants nearby and ≈29,229 residents with EU citizenship. Pasing ranks #2 with a score of 81.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈2 Italian restaurants nearby and ≈28,644 residents with EU citizenship. Sendling-Westpark ranks #3 with a score of 80.6/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈7 Italian restaurants nearby and ≈36,681 residents with EU citizenship. Ramersdorf ranks #4 with a score of 80/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈4 Italian restaurants nearby and ≈29,098 residents with EU citizenship. Englschalking ranks #5 with a score of 79.1/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈3 Italian restaurants nearby and ≈24,542 residents with EU citizenship.
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: italian restaurant competition and residents with EU citizenship. 2,749 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Which parts of Munich (München) have the fewest Thai restaurants for their population?
Thai restaurant demand-and-competition index — resident counts and walkable streets against existing Thai presence
In Munich (München), Fasangarten, Schwabing, and Nymphenburg are areas with high scores. Fasangarten leads with 88.4/100 across 43 blocks, featuring ≈0 Thai restaurants nearby, ≈0.15 km of walkable streets, and ≈65,586 residents. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Fasangartenin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans AuScore 88
≈0 Thai restaurants nearby
≈0.15 km of walkable streets
≈65,586 residents
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans Am HartScore 87
≈1 Thai restaurant nearby
≈0.17 km of walkable streets
≈50,024 residents
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans Neuhausen-NymphenburgScore 86
Resident counts and walkable street length on the demand side, mapped restaurants of this cuisine on the supply side, scored inverted. The result ranks areas where demand signals are strong relative to how many of this cuisine are already mapped there.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
thai restaurant competition
lower
45%
Count of mapped Thai restaurants already trading in the area.
pedestrian length m
higher
25%
Metres of walkable street — a proxy for passing footfall.
Residents
higher
30%
Published resident count — the local demand base.
What this can’t tell you
Cuisine tags come from mapped place records, which are incomplete and sometimes coarse — a restaurant serving this cuisine but tagged differently will not be counted. It says nothing about quality, price or whether local demand for this cuisine actually exists.
Try changing it
· Widen the competition term to all eating and drinking venues to see total restaurant density instead.
· Swap the demand pillar for a specific age band or household type.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
The same query, retargeted
Which parts of Munich (München) have the fewest Italian restaurants for their population?
Top areas: Am Hart, Sendling-Westpark and Freiham — ≈13 Italian restaurants nearby.
Same fields and weights, only the category swapped — adjust any of them on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks blocks in Munich (München) based on Thai restaurant presence (lower counts rank higher, weight 0.45), pedestrian street length in meters (higher ranks higher, weight 0.25), and resident count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.3). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Fasangarten ranks #1 with a score of 88.4/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈0 Thai restaurants nearby, ≈0.15 km of walkable streets, and ≈65,586 residents. Schwabing ranks #2 with a score of 86.5/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈1 Thai restaurant nearby, ≈0.17 km of walkable streets, and ≈50,024 residents. Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 85.8/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈1 Thai restaurant nearby, ≈0.16 km of walkable streets, and ≈52,240 residents. Sendling-Westpark ranks #4 with a score of 85.4/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈1 Thai restaurant nearby, ≈0.13 km of walkable streets, and ≈64,472 residents. Berg am Laim ranks #5 with a score of 84.1/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈0 Thai restaurants nearby, ≈0.17 km of walkable streets, and ≈36,986 residents.
Fields scored: thai restaurant competition, pedestrian length m and Residents (2022). 2,735 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where should you open a new yoga studio in Munich (München)?
yoga studio demand-and-competition index — resident counts and walkable streets against existing yoga studio presence
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Schwabing (north-east), Schwabing (north-east 2), and Fasangarten. Schwabing (north-east) leads with a score of 85.9/100 across 43 blocks, featuring ≈1 yoga studio nearby, ≈0.16 km of walkable streets, and ≈9,956 residents aged 30 to 39. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Schwabing (north-east)in the Schwabing-West districtalso spans Schwabing, GernScore 86
Three signals: how many people are around, how walkable the streets are, and how many of this business type are already mapped there. The last is scored inverted, so an area ranks high when demand signals are strong and existing presence is thin.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
yoga studio competition
lower
45%
Count of mapped yoga studios already trading in the area.
pedestrian length m
higher
25%
Metres of walkable street — a proxy for how much passing footfall a frontage can see.
30 to 39
higher
30%
Published resident count — the local demand base.
What this can’t tell you
This is a shortlist, not a site recommendation. It has no rent, no footfall, no unit availability, no licensing and no catchment modelling, and a thin mapped presence is not proof that an area is unserved.
Try changing it
· Raise the competition weight to prioritise areas with the least existing presence.
· Swap the demand pillar for the age band or household type your customers actually fall into.
· Draw your own catchment on the map to score just that area.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
The same query, retargeted
Where should you open a new gym in Munich (München)?
Top areas: Neuhausen-Nymphenburg, Fasangarten and Moosach — ≈5 gyms nearby.
Same fields and weights, only the category swapped — adjust any of them on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich (München) based on three factors: yoga studio competition (lower competition ranks higher, weighted 0.45), pedestrian street length in meters (higher length ranks higher, weighted 0.25), and the number of residents aged 30 to 39 (higher numbers rank higher, weighted 0.3). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas described below.
Schwabing (north-east) ranks #1 with a score of 85.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈1 yoga studio nearby, ≈0.16 km of walkable streets, and ≈9,956 residents aged 30 to 39. Schwabing (north-east 2) ranks #2 with a score of 83.7/100 across 44 blocks, with ≈3 yoga studios nearby, ≈0.17 km of walkable streets, and ≈9,747 residents aged 30 to 39. Fasangarten ranks #3 with a score of 85.5/100 across 43 blocks, featuring ≈3 yoga studios nearby, ≈0.15 km of walkable streets, and ≈12,360 residents aged 30 to 39. Nymphenburg ranks #4 with a score of 85.4/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈1 yoga studio nearby, ≈0.16 km of walkable streets, and ≈9,741 residents aged 30 to 39. Moosach ranks #5 with a score of 83.3/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈0 yoga studios nearby, ≈0.17 km of walkable streets, and ≈4,775 residents aged 30 to 39.
Each identified area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: yoga studio competition, pedestrian length m and 30 to 39 (2022). 2,734 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where are Munich (München)'s rents high but mapped retail thin?
Rent per m2 ranked against retail venue count — a high-rent, low-retail-density index
In Munich (München), areas with high scores include Bogenhausen, Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann), and Solln (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln). Bogenhausen has a score of 78.5/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈27 retail & shopping venues nearby and an average net rent per m2 of €15.3. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Rent per m² ranked high against retail venue count ranked low. This is a rank blend, not a ratio: it finds areas that sit high on one list and low on the other, which is not the same number as retail per resident.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Average net rent per m2(stands in for area price level)
higher
60%
Average net cold rent per m² as the area price signal.
retail competition
lower
40%
Rollup count of mapped retail venues, scored inverted so thinner retail presence ranks higher.
What this can’t tell you
Low mapped retail presence is not proof that an area is unserved — Overture coverage is good in German cities but it is not a trade register, and a shop that is not mapped still exists.
Try changing it
· Narrow the retail term from the rollup to a single category you actually compete with.
· Add resident counts to weigh demand alongside price.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Average net rent per m2 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6) and retail competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.4). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas described below.
Bogenhausen ranks #1 with a score of 78.5/100 across 43 blocks, featuring ≈27 retail & shopping venues nearby and an average net rent per m2 of €15.3. Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #2 with a score of 73.9/100 across 41 blocks, with ≈73 retail & shopping venues nearby and an average net rent per m2 of €16.34. Solln (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln) ranks #3 with a score of 66.4/100 across 42 blocks, showing ≈42 retail & shopping venues nearby and an average net rent per m2 of €14.16. Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln ranks #4 with a score of 67/100 across 41 blocks, with ≈35 retail & shopping venues nearby and an average net rent per m2 of €13.84. Trudering-Riem ranks #5 with a score of 70.9/100 across 38 blocks, with ≈9 retail & shopping venues nearby and an average net rent per m2 of €13.8.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Average net rent per m2 (2022) and retail competition. 2,322 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where is rent per square metre highest in Munich (München)?
Average net cold rent per m² of housing stock — Zensus 2022
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Altstadt-Lehel, Maxvorstadt and Bogenhausen. Altstadt-Lehel leads with a score of 85.4/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows average net rent per m2: €15.76. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Altstadt-Lehelalso spans St. Benno-ViertelScore 85
A single published mean over the dwellings in each area. Reported on its own rather than blended with demographics, so the number on the page is the number in the source table.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Average net rent per m2
higher
100%
Average net cold rent per m², published directly per grid cell.
What this can’t tell you
Rent is a property of apartments, not of people. A high figure means the housing is expensive, not that the residents are well off — rent-regulated tenants, students sharing large flats and subsidised units all sit inside the same average.
Try changing it
· Cross it with residents in their 30s to see where higher-rent housing and that age band overlap.
· Use the rent-by-build-era fields instead to hold apartment age and size constant.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Average net rent per m2, with higher rent resulting in a higher rank (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Altstadt-Lehel ranks #1 with a score of 85.4/100 across 43 blocks, showing an average net rent per m2 of €15.76. Maxvorstadt ranks #2 with a score of 83.4/100 across 43 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €15.75. Bogenhausen ranks #3 with a score of 79.6/100 across 43 blocks, where the average net rent per m2 is €15.53. Obersendling ranks #4 with a score of 71.3/100 across 41 blocks, showing an average net rent per m2 of €14.42. Schwabing-Freimann ranks #5 with a score of 64.9/100 across 43 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €14.13.
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Average net rent per m2 (2022). 2,322 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where is Munich (München)'s housing owner-occupied, roomy and expensive?
Owner-occupancy, living space per resident and rent per m2 ranked together — a housing-stock index (Zensus 2022)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Obermenzing, Oberföhring, and Großhesselohe. Obermenzing leads with a score of 69.9/100 across 45 blocks, showing a 56% owner occupancy rate, average living space per resident of 61 m², and average net rent per m2 of €13.6. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Obermenzingin the Pasing-Obermenzing districtScore 70
56% owner occupancy rate
average living space per resident: 61 m²
average net rent per m2: €13.6
Oberföhringin the Bogenhausen districtalso spans BogenhausenScore 72
47% owner occupancy rate
average living space per resident: 69 m²
average net rent per m2: €15.13
Großhesselohein the Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln districtalso spans ObersendlingScore 70
Denningin the Bogenhausen districtalso spans ZamdorfScore 64
51% owner occupancy rate
average living space per resident: 57 m²
average net rent per m2: €13.79
How this query was built
All three fields are measured on dwellings, so they combine within one universe. The index describes the housing stock: owner-occupied, roomy, and expensive per m².
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Owner occupancy rate
higher
35%
Published share of dwellings occupied by their owner.
Average living space per resident
higher
35%
Published mean dwelling floor space per resident.
Average net rent per m2(stands in for area price level)
higher
30%
Average net cold rent per m² as the area price signal.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about the occupants. Germany publishes no income, and describing this as where high earners live would be an assumption, not a reading.
Try changing it
· Drop owner-occupancy to see space and price alone.
· Swap living space per person for living space per apartment to describe dwellings rather than occupancy.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Owner occupancy rate (higher ranks higher, weight 0.35), Average living space per resident (higher ranks higher, weight 0.35), and Average net rent per m2 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.3). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Obermenzing ranks #1 with a score of 69.9/100 across 45 blocks, featuring a 56% owner occupancy rate, average living space per resident of 61 m², and average net rent per m2 of €13.6. Oberföhring ranks #2 with a score of 71.6/100 across 41 blocks, showing a 47% owner occupancy rate, average living space per resident of 69 m², and average net rent per m2 of €15.13. Großhesselohe ranks #3 with a score of 70/100 across 41 blocks, with a 49% owner occupancy rate, average living space per resident of 60 m², and average net rent per m2 of €14.42. Ramersdorf-Perlach ranks #4 with a score of 69.1/100 across 40 blocks, with a 57% owner occupancy rate, average living space per resident of 60 m², and average net rent per m2 of €13.46. Denning ranks #5 with a score of 64.1/100 across 43 blocks, with a 51% owner occupancy rate, average living space per resident of 57 m², and average net rent per m2 of €13.79.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Owner occupancy rate (2022), Average living space per resident (2022) and Average net rent per m2 (2022). 2,391 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do you get the most living space for the rent in Munich (München)?
Living space per resident against net cold rent per m2 — a space-per-euro index (Zensus 2022)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Obermenzing (west), Allach, and Obermenzing (west 2). Obermenzing (west) leads with a score of 62.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing an average living space per resident of 61 m² and an average net rent per m2 of €13.25. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Obermenzing (west)in the Pasing-Obermenzing districtalso spans Obermenzing, UntermenzingScore 63
Floor space per resident scored up against rent per m² scored down. Both are published means over the same dwellings, so this stays inside one universe and describes the housing stock: roomy relative to what it costs.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Average living space per resident
higher
55%
Published mean dwelling floor space per resident.
Average net rent per m2
lower
45%
Average net cold rent per m², scored inverted so cheaper stock ranks higher.
What this can’t tell you
Neither field describes the people living there, and more space per person is not wealth — low occupancy raises it just as large dwellings do. The rent is an area average across the stock, not a quoted price.
Try changing it
· Drop the rent term to rank on space alone.
· Switch to living space per apartment to describe dwellings rather than occupancy.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on Average living space per resident (higher ranks higher, weight 0.55) and Average net rent per m2 (lower ranks higher, weight 0.45), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Obermenzing (west) ranks #1 with a score of 62.8/100 across 43 blocks, with an average living space per resident of 61 m² and an average net rent per m2 of €13.25. Allach ranks #2 with a score of 62.1/100 across 41 blocks, with an average living space per resident of 54 m² and an average net rent per m2 of €11.94. Obermenzing (west 2) ranks #3 with a score of 56.1/100 across 45 blocks, with an average living space per resident of 54 m² and an average net rent per m2 of €13.2. Trudering-Riem ranks #4 with a score of 58.2/100 across 43 blocks, with an average living space per resident of 55 m² and an average net rent per m2 of €13.37. Bogenhausen ranks #5 with a score of 59.1/100 across 42 blocks, with an average living space per resident of 56 m² and an average net rent per m2 of €12.86.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Average living space per resident (2022) and Average net rent per m2 (2022). 2,434 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do seniors-only households and pharmacies overlap in Munich (München)?
Seniors-only households blended with mapped pharmacies — an overlap index
In Munich, Schwabing (Schwabing-West), Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen), and Neuhausen-Nymphenburg are areas with high scores. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) leads with a score of 76.6/100 across 43 blocks, featuring ≈8,228 households with seniors only and ≈39 pharmacies nearby. These areas represent clusters of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans MaxvorstadtScore 77
≈8,228 households with seniors only
≈39 pharmacies nearby
Haidhausenin the Au-Haidhausen districtalso spans Old TownScore 66
Giesingin the Untergiesing-Harlaching districtalso spans ObergiesingScore 64
≈6,240 households with seniors only
≈19 pharmacies nearby
How this query was built
Seniors-only households is a published cross-tab and the strongest senior signal Germany has; pharmacy count is mapped venue presence. The index ranks areas high on both.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Households with seniors only
higher
70%
Households in which every member is 65 or older — a published cross-tab cell.
pharmacy
higher
30%
Count of mapped pharmacies in the area.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about care needs, mobility or health. Pharmacy presence is not health-service capacity.
Try changing it
· Score pharmacies inverted to find senior-dense areas with thinner pharmacy presence instead.
· Swap seniors-only households for the 65+ share to rank by share rather than household count.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis identifies areas in Munich (München) by ranking blocks based on the presence of households with seniors only (weighted 0.7) and pharmacies nearby (weighted 0.3), then grouping the top-scoring blocks.
Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #1 with a score of 76.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈8,228 households with seniors only and ≈39 pharmacies nearby. Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #2 with a score of 66.4/100 across 45 blocks, with ≈5,644 households with seniors only and ≈44 pharmacies nearby. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 66.1/100 across 44 blocks, featuring ≈6,987 households with seniors only and ≈19 pharmacies nearby. Sendling ranks #4 with a score of 64.6/100 across 42 blocks, with ≈6,578 households with seniors only and ≈15 pharmacies nearby. Giesing (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks #5 with a score of 64.2/100 across 42 blocks, with ≈6,240 households with seniors only and ≈19 pharmacies nearby.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Households with seniors only (2022) and pharmacy. 2,262 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do couples without children at home live in Munich (München)?
Couple households with no resident children — Zensus 2022
In Munich (München), Schwabing-West, Neuhausen-Nymphenburg, and Sendling are areas with high concentrations of couples without children. Schwabing-West has a score of 84.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈6,994 households. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
A published household-by-family-form cell. Note it covers couples who never had children as well as those whose children have moved out — the data does not separate the two.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Couples without children
higher
100%
Couple households with no resident children — a published household-by-family-form cell.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about the age of those couples, so this is not a retirement or empty-nest indicator on its own.
Try changing it
· Add the 65+ share to see which of these areas skew older.
· Compare with couples with children.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich (München) based on the presence of couples without children, with higher ranks indicating a greater presence (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Schwabing-West ranks #1 with a score of 84.8/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈6,994 households (couples without children). Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #2 with a score of 82.8/100 across 44 blocks, containing ≈6,232 households (couples without children). Sendling ranks #3 with a score of 84.4/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈6,503 households (couples without children). Au ranks #4 with a score of 82.2/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈5,369 households (couples without children). Laim ranks #5 with a score of 74.3/100 across 45 blocks, containing ≈4,846 households (couples without children).
Fields scored: Couples without children (2022). 2,249 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where is the share of residents aged 65 and over highest in Munich (München)?
65+ share of residents, derived from the Zensus 2022 age bands
In Munich (München), Obersendling, Hadern, and Untermenzing are among the highest-scoring areas. Obersendling leads with a score of 82.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing 11% senior share 65+. These areas are clusters of high-scoring blocks, each within a 1,200 m radius.
Obersendlingin the Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln districtalso spans SollnScore 82
Untermenzingin the Allach-Untermenzing districtalso spans ObermenzingScore 73
9.3% senior share 65+
Fürstenriedin the Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln districtalso spans Parkstadt SollnScore 75
8.9% senior share 65+
Perlachin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtalso spans Trudering-RiemScore 71
7.9% senior share 65+
How this query was built
A share computed from the published age partition. Because the age bands are exhaustive and mutually exclusive, the share is exact rather than estimated.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Senior share 65+
higher
100%
Share of residents aged 65+, computed from the published exhaustive age partition.
What this can’t tell you
A high share is not a high count — a small population with many older residents ranks alongside a large one. It also says nothing about health or living arrangements.
Try changing it
· Switch to seniors-only households to count households rather than share of people.
· Add pharmacies to compare the age profile against existing health-service presence.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis identifies areas in Munich (München) based on a high senior share 65+, with a weight of 0.9. The top-scoring blocks are grouped into the following areas.
Obersendling ranks #1 with a score of 82.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing 11% senior share 65+. Hadern ranks #2 with a score of 69.9/100 across 46 blocks, showing 7.9% senior share 65%. Untermenzing ranks #3 with a score of 73.4/100 across 43 blocks, showing 9.3% senior share 65%. Fürstenried ranks #4 with a score of 74.9/100 across 41 blocks, showing 8.9% senior share 65%. Perlach ranks #5 with a score of 71/100 across 43 blocks, showing 7.9% senior share 65%.
Fields scored: Senior share 65+ (2022). “Senior share 65+” is computed by this pipeline from published components rather than published directly. 2,485 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Senior share 65+ (share) — derived from published components source
Which neighborhoods in Munich (München) have the lowest average age?
Mean resident age, Zensus 2022
In Munich (München), areas with the highest scores are Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt), Freimann (Schwabing-Freimann), and Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg). Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) leads with a score of 76.7/100 across 42 blocks, where the average age is 38 yrs. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Ludwigsvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans NymphenburgScore 77
average age: 38 yrs
Freimannin the Schwabing-Freimann districtScore 74
average age: 37 yrs
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans LaimScore 70
average age: 39 yrs
Auin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans IsarvorstadtScore 69
average age: 39 yrs
Neuhausenin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans LehelScore 70
average age: 40 yrs
How this query was built
A single published mean per grid cell, scored so that lower values rank higher. One field, one direction, no blending.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Average age
lower
100%
Published mean age of residents; scored inverted so younger areas rank higher.
What this can’t tell you
A mean hides its distribution: an area of families with young children and an area of students can share an average age while having almost no one in common.
Try changing it
· Look at individual age bands instead to see which ages actually drive the average.
· Add the age diversity index to find mixed-age rather than uniformly young areas.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Average age, where lower ages receive higher ranks (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #1 with a score of 76.7/100 across 42 blocks, showing an average age of 38 yrs. Freimann (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #2 with a score of 73.9/100 across 42 blocks, with an average age of 37 yrs. Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) ranks #3 with a score of 70.3/100 across 43 blocks, where the average age is 39 yrs. Au (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #4 with a score of 68.6/100 across 43 blocks, with an average age of 39 yrs. Neuhausen (Schwabing-West) ranks #5 with a score of 69.9/100 across 42 blocks, with an average age of 40 yrs.
Each identified area consists of a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped together within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Average age (2022). 2,503 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do older residents concentrate in Munich (München)?
Widowed residents blended with the 65-and-over share — an older-resident concentration index (Zensus 2022)
In Munich (München), the areas with the highest scores are Solln, Perlach, and Am Waldfriedhof. Solln leads with a score of 72.4/100 across 45 blocks, showing ≈1,465 residents (widowed) and 11% senior share 65+. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Sollnin the Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln districtScore 72
≈1,465 residents (widowed)
11% senior share 65+
Perlachin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtalso spans NeuperlachScore 73
≈2,504 residents (widowed)
8.3% senior share 65+
Am Waldfriedhofin the Sendling-Westpark districtalso spans SendlingScore 66
Two separate readings of the same residents: how many are widowed, and what share are 65 or over. Marital status and age are published as separate marginals, so neither can be crossed with the other — blending them ranks areas where both run high without claiming the same people are in both.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Widowed
higher
50%
Residents recorded as widowed — one class of the published marital-status partition.
Senior share 65+
higher
50%
Share of residents aged 65+, computed from the published exhaustive age partition.
What this can’t tell you
It is not a count of widowed seniors: that cell does not exist in the data. Nor does it say anything about health, income or whether these residents live alone.
Try changing it
· Drop the widowed term to rank on the 65-and-over share alone.
· Switch to seniors-only households to count households instead of people.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Widowed (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5) and Senior share 65+ (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Solln ranks #1 with a score of 72.4/100 across 45 blocks, showing ≈1,465 residents (widowed) and 11% senior share 65+. Perlach ranks #2 with a score of 72.6/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈2,504 residents (widowed) and 8.3% senior share 65+. Am Waldfriedhof ranks #3 with a score of 66.2/100 across 46 blocks, showing ≈2,336 residents (widowed) and 6.9% senior share 65+. Schwabing ranks #4 with a score of 69.7/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈2,532 residents (widowed) and 6.9% senior share 65+. Hadern ranks #5 with a score of 69.5/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈2,003 residents (widowed) and 7.8% senior share 65+.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Widowed (2022) and Senior share 65+ (2022). “Senior share 65+” is computed by this pipeline from published components rather than published directly. 2,487 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Which Munich (München) areas combine the highest rents with the most residents in their 30s?
Rent tier and the 30-39 age band ranked together — an overlap index (Zensus 2022)
In Munich, the highest-ranking areas are Maxvorstadt (east), Ludwigsvorstadt, and Maxvorstadt (south-east). Maxvorstadt (east) leads with a score of 84.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing an average net rent per m2 of €15.65 and approximately 15,643 residents aged 30–39. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Maxvorstadt (east)in the Maxvorstadt districtalso spans Maxvorstadt, SchwabingScore 85
average net rent per m2: €15.65
≈15,643 residents aged 30–39
Ludwigsvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans AuScore 80
average net rent per m2: €14.78
≈13,834 residents aged 30–39
Maxvorstadt (south-east)in the Maxvorstadt districtalso spans Maxvorstadt, NymphenburgScore 73
average net rent per m2: €14.93
≈10,075 residents aged 30–39
Lehelin the Altstadt-Lehel districtalso spans HaidhausenScore 71
average net rent per m2: €14.86
≈8,275 residents aged 30–39
Schwabingin the Schwabing-Freimann districtalso spans Milbertshofen-Am HartScore 63
average net rent per m2: €13.33
≈8,973 residents aged 30–39
How this query was built
Rent per m² and the 30–39 age band are the two strongest signals Germany publishes for this kind of targeting. They are combined as an overlap index, not as a joint claim: rent is measured on dwellings and the age band on people, and Zensus 2022 publishes no table crossing the two.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Average net rent per m2(stands in for area price level)
higher
50%
Zensus 2022 publishes no income for Germany; average net cold rent per m² is the closest published signal for an area's price level.
30 to 39
higher
50%
The literal published 10-year band, not relabelled as a generation.
What this can’t tell you
It cannot tell you that the residents in their thirties are the ones paying the higher rents, or anything at all about their incomes — Zensus 2022 has no income field, and rent describes the housing stock.
Try changing it
· Drop the rent weight to zero to see the age band on its own as a plain count.
· Swap rent per m² for the post-1990 large-apartment rent field to hold build era constant.
· Raise the rent weight to lean the index toward the price signal.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich based on Average net rent per m2 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5) and the number of residents aged 30 to 39 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Maxvorstadt (east) ranks #1 with a score of 84.9/100 across 43 blocks, featuring an average net rent per m2 of €15.65 and approximately 15,643 residents aged 30–39. Ludwigsvorstadt ranks #2 with a score of 79.6/100 across 43 blocks, where the average net rent per m2 is €14.78 and there are approximately 13,834 residents aged 30–39. Maxvorstadt (south-east) ranks #3 with a score of 73/100 across 43 blocks, showing an average net rent per m2 of €14.93 and approximately 10,075 residents aged 30–39. Lehel ranks #4 with a score of 71/100 across 43 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €14.86 and approximately 8,275 residents aged 30–39. Schwabing ranks #5 with a score of 63.1/100 across 44 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €13.33 and approximately 8,973 residents aged 30–39.
Fields scored: Average net rent per m2 (2022) and 30 to 39 (2022). 2,374 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where are seniors-only households concentrated in Munich (München)?
Households where every member is 65 or older — Zensus 2022
In Munich, the areas with the highest scores are Schwabing, Nymphenburg, and Giesing. Schwabing leads with a score of 87.3/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈8,228 households with seniors only. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans MaxvorstadtScore 87
≈8,228 households with seniors only
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans Neuhausen-NymphenburgScore 85
≈6,932 households with seniors only
Giesingin the Untergiesing-Harlaching districtalso spans ObergiesingScore 82
Zensus 2022 crosses household composition with member age directly, so "every member is 65+" is a published cell rather than something inferred by overlaying a senior share onto a household count. That makes this one of the few age-and-household claims in the German data that is a fact rather than an index.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Households with seniors only
higher
100%
A published cross-tab of household by member age: households in which every member is 65 or older.
What this can’t tell you
It says nothing about the health, income or care needs of those households, and it does not distinguish a seniors-only couple from a senior living alone — household size is a separate marginal that cannot be crossed with senior status.
Try changing it
· Add one-person households to see where seniors-only and single-occupancy areas overlap — as an overlap, not as 'seniors living alone'.
· Add pharmacies to weigh existing health-service presence against the same household counts.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich on Households with seniors only (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Schwabing ranks #1 with a score of 87.3/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈8,228 households with seniors only. Nymphenburg ranks #2 with a score of 84.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈6,932 households with seniors only. Giesing ranks #3 with a score of 82.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈6,358 households with seniors only. Sendling ranks #4 with a score of 80.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈6,418 households with seniors only. Laim ranks #5 with a score of 78.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈5,459 households with seniors only.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Households with seniors only (2022). 2,262 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do residents aged 20–29 live in Munich (München)?
The published 20–29 age band, counted on 15 May 2022
In Munich, the highest-ranking areas are Maxvorstadt (east), Giesing, and Maxvorstadt (west). Maxvorstadt (east) leads with a score of 91.5/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈17,083 residents aged 20–29. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Maxvorstadt (east)in the Maxvorstadt districtalso spans Maxvorstadt, SchwabingScore 92
≈17,083 residents aged 20–29
Giesingin the Untergiesing-Harlaching districtalso spans FasangartenScore 87
≈10,447 residents aged 20–29
Maxvorstadt (west)in the Maxvorstadt districtalso spans Maxvorstadt, Neuhausen-NymphenburgScore 83
Isarvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans LudwigsvorstadtScore 79
≈9,872 residents aged 20–29
How this query was built
The literal published 10-year band, used under its own name. Marketing generation labels do not line up with 10-year census bands, so naming the band directly is both more accurate and just as findable.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
20 to 29
higher
100%
The published 10-year age band, used under its own label rather than relabelled as a generation.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about whether these residents are students, employed, or what they earn. And because the band is anchored to the census date, it is not a count of who is 20–29 today.
Try changing it
· Compare with the 30–39 band to see how the two age groups distribute differently.
· Add bars and nightlife venues to see which of these areas also have a venue cluster.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich on the presence of residents aged 20 to 29 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below. Maxvorstadt (east) ranks #1 with a score of 91.5/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈17,083 residents aged 20–29. Giesing ranks #2 with a score of 87/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈10,447 residents aged 20–29. Maxvorstadt (west) ranks #3 with a score of 82.5/100 across 44 blocks, showing ≈10,506 residents aged 20–29. Sendling ranks #4 with a score of 81.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈9,776 residents aged 20–29. Isarvorstadt ranks #5 with a score of 79/100 across 44 blocks, showing ≈9,872 residents aged 20–29. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: 20 to 29 (2022). 2,304 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do residents aged 30–39 live in Munich (München)?
The published 30–39 age band, counted on 15 May 2022
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas for residents aged 30–39 are Giesing, Maxvorstadt, and Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Giesing (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks highest with a score of 88/100 across 44 blocks, showing ≈13,805 residents aged 30–39. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Giesingin the Untergiesing-Harlaching districtalso spans FasangartenScore 88
The literal published band. The pipeline does not map it onto a generation label, because a 10-year census band and a 16-year marketing cohort are not the same set of people.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
30 to 39
higher
100%
The published 10-year age band, used under its own label.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about income, household form or tenure — those are separate tables that cannot be crossed with age at this geography.
Try changing it
· Add rent per m² to build an overlap index of the two signals.
· Compare with couples with children to see where the age band and family households diverge.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on the presence of residents aged 30 to 39 (higher ranks indicate more residents, with a weight of 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Giesing (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks #1 with a score of 88/100 across 44 blocks, containing ≈13,805 residents aged 30–39. Maxvorstadt ranks #2 with a score of 88.9/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈16,876 residents aged 30–39. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 83.4/100 across 44 blocks, containing ≈13,025 residents aged 30–39. Sendling ranks #4 with a score of 84.4/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈12,921 residents aged 30–39. Laim ranks #5 with a score of 78.5/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈9,741 residents aged 30–39.
Fields scored: 30 to 39 (2022). 2,324 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do Munich (München)'s 20-29 year olds live near education venues?
The 20-29 age band blended with mapped education venues — an overlap index
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Maxvorstadt, Isarvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt), and Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg). Maxvorstadt leads with a score of 87.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈17,083 residents aged 20–29 and ≈205 education venues nearby. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Germany publishes no student status, so this is built from the 20–29 age band and the presence of mapped education venues. It is an overlap index, and it is deliberately not titled as a student map.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
20 to 29
higher
70%
The published 20–29 band, used under its own label.
education
higher
30%
Rollup count of mapped education venues of every kind.
What this can’t tell you
It cannot identify students. Education venues include schools and driving schools as well as universities, and most people aged 20–29 are not students.
Try changing it
· Drop the education term to see the 20–29 band on its own.
· Add bars and nightlife venues instead for a different overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on residents aged 20 to 29 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.7) and education venues (higher ranks higher, weight 0.3). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
Maxvorstadt ranks #1 with a score of 87.9/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈17,083 residents aged 20–29 and ≈205 education venues nearby. Isarvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #2 with a score of 80.6/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈10,898 residents aged 20–29 and ≈210 education venues nearby. Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) ranks #3 with a score of 79.4/100 across 43 blocks, containing ≈10,677 residents aged 20–29 and ≈145 education venues nearby. Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #4 with a score of 74.6/100 across 42 blocks, containing ≈9,081 residents aged 20–29 and ≈164 education venues nearby. Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #5 with a score of 67.5/100 across 45 blocks, containing ≈8,672 residents aged 20–29 and ≈89 education venues nearby.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: 20 to 29 (2022) and education. 2,304 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do family households and parks overlap in Munich (München)?
Couple-with-children households blended with mapped parks — an overlap index
In Munich (München), the areas with the highest scores are Am Waldfriedhof, Fasangarten, and Maxvorstadt. Am Waldfriedhof leads with a score of 60/100 across 46 blocks, showing ≈5,292 households (couples with children) and ≈18 parks nearby. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Am Waldfriedhofin the Sendling-Westpark districtalso spans SendlingScore 60
≈5,292 households (couples with children)
≈18 parks nearby
Fasangartenin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans Old TownScore 62
A published family-household count weighed against mapped parks and active-life venues. Titled as an overlap index because household form and venue presence are counted in different universes.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Couples with children
higher
65%
Couple households with resident children — a published household-by-family-form cell.
park
higher
35%
Count of mapped parks — the most legible family amenity in the venue data.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about school quality, childcare availability or safety — none of which is in either source.
Try changing it
· Drop the park term to see family households as a plain count.
· Swap parks for the wider active-life rollup to include sports and recreation venues.
· Swap couples with children for single-parent households.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich (München) based on the presence of Couples with children (higher ranks higher, weight 0.65) and parks (higher ranks higher, weight 0.35). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Am Waldfriedhof ranks #1 with a score of 60/100 across 46 blocks, showing ≈5,292 households (couples with children) and ≈18 parks nearby. Fasangarten ranks #2 with a score of 61.5/100 across 42 blocks, showing ≈4,924 households (couples with children) and ≈17 parks nearby. Maxvorstadt ranks #3 with a score of 59.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈5,288 households (couples with children) and ≈14 parks nearby. Nymphenburg ranks #4 with a score of 58.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈4,918 households (couples with children) and ≈11 parks nearby. Hadern ranks #5 with a score of 51.7/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈3,963 households (couples with children) and ≈9 parks nearby.
Fields scored: Couples with children (2022) and park. 2,263 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do Munich (München)'s largest households have the least space?
Households of six or more against living space per resident — a household crowding index (Zensus 2022)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten), Thalkirchen (Sendling-Westpark) and Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) leads with a score of 72.2/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈471 households (6 or more persons) and average living space per resident: 43 m². Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Obergiesingin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans GiesingScore 72
≈471 households (6 or more persons)
average living space per resident: 43 m²
Thalkirchenin the Sendling-Westpark districtalso spans Sendling-WestparkScore 74
Large households scored up against floor space per resident scored down. Either alone is ambiguous — a big household in a big home is not crowded — so pairing them is what makes the question mean anything.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
6 or more persons
higher
55%
Households of six or more — the top class of the published household-size partition.
Average living space per resident
lower
45%
Published mean floor space per resident, scored inverted so tighter housing ranks higher.
What this can’t tell you
Household size is counted on households and floor space on dwellings, with no published table crossing them, so this does not establish that the large households are the ones in the smaller homes. It is not a measure of overcrowding as any housing authority defines it.
Try changing it
· Drop the space term to rank on large households alone.
· Swap in apartments by room count to describe the stock instead.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on 6 or more persons (higher ranks higher, weight 0.55) and Average living space per resident (lower ranks higher, weight 0.45), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #1 with a score of 72.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈471 households (6 or more persons) and average living space per resident: 43 m². Thalkirchen (Sendling-Westpark) ranks #2 with a score of 74.4/100 across 41 blocks, showing ≈553 households (6 or more persons) and average living space per resident: 45 m². Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 67/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈453 households (6 or more persons) and average living space per resident: 47 m². Ramersdorf (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #4 with a score of 66.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈407 households (6 or more persons) and average living space per resident: 45 m². Maxvorstadt ranks #5 with a score of 66/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈520 households (6 or more persons) and average living space per resident: 49 m².
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: 6 or more persons (2022) and Average living space per resident (2022). 1,838 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do married couples with children under 18 live in Munich (München)?
Family type crossed with child age — Zensus 2022
In Munich (München), areas with the highest concentration of married couples with at least 1 child under 18 are Schwabing, Nymphenburg, and Sendling. Schwabing leads with a score of 80.4/100 across 43 blocks, showing approximately 3,679 families. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
≈2,741 families (married couple with at least 1 child under 18)
How this query was built
Zensus 2022's family table crosses partnership form with the presence and age of children, so "married couple with at least one child under 18" is a single published cell. That is a much stronger basis for a family-targeting question than combining a household count with a schools proxy.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Married couple with at least 1 child under 18
higher
100%
Married couples with at least one resident child under 18 — a published cross-tab cell.
What this can’t tell you
It counts families, not households or people, and it says nothing about how many children each family has or about family income.
Try changing it
· Compare with unmarried cohabiting couples with children to see how the two family forms distribute differently.
· Add park or active-life venues to weigh family counts against nearby amenities.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich (München) based on the presence of married couples with at least 1 child under 18, with a weighting of 0.9 for higher scores. The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Schwabing ranks #1 with a score of 80.4/100 across 43 blocks, containing approximately 3,679 families. Nymphenburg ranks #2 with a score of 77.5/100 across 44 blocks, showing approximately 3,446 families. Sendling ranks #3 with a score of 77.8/100 across 43 blocks, with approximately 3,625 families. Au ranks #4 with a score of 76.4/100 across 43 blocks, showing approximately 3,373 families. Laim ranks #5 with a score of 70.9/100 across 43 blocks, with approximately 2,741 families.
Each identified area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped together within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Married couple with at least 1 child under 18 (2022). 2,176 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Married couple with at least 1 child under 18 (count) source
Which Munich (München) areas combine higher rents with the most family households?
Rent tier and couple-with-children households ranked together — an overlap index (Zensus 2022)
In Munich, the highest-ranking areas are Schwabing, Isarvorstadt, and Lehel. Schwabing leads with a score of 79.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈4,741 households (couples with children) and average net rent per m2: €15.68. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans MaxvorstadtScore 79
≈4,741 households (couples with children)
average net rent per m2: €15.68
Isarvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans AuScore 72
≈4,426 households (couples with children)
average net rent per m2: €14.72
Lehelin the Altstadt-Lehel districtalso spans HaidhausenScore 67
Couples with children is a published household cell, and rent per m² is a published dwelling mean. Combining them ranks areas where both are high; it does not tell you what those families pay.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Average net rent per m2(stands in for area price level)
higher
45%
Average net cold rent per m² as the area price signal; Germany publishes no income.
Couples with children
higher
55%
Couple households with resident children — a published household-by-family-form cell.
What this can’t tell you
Rent is measured on dwellings and family form on households, with no published table crossing them. Nothing here describes family income.
Try changing it
· Drop rent to see family households on their own as a plain count.
· Swap in single-parent households to compare the two family forms against the same price signal.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich based on Average net rent per m2 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.45) and Couples with children (higher ranks higher, weight 0.55). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
Schwabing ranks #1 with a score of 79.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈4,741 households (couples with children) and average net rent per m2: €15.68. Isarvorstadt ranks #2 with a score of 72/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈4,426 households (couples with children) and average net rent per m2: €14.72. Lehel ranks #3 with a score of 66.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈3,542 households (couples with children) and average net rent per m2: €14.86. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #4 with a score of 64.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈4,918 households (couples with children) and average net rent per m2: €12.83. Sendling ranks #5 with a score of 62.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈5,083 households (couples with children) and average net rent per m2: €12.71.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Average net rent per m2 (2022) and Couples with children (2022). 2,263 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do people living alone have the most places to eat nearby in Munich (München)?
One-person households blended with mapped eating and drinking venues — a solo-living amenity index
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Maxvorstadt, Isarvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) and Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Maxvorstadt leads with a score of 88.4/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈34,193 households (1 person) and ≈295 eat & drink venues nearby. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
One-person households scored up alongside eating-and-drinking venue count. People living alone eat out more, so the pairing finds areas where that household form and the amenities that serve it coincide.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
1 person
higher
65%
One-person households — one class of the published household-size partition.
eat and drink
higher
35%
Rollup count of mapped eating and drinking venues.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about who lives alone — household size is a separate marginal from age and from senior status, so neither "young people living alone" nor "seniors living alone" is available. Venue count is presence, not capacity or trade.
Try changing it
· Drop the venue term to rank on one-person households alone.
· Add seniors-only households to see where the two overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on 1 person (higher ranks higher, weight 0.65) and eat and drink (higher ranks higher, weight 0.35), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Maxvorstadt ranks #1 with a score of 88.4/100 across 43 blocks: ≈34,193 households (1 person) and ≈295 eat & drink venues nearby. It spans Schwabing. Isarvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #2 with a score of 85.3/100 across 43 blocks: ≈24,639 households (1 person) and ≈409 eat & drink venues nearby. It spans Obergiesing. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 78.2/100 across 43 blocks: ≈22,925 households (1 person) and ≈179 eat & drink venues nearby. It spans Maxvorstadt. Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #4 with a score of 76.4/100 across 44 blocks: ≈19,116 households (1 person) and ≈211 eat & drink venues nearby. It spans Berg am Laim. 8.2 ranks #5 with a score of 77.5/100 across 42 blocks: ≈18,398 households (1 person) and ≈187 eat & drink venues nearby. It spans Sendling.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: 1 person (2022) and eat and drink. 2,327 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do single-parent households cluster in Munich (München)?
Single-parent households as counted by Zensus 2022
In Munich, the highest-ranking areas are Schwabing, Fasangarten, and Nymphenburg. Schwabing leads with a score of 86.1/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈2,382 households (single parent). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans Schwabing-WestScore 86
≈2,382 households (single parent)
Fasangartenin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans GiesingScore 82
≈2,086 households (single parent)
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans Neuhausen-NymphenburgScore 77
Ramersdorfin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtalso spans HaidhausenScore 79
≈2,204 households (single parent)
How this query was built
Single-parent status is a published household-by-family-form cell, so this is a direct count. The recipe deliberately uses that field alone — adding a schools or childcare term would turn a fact into a cross-universe index without making the answer any more useful.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Single parent
higher
100%
A published household-by-family-form cell: one adult living with their child or children.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about the income, working hours or support networks of those households, and nothing about the age of the children beyond what the family-type tables publish.
Try changing it
· Add education venues to see which of these areas already have childcare and schooling nearby.
· Swap in couples with children to compare the two household forms side by side.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich on Single parent (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Schwabing ranks #1 with a score of 86.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈2,382 households (single parent). Fasangarten ranks #2 with a score of 81.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈2,086 households (single parent). Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 76.9/100 across 45 blocks, showing ≈2,012 households (single parent). Sendling ranks #4 with a score of 77.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈1,942 households (single parent). Ramersdorf ranks #5 with a score of 79.4/100 across 41 blocks, showing ≈2,204 households (single parent).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Single parent (2022). 2,115 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do unmarried cohabiting couples live in Munich (München)?
Households formed by an unmarried couple — Zensus 2022
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Schwabing-West, Au (Au-Haidhausen) and Sendling. Schwabing-West leads with a score of 87.5/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈3,716 households (unmarried couples). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Household-by-lifestyle publishes unmarried cohabiting couples as its own cell, so this is a direct count rather than an inference from marital status (which is a separate marginal over individuals and cannot be crossed with household form).
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Unmarried couples
higher
100%
A published household-by-lifestyle cell: couples living together without being married or in a civil partnership.
What this can’t tell you
It cannot tell you the ages of those couples, whether they have children, or how long they have lived together.
Try changing it
· Compare against married-couple households in the same view.
· Add residents in their 30s as a second weight to see where the two overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on Unmarried couples (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Schwabing-West ranks #1 with a score of 87.5/100 across 43 blocks: ≈3,716 households (unmarried couples). Au (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #2 with a score of 88.2/100 across 42 blocks: ≈3,323 households (unmarried couples). Sendling ranks #3 with a score of 85.1/100 across 43 blocks: ≈3,026 households (unmarried couples). Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #4 with a score of 76.7/100 across 43 blocks: ≈2,338 households (unmarried couples). Laim ranks #5 with a score of 74.2/100 across 43 blocks: ≈1,992 households (unmarried couples).
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Unmarried couples (2022). 2,139 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do married residents cluster in Munich (München)?
Marital status, Zensus 2022
In Munich, the areas with the highest scores for Married residents are Schwabing, Nymphenburg, and Sendling. Schwabing leads with a score of 84.5/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈21,769 residents (married). Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans Schwabing-WestScore 85
≈21,769 residents (married)
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans Neuhausen-NymphenburgScore 83
One class of the published marital-status partition, counted directly.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Married
higher
100%
Residents recorded as married — one class of the published marital-status partition.
What this can’t tell you
It counts individuals, not couples or households, and it cannot be crossed with age, nationality or income.
Try changing it
· Switch to married-couple households for a household-level count.
· Compare with unmarried cohabiting couples.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich based on Married residents (higher ranks higher, with a weight of 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas listed below.
Schwabing ranks #1 with a score of 84.5/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈21,769 residents (married). Nymphenburg ranks #2 with a score of 83/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈20,057 residents (married). Sendling ranks #3 with a score of 82/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈20,948 residents (married). Au ranks #4 with a score of 81.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈18,751 residents (married). Hadern ranks #5 with a score of 75.7/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈15,685 residents (married).
Fields scored: Married (2022). 2,442 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where is dense apartment housing cheapest per square metre in Munich (München)?
Apartments in blocks of 13+ units against net cold rent per m2 — an affordable-density index (Zensus 2022)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Obergiesing, Neuperlach, and Am Waldfriedhof. Obergiesing leads with a score of 71.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈18,108 apartments in multi-family houses (13+ apartments) and an average net rent per m2 of €12.1. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Obergiesingin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans FasangartenScore 72
≈18,108 apartments — multi-family house (13+ apartments)
average net rent per m2: €12.1
Neuperlachin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtScore 71
≈13,158 apartments — multi-family house (13+ apartments)
average net rent per m2: €11.08
Am Waldfriedhofin the Sendling-Westpark districtalso spans SendlingScore 70
≈19,811 apartments — multi-family house (13+ apartments)
≈12,411 apartments — multi-family house (13+ apartments)
average net rent per m2: €12.71
How this query was built
Dwellings in large blocks scored up against rent per m² scored down. Both describe the same housing stock, so the index reads as one thing: dense housing that is not expensive per square metre.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Multi-family house (13+ apartments)
higher
55%
Dwellings in buildings with 13 or more units — a published building-type class.
Average net rent per m2
lower
45%
Average net cold rent per m², scored inverted so cheaper stock ranks higher.
What this can’t tell you
"13 or more units" is building size, not height — a Gründerzeit block and a Plattenbau slab both qualify and neither is a tower. Nothing here describes condition, tenure or who lives there.
Try changing it
· Drop the rent term to rank on large blocks alone.
· Flip the rent direction to find the expensive dense stock instead.
· Swap in one- and two-family houses for the opposite end of the market.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich (München) based on the presence of multi-family houses (13+ apartments), weighted at 0.55, and average net rent per m2, weighted at 0.45 (lower rent ranks higher). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Obergiesing ranks #1 with a score of 71.9/100 across 43 blocks, featuring ≈18,108 apartments in multi-family houses (13+ apartments) and an average net rent per m2 of €12.1. Neuperlach ranks #2 with a score of 71/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈13,158 apartments in multi-family houses (13+ apartments) and an average net rent per m2 of €11.08. Am Waldfriedhof ranks #3 with a score of 70.3/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈19,811 apartments in multi-family houses (13+ apartments) and an average net rent per m2 of €12.42.
Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #4 with a score of 66.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈22,321 apartments in multi-family houses (13+ apartments) and an average net rent per m2 of €12.88. Laim ranks #5 with a score of 63.8/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈12,411 apartments in multi-family houses (13+ apartments) and an average net rent per m2 of €12.71.
Fields scored: Multi-family house (13+ apartments) (2022) and Average net rent per m2 (2022). 1,719 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Multi-family house (13+ apartments) (count) source
Where is housing vacancy highest in Munich (München)?
Share of dwellings recorded as vacant — Zensus 2022
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Obermenzing (Pasing-Obermenzing), Hadern, and Forstenried (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln). Obermenzing (Pasing-Obermenzing) leads with a score of 76/100 across 41 blocks, showing a 17% vacancy rate. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Obermenzingin the Pasing-Obermenzing districtalso spans UntermenzingScore 76
Oberföhringin the Bogenhausen districtalso spans BogenhausenScore 59
11% vacancy rate
How this query was built
A published rate over dwellings, reported on its own.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Vacancy rate
higher
100%
Published share of dwellings recorded as vacant on the census reference date.
What this can’t tell you
A vacant dwelling on census day may be between tenants, under renovation, or held off the market — the rate does not distinguish them, and it is a snapshot of one day in May 2022.
Try changing it
· Switch to the market-active vacancy rate to exclude dwellings not offered for letting.
· Add rent per m² to see how vacancy and price relate.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Vacancy rate (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Obermenzing (Pasing-Obermenzing) ranks #1 with a score of 76/100 across 41 blocks, showing a 17% vacancy rate. Hadern ranks #2 with a score of 68.2/100 across 40 blocks, showing a 14% vacancy rate. Forstenried (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln) ranks #3 with a score of 62/100 across 41 blocks, showing an 11% vacancy rate. Trudering-Riem ranks #4 with a score of 69.7/100 across 34 blocks, showing a 16% vacancy rate. Oberföhring (Bogenhausen) ranks #5 with a score of 59.1/100 across 39 blocks, showing an 11% vacancy rate.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Vacancy rate (2022). 1,659 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where is owner-occupancy highest in Munich (München)?
Share of dwellings occupied by their owner — Zensus 2022
In Munich, the highest-ranking areas are Moosach, Allach, and Trudering-Riem. Moosach leads with a score of 73.7/100 across 43 blocks, showing a 59% owner occupancy rate. Allach follows with 68.2/100 across 42 blocks, and Trudering-Riem scores 65.9/100 across 43 blocks. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Lochhausenin the Aubing-Lochhausen-Langwied districtScore 81
67% owner occupancy rate
Lerchenauin the Feldmoching-Hasenbergl districtalso spans FeldmochingScore 66
54% owner occupancy rate
How this query was built
Owner-occupancy is the field Zensus 2022 actually publishes. Berlin has no renter-share field, so a "where renters live" page would have to invert this one — which quietly assumes owners and renters account for every dwelling and ignores vacant and otherwise-occupied units. This page reports the measured field instead.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Owner occupancy rate
higher
100%
Published share of dwellings occupied by their owner — the tenure field Zensus 2022 actually carries.
What this can’t tell you
It measures dwellings, not people, and its complement is not the renter share.
Try changing it
· Score this field inverted to rank the lowest owner-occupancy areas — the closest honest view of rental concentration.
· Add vacancy rate to see the rest of the tenure picture.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich on Owner occupancy rate (higher ranks higher, weight 0.9), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Moosach ranks #1 with a score of 73.7/100 across 43 blocks, showing a 59% owner occupancy rate. Allach ranks #2 with a score of 68.2/100 across 42 blocks, showing a 55% owner occupancy rate. Trudering-Riem ranks #3 with a score of 65.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing a 53% owner occupancy rate. Lochhausen ranks #4 with a score of 81.4/100 across 34 blocks, showing a 67% owner occupancy rate. Lerchenau ranks #5 with a score of 66/100 across 41 blocks, showing a 54% owner occupancy rate.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Owner occupancy rate (2022). 2,268 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where are rents highest for Munich (München)'s post-1990 apartments over 65 m²?
Net cold rent per m², crossed with build era and dwelling size — Zensus 2022
In Munich (München), Schwabing (Schwabing-West), Isarvorstadt (Altstadt-Lehel), and Bogenhausen are the highest-ranking areas. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) leads with a score of 83.3/100 across 41 blocks, where the data shows post-1990 rent /m²: €18.72. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Forstenriedin the Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln districtalso spans SollnScore 67
post-1990 rent /m²: €15.71
Obermenzingin the Pasing-Obermenzing districtScore 64
post-1990 rent /m²: €15.27
How this query was built
This is the strongest price page Germany can run, because rent is published crossed with build era and dwelling size rather than as a single blended mean. Holding era and size fixed removes most of the composition effect that makes a bare rent average hard to read.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Built after 1990 / Over 65 m2
higher
100%
Average net cold rent per m² for dwellings built after 1990 and larger than 65 m² — a published cross-tab.
What this can’t tell you
It describes what these apartments cost, not what their occupants earn. Berlin's rent regime also means long-tenure households in expensive areas often pay old rents, so this is not a ranking of household budgets.
Try changing it
· Switch to the pre-1990 large-apartment rent field to compare build eras in the same places.
· Switch to the post-1990 small-apartment field to hold era fixed and vary size instead.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Built after 1990 / Over 65 m2, with higher ranks indicating higher scores (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #1 with a score of 83.3/100 across 41 blocks, showing post-1990 rent /m²: €18.72. Isarvorstadt (Altstadt-Lehel) ranks #2 with a score of 75.5/100 across 43 blocks, with post-1990 rent /m²: €17.38. Bogenhausen ranks #3 with a score of 74.5/100 across 41 blocks, with post-1990 rent /m²: €17.29. Forstenried (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln) ranks #4 with a score of 66.7/100 across 43 blocks, with post-1990 rent /m²: €15.71. Obermenzing (Pasing-Obermenzing) ranks #5 with a score of 63.7/100 across 43 blocks, with post-1990 rent /m²: €15.27.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Built after 1990 / Over 65 m2 (2022). 1,996 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where in Munich (München) is rent lower and transit dense?
Net cold rent per m2 ranked against transit stop density — a lower-rent, high-transit index
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Harthof, Neuperlach, and Obergiesing. Harthof leads with a score of 48.5/100 across 44 blocks, showing an average net rent per m2 of €10.99 and ≈11 transit stops. These areas are clusters of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Harthofin the Milbertshofen-Am Hart districtalso spans FeldmochingScore 49
average net rent per m2: €10.99
≈11 transit stops
Neuperlachin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtScore 46
average net rent per m2: €10.93
≈6 transit stops
Obergiesingin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans FasangartenScore 45
average net rent per m2: €11.93
≈13 transit stops
Ramersdorfin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtalso spans Berg am LaimScore 45
Rent scored down against transit stops scored up — the trade-off most people actually make when choosing where to live. Both are published directly, so neither side is a proxy for the other.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Average net rent per m2
lower
55%
Average net cold rent per m², scored inverted so cheaper areas rank higher.
transit stop count
higher
45%
Count of mapped public transport stops in the area.
What this can’t tell you
Rent is the average across an area's housing stock, not what any particular flat costs or what a new tenant would pay. Stop density is not service frequency, and neither field says anything about journey times to anywhere specific.
Try changing it
· Add pedestrian street length to weigh walkability alongside transit.
· Flip the rent direction to see the high-rent, high-transit areas instead.
· Swap rent per m² for the post-1990 large-flat rent to hold the housing type constant.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on Average net rent per m2 (lower ranks higher, weight 0.55) and transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.45). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas below.
Harthof ranks #1 with a score of 48.5/100 across 44 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €10.99 and ≈11 transit stops. Neuperlach ranks #2 with a score of 46.1/100 across 42 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €10.93 and ≈6 transit stops. Obergiesing ranks #3 with a score of 44.9/100 across 43 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €11.93 and ≈13 transit stops. Ramersdorf ranks #4 with a score of 45.4/100 across 42 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €10.97 and ≈9 transit stops. 8.2 ranks #5 with a score of 44.5/100 across 42 blocks, with an average net rent per m2 of €12.74 and ≈20 transit stops.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Average net rent per m2 (2022) and transit stop count. 2,322 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Which Munich (München) areas combine a high foreign-national share with higher rents?
Citizenship mix and rent tier ranked together — an overlap index (Zensus 2022)
When exploring Munich (München), Maxvorstadt, Milbertshofen-Am Hart, and Bogenhausen are the highest-ranking areas. Maxvorstadt leads with a score of 74.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing 37% foreign nationals share and an average net rent per m2 of €15.7. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Foreign-national share is a published resident share; rent per m² is a published dwelling mean. The index ranks areas high on both. Germany has no occupation or income field, so no version of this question can describe what those residents do for a living.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Foreign nationals share
higher
55%
Published share of residents without German citizenship.
Average net rent per m2(stands in for area price level)
higher
45%
Average net cold rent per m² as the area price signal.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about profession, qualification, employer or income, and nothing about which residents occupy which dwellings.
Try changing it
· Drop rent to see the foreign-national share on its own.
· Swap in a single nationality group for a more specific view.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
The areas are ranked based on a combination of Foreign nationals share (weighted 0.55) and Average net rent per m2 (weighted 0.45). Maxvorstadt ranks #1 with a score of 74.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing 37% foreign nationals share and an average net rent per m2 of €15.7. Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #2 with a score of 68.5/100 across 40 blocks, showing 39% foreign nationals share and an average net rent per m2 of €13.76. Bogenhausen ranks #3 with a score of 62.2/100 across 43 blocks, showing 32% foreign nationals share and an average net rent per m2 of €14.42.
Old Town ranks #4 with a score of 60.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing 25% foreign nationals share and an average net rent per m2 of €16.13. Sendling-Westpark ranks #5 with a score of 58.1/100 across 44 blocks, showing 32% foreign nationals share and an average net rent per m2 of €13.33. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Foreign nationals share (2022) and Average net rent per m2 (2022). 2,366 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Which neighborhoods have the highest nationality diversity in Munich (München)?
Diversity index over the Zensus 2022 nationality-group partition
In Munich (München), areas with the highest Nationality diversity index include Neuperlach, Ramersdorf, and Milbertshofen-Am Hart. Neuperlach leads with a score of 82.4/100 across 43 blocks, showing a Nationality diversity index of 0.4. These areas represent clusters of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Neuperlachin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtScore 82
Nationality diversity index: 0.4
Ramersdorfin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtalso spans Berg am LaimScore 80
A diversity index computed over the published nationality-group partition. Germany records citizenship, so this measures how mixed an area's citizenships are — it is explicitly not an ethnicity measure, because Zensus 2022 does not collect ethnicity.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Nationality diversity index
higher
100%
Diversity index over the published, exhaustive nationality-group partition.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about ethnicity, ancestry, language or how long residents have lived in Germany. Dual nationals are counted under a separate published class.
Try changing it
· Switch to a single nationality group to see where one citizenship concentrates.
· Compare with the foreign-national share, which measures level rather than mix.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks blocks in Munich (München) based on their Nationality diversity index, with higher values indicating a higher rank (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Neuperlach ranks #1 with a score of 82.4/100 across 43 blocks, showing a Nationality diversity index of 0.4. Ramersdorf ranks #2 with a score of 80.4/100 across 43 blocks, with a Nationality diversity index of 0.39. Milbertshofen-Am Hart ranks #3 with a score of 76.1/100 across 43 blocks, with a Nationality diversity index of 0.39. Hasenbergl ranks #4 with a score of 76.5/100 across 42 blocks, with a Nationality diversity index of 0.39. Laim ranks #5 with a score of 72.6/100 across 42 blocks, with a Nationality diversity index of 0.38.
Each identified area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped together within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Nationality diversity index (2022). “Nationality diversity index” is computed by this pipeline from published components rather than published directly. 2,494 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Nationality diversity index (index) — derived from published components source
Where do international residents and retail activity overlap in Munich (München)?
Share of residents without German citizenship blended with mapped retail — an overlap index
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt), Freimann (Schwabing-Freimann) and Laim. Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) leads with a score of 74.8/100 across 44 blocks, where the data shows 36% foreign nationals share and ≈735 retail & shopping venues nearby. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Ludwigsvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans MaxvorstadtScore 75
36% foreign nationals share
≈735 retail & shopping venues nearby
Freimannin the Schwabing-Freimann districtalso spans SchwabingScore 68
The published foreign-national share scored up alongside retail venue count. The pairing is aimed at retail siting: where an international customer base and existing shopping activity coincide.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Foreign nationals share
higher
65%
Published share of residents without German citizenship.
retail
higher
35%
Rollup count of mapped retail venues.
What this can’t tell you
Citizenship is not birthplace, language or ancestry — a German citizen born abroad is not counted here and a resident born in Germany without German citizenship is. Retail count is presence, not turnover, and the two are counted in different universes.
Try changing it
· Drop the retail term to rank on the citizenship share alone.
· Swap the share for a single nationality group for a sharper picture.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on Foreign nationals share (higher ranks higher, weight 0.65) and retail (higher ranks higher, weight 0.35), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #1 with a score of 74.8/100 across 44 blocks: 36% foreign nationals share and ≈735 retail & shopping venues nearby. It spans Maxvorstadt. Freimann (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #2 with a score of 68.1/100 across 43 blocks: 39% foreign nationals share and ≈106 retail & shopping venues nearby. It spans Schwabing. Laim ranks #3 with a score of 65.6/100 across 42 blocks: 32% foreign nationals share and ≈164 retail & shopping venues nearby. It spans 8.2. Fasangarten (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #4 with a score of 62.2/100 across 43 blocks: 33% foreign nationals share and ≈88 retail & shopping venues nearby. It spans Ramersdorf. Berg am Laim ranks #5 with a score of 63.6/100 across 42 blocks: 34% foreign nationals share and ≈156 retail & shopping venues nearby. It spans Ramersdorf.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Foreign nationals share (2022) and retail. 2,366 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Where do residents with other European (non-EU) citizenship live in Munich (München)?
other European (non-EU) citizenship counts from the Zensus 2022 nationality-group partition
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Fasangarten (Obergiesing-Fasangarten), Neuperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach) and Am Waldfriedhof (Sendling-Westpark). Fasangarten (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) leads with a score of 82.8/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈5,242 residents (other European countries). Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Fasangartenin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans GiesingScore 83
≈5,242 residents (other European countries)
Neuperlachin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtScore 78
≈5,650 residents (other European countries)
Am Waldfriedhofin the Sendling-Westpark districtalso spans SendlingScore 78
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans MaxvorstadtScore 77
≈4,244 residents (other European countries)
How this query was built
A single class of the published nationality-group partition, counted directly. Germany records citizenship, so these are citizenship counts — not origin, ancestry or ethnicity, none of which Zensus 2022 collects.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
Other European countries
higher
100%
Residents holding the citizenship of a non-EU European country — a published nationality-group class.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about where residents were born, what languages they speak, or how long they have lived in Germany. A resident who has naturalised is counted as German.
Try changing it
· Switch to the nationality diversity index to measure mix rather than a single group.
· Compare two citizenship groups to see how differently they distribute.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
The same query, retargeted
Where do residents with EU27 citizenship live in Munich (München)?
Top areas: Fasangarten, Maxvorstadt and Mittersendling — ≈9,343 residents (EU-27 countries).
Same fields and weights, only the category swapped — adjust any of them on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) based on the presence of residents from Other European countries (higher ranks higher, with a weight of 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Fasangarten (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #1 with a score of 82.8/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈5,242 residents (other European countries). Neuperlach (Ramersdorf-Perlach) ranks #2 with a score of 77.8/100 across 44 blocks, showing ≈5,650 residents (other European countries). Am Waldfriedhof (Sendling-Westpark) ranks #3 with a score of 77.5/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈5,102 residents (other European countries). Laim ranks #4 with a score of 77.3/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈4,130 residents (other European countries). Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) ranks #5 with a score of 76.5/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈4,244 residents (other European countries).
Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks, grouped together within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: Other European countries (2022). 2,219 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Which parts of Munich (München) have the most transit stops and the fewest car parks?
Transit-stop density scored against mapped parking — a car-light access index (Overture Maps)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg), Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) and Schwabing (Schwabing-West). Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) leads with a score of 54.1/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈20 transit stops and ≈6 parking facilities. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans 8.2Score 54
≈20 transit stops
≈6 parking facilities
Ludwigsvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans ObergiesingScore 52
≈13 transit stops
≈1 parking facilities
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans Schwabing-WestScore 48
Thalkirchenin the Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln districtalso spans Am WaldfriedhofScore 49
≈12 transit stops
≈1 parking facilities
How this query was built
Transit stops scored up and parking scored down. Both describe the same street network, so they combine without crossing universes, and together they separate genuinely transit-oriented areas from ones that simply have a lot of everything.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
transit stop count
higher
60%
Count of mapped public transport stops in the area.
parking count
lower
40%
Count of mapped car parking facilities, scored inverted so car-light areas rank higher.
What this can’t tell you
A stop is a stop whether one bus an hour or a metro line serves it, and mapped parking is not all parking — on-street spaces are largely absent from the data. This does not measure car ownership, which Germany does not publish at this resolution.
Try changing it
· Drop the parking term to rank on transit density alone.
· Add pedestrian street length for a walk-and-ride view.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6) and parking count (lower ranks higher, weight 0.4), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Nymphenburg (Neuhausen-Nymphenburg) ranks #1 with a score of 54.1/100 across 43 blocks: ≈20 transit stops and ≈6 parking facilities. It spans 8.2. Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #2 with a score of 52.3/100 across 43 blocks: ≈13 transit stops and ≈1 parking facilities. It spans Obergiesing. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #3 with a score of 48.1/100 across 45 blocks: ≈11 transit stops and ≈1 parking facilities. It spans Schwabing-West. Au-Haidhausen ranks #4 with a score of 49.4/100 across 43 blocks: ≈21 transit stops and ≈4 parking facilities. It spans Bogenhausen. Thalkirchen (Thalkirchen-Obersendling-Forstenried-Fürstenried-Solln) ranks #5 with a score of 48.5/100 across 43 blocks: ≈12 transit stops and ≈1 parking facilities. It spans Am Waldfriedhof.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: transit stop count and parking count. 2,889 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Which of Munich (München)'s nightlife areas are easiest to reach by transit?
Bar and nightlife venue counts blended with transit stop density — a late-access index
In Munich (München), the areas with the highest scores are Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt), Au-Haidhausen, and Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann). Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) leads with a score of 61.2/100 across 44 blocks, showing ≈142 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈46 transit stops. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Ludwigsvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans IsarvorstadtScore 61
Venue count alone finds where the bars are; adding transit finds where people can actually get to them and home again. The two are counted in different universes — venues and network — so the result ranks places rather than stating a fact about either.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
bar and nightlife
higher
65%
Rollup count of every mapped bar and nightlife venue in the area.
transit stop count
higher
35%
Count of mapped transit stops — how reachable the area is late at night.
What this can’t tell you
Venue count is not capacity, footfall or opening hours: one entry is one mapped place whether it seats twenty or two thousand. Transit presence says nothing about whether services run late.
Try changing it
· Drop transit to rank on venue count alone.
· Add residents aged 20–29 to see where venues and that age band overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
To identify these areas, every block in Munich (München) was ranked based on the number of bars and nightlife venues (weighted 0.65) and transit stops (weighted 0.35). The top-scoring blocks were then grouped into the areas listed below.
Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #1 with a score of 61.2/100 across 44 blocks, featuring ≈142 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈46 transit stops. Au-Haidhausen ranks #2 with a score of 35.2/100 across 44 blocks, with ≈45 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈20 transit stops. Schwabing (Schwabing-Freimann) ranks #3 with a score of 35.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈42 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈11 transit stops. Following these, 8.2 ranks #4 with a score of 37.6/100 across 40 blocks, with ≈29 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈16 transit stops. Sendling ranks #5 with a score of 27.3/100 across 41 blocks, with ≈18 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈11 transit stops.
Fields scored: bar and nightlife and transit stop count. 2,719 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Which busy parts of Munich (München) have the fewest transit stops?
Resident counts ranked against mapped transit stops — a coverage gap index
In Munich, the top areas include Schwabing, Isarvorstadt, and Nymphenburg. Schwabing leads with a score of 88.7/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈7 transit stops and ≈77,314 residents. Isarvorstadt follows with 86.3/100, and Nymphenburg with 85.1/100. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans MaxvorstadtScore 89
≈7 transit stops
≈77,314 residents
Isarvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans AuScore 86
≈7 transit stops
≈65,858 residents
Nymphenburgin the Neuhausen-Nymphenburg districtalso spans Neuhausen-NymphenburgScore 85
Perlachin the Ramersdorf-Perlach districtalso spans NeuperlachScore 84
≈0 transit stops
≈30,680 residents
How this query was built
Residents ranked high against mapped transit stops ranked low. Framed as a coverage gap because it compares ranks, not because any area has no service.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
transit stop count
lower
50%
Count of mapped transit stops, scored inverted so thinner coverage ranks higher.
Residents
higher
50%
Published resident count — the demand side of the blend.
What this can’t tell you
Nothing about service frequency, route quality or walking distance to the nearest stop, and it never asserts an absence of transit.
Try changing it
· Add pedestrian street length to separate poorly-connected areas from poorly-walkable ones.
· Swap residents for the 65+ share to look at coverage for older residents.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This analysis ranks every block in Munich based on its transit stop count (lower ranks higher, weight 0.5) and resident count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.5). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Schwabing ranks #1 with a score of 88.7/100 across 43 blocks, featuring ≈7 transit stops and ≈77,314 residents. Isarvorstadt ranks #2 with a score of 86.3/100 across 44 blocks, with ≈7 transit stops and ≈65,858 residents. Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 85.1/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈5 transit stops and ≈58,263 residents. Sendling ranks #4 with a score of 84.1/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈9 transit stops and ≈63,413 residents. Perlach ranks #5 with a score of 83.8/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈0 transit stops and ≈30,680 residents.
Fields scored: transit stop count and Residents (2022). 2,896 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Which parts of Munich (München) have the densest walkable streets and transit?
Pedestrian street length blended with transit stop count — a walkability index (Overture Maps)
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt), Schwabing (Schwabing-West) and Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) leads with a score of 55.6/100 across 46 blocks, where the data shows ≈0.19 km of walkable streets and ≈26 transit stops. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Ludwigsvorstadtin the Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt districtalso spans LehelScore 56
≈0.19 km of walkable streets
≈26 transit stops
Schwabingin the Schwabing-West districtalso spans Am HartScore 54
Obergiesingin the Obergiesing-Fasangarten districtalso spans GiesingScore 53
≈0.16 km of walkable streets
≈16 transit stops
Haidhausenin the Au-Haidhausen districtalso spans AuScore 53
≈0.16 km of walkable streets
≈23 transit stops
How this query was built
Both fields describe the street and transit network, so they sit in the same universe and combine cleanly. Pedestrian length is metres of walkable way; transit stop count is mapped stops.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
pedestrian length m
higher
60%
Metres of pedestrian-accessible way mapped in the area.
transit stop count
higher
40%
Count of mapped public transport stops.
What this can’t tell you
Network density is not pedestrian experience. It says nothing about pavement width, traffic, lighting, gradient, or how often the transit stops are actually served.
Try changing it
· Weight transit stops alone to find interchange-heavy areas.
· Add resident counts to see where walkable network and population overlap.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on pedestrian length m (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6) and transit stop count (higher ranks higher, weight 0.4), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Ludwigsvorstadt (Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt) ranks #1 with a score of 55.6/100 across 46 blocks: ≈0.19 km of walkable streets and ≈26 transit stops. It spans Lehel. Schwabing (Schwabing-West) ranks #2 with a score of 53.7/100 across 45 blocks: ≈0.18 km of walkable streets and ≈10 transit stops. It spans Am Hart. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 55.7/100 across 43 blocks: ≈0.14 km of walkable streets and ≈30 transit stops. It spans 8.2. Obergiesing (Obergiesing-Fasangarten) ranks #4 with a score of 52.8/100 across 44 blocks: ≈0.16 km of walkable streets and ≈16 transit stops. It spans Giesing. Haidhausen (Au-Haidhausen) ranks #5 with a score of 52.9/100 across 43 blocks: ≈0.16 km of walkable streets and ≈23 transit stops. It spans Au.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: pedestrian length m and transit stop count. 2,889 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Where is building volume highest in Munich (München)?
Every mapped building type summed — Overture Maps
In Munich, the highest-ranking areas are Old Town, Maxvorstadt (east), and Maxvorstadt (east 2). Old Town leads with a score of 96.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈15.2 million m³ of building volume. Each area represents a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Old Townin the Altstadt-Lehel districtalso spans MaxvorstadtScore 97
≈15.2 million m³ of building volume
Maxvorstadt (east)in the Maxvorstadt districtalso spans Maxvorstadt, Neuhausen-NymphenburgScore 89
≈10.2 million m³ of building volume
Maxvorstadt (east 2)in the Maxvorstadt districtalso spans Maxvorstadt, SchwabingScore 87
≈10.4 million m³ of building volume
Au (east)in the Au-Haidhausen districtalso spans Au, Berg am LaimScore 87
≈9.7 million m³ of building volume
Au (south-east)in the Au-Haidhausen districtalso spans Au, FasangartenScore 83
≈8.8 million m³ of building volume
How this query was built
All fourteen mapped building types summed into one figure, so the answer is total built mass rather than any single use. The members are added before ranking, which is why this reads as a measurement and not as an index of separate signals.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
building volume
higher
100%
Every mapped building subtype, summed — the area's total built volume in m3.
What this can’t tell you
Volume is not population, floor area or occupancy: a warehouse and an apartment block of the same size count the same. It also says nothing about height — a wide low building can out-measure a narrow tall one — and heights are partly modelled where Overture lacks a measurement.
Try changing it
· Drop everything but residential to see where people are housed rather than where mass is.
· Swap in commercial and retail only for a view of the working city.
· Add resident counts to compare built mass against how many people it holds.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich based on building volume, with higher volume ranking higher (weight 0.9). The top-scoring blocks are then grouped into the areas listed below.
Old Town ranks #1 with a score of 96.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈15.2 million m³ of building volume. Maxvorstadt (east) ranks #2 with a score of 88.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈10.2 million m³ of building volume. Maxvorstadt (east 2) ranks #3 with a score of 86.7/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈10.4 million m³ of building volume. Au (east) ranks #4 with a score of 86.6/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈9.7 million m³ of building volume. Au (south-east) ranks #5 with a score of 82.9/100 across 43 blocks, showing ≈8.8 million m³ of building volume.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: building volume. 2,718 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Which parts of Munich (München) have many residents aged 20-29 but few nightlife venues?
The 20-29 age band ranked against mapped nightlife venues — a gap index
In Munich (München), the highest-ranking areas are Giesing (Untergiesing-Harlaching), Laim and Neuhausen-Nymphenburg. Giesing (Untergiesing-Harlaching) leads with a score of 87/100 across 43 blocks, where the data shows ≈6 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈10,447 residents aged 20–29. Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks within a 1,200 m radius.
Giesingin the Untergiesing-Harlaching districtalso spans FasangartenScore 87
The 20–29 age band scored up against nightlife venue count scored down. It looks for the mismatch rather than the concentration: areas where the likeliest customers already live but few venues are mapped.
Field
Ranks higher when
Weight
Why it’s here
20 to 29
higher
60%
The published 20–29 band, used under its own label rather than as a generation.
bar and nightlife competition
lower
40%
Rollup count of mapped bar and nightlife venues, scored inverted so thin presence ranks higher.
What this can’t tell you
It cannot tell you those residents want another bar, or that the ones already there are underused. Age is counted on people and venues on places, with no table crossing them, and a thin venue count is thin mapping — not proof of an opening.
Try changing it
· Raise the venue weight to lean harder on where nightlife is absent.
· Flip the venue direction to find established nightlife districts instead.
· Swap the age band for residents in their 30s.
All of these are adjustable on the Munich (München) map on the Free Tier.
Full breakdown & sources
This query ranks every block in Munich (München) on 20 to 29 (higher ranks higher, weight 0.6) and bar and nightlife competition (lower ranks higher, weight 0.4), then groups the top-scoring blocks into the areas below.
Giesing (Untergiesing-Harlaching) ranks #1 with a score of 87/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈6 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈10,447 residents aged 20–29. Laim ranks #2 with a score of 82.8/100 across 44 blocks, with ≈5 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈7,598 residents aged 20–29. Neuhausen-Nymphenburg ranks #3 with a score of 82.5/100 across 44 blocks, with ≈12 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈10,183 residents aged 20–29. Mittersendling (Sendling-Westpark) ranks #4 with a score of 83.5/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈8 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈9,776 residents aged 20–29. Maxvorstadt ranks #5 with a score of 82.3/100 across 43 blocks, with ≈18 bars & nightlife venues nearby and ≈14,714 residents aged 20–29.
Each area is a cluster of high-scoring blocks grouped within a 1,200 m radius.
Fields scored: 20 to 29 (2022) and bar and nightlife competition. 2,304 of 2,999 blocks in Munich (München) were eligible and ranked. Last computed 2026-08-12.
Sources
Zensus 2022 — Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), counted as of 15 May 2022
Every query ranks Munich (München) block by block on the fields it names, combines those ranks into a 0–100 score using the weights shown, then groups the highest-scoring blocks into areas. Sources: Zensus 2022. Because the score is a blend of ranks rather than a ratio, it tells you how areas compare with each other — not how many of anything there are per resident.
Each block is scored as a weighted percentile rank over available signals, renormalised by data coverage, rescaled to 0-100; blocks are H3 resolution 9 hexagons. Areas were formed with the score cluster engine at a 1.2 km radius, keeping the 5 strongest. Change the radius on the map to widen or tighten them.
Areas are only ranked where the thing being measured could actually exist, so a gap search cannot present empty parkland as an opportunity. Shops, homes and offices need a building; transit stops, EV chargers and bike docks only need a street or path. Anywhere the measure is already present counts as a candidate by definition.
Dating the numbers
Zensus 2022 is a single-day count published on a 100 m grid; it is not updated between census rounds.
Places, buildings and transportation come from a dated Overture release. A place record means the venue is mapped, not that it is licensed, open, or of any particular size.
Zensus 2022 is a single vintage, so nothing here describes growth, decline or any change over time.
“Senior share 65+” is computed by this pipeline from published components; the publisher does not release it directly.
Counted as residents aged 30–39 on 15 May 2022, the Zensus 2022 reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
Counted as residents aged 20–29 on 15 May 2022, the Zensus 2022 reference date. Those residents are older now; census age bands are never rolled forward, because people move in, move away and die, and the published band cannot be re-aged without a full cohort model.
“Nationality diversity index” is computed by this pipeline from published components; the publisher does not release it directly.
How far each answer can be pushed
Each question is labelled with a tier. The tier caps what the answer may claim, whatever the numbers say.
T4 — This is a ranking of places, not a measurement of people. The signals it combines are counted in different universes — the data contains no table crossing them — so a high rank means both signals rank high in the same area, not that they describe the same residents.
Builds MapBees's location-intelligence pipeline end to end — census and Overture Maps ingestion, H3 hex scoring, and the map interface — and writes the methodology behind every number on the site.
